reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I know I am late to the party but.....
Wonderful post OP.
Filled with interesting information and links.
I have to point out that your intro into the threads creates the premise that certain events have occured in order to support of fullfil the
transhumanists eltist agenda.
Unfortunately it is mere conjecture that is then lost in the information overload you then present in the bulk of your thread.
The information you present is great, but the inferences you make are simply unsupported.
Firstly, the Global Warming Debate and the "agenda" to present a global tax has failed to occur, the last two major global events organised to get a
global accord and agreement to implement a system of cap and trade or tax have failed. It is the actually banks that want a cap and trade solution as
that would enable them make money on the system, where as other solutions, ones that involve taxes and then dividends or rebates to individual
citizens who are energy efficient cuts the banking and global markets out of the system. Countries have opted for individual responses but global
agreement is not one of them. Australia for instance will introduce a carbon tax on pollution that then rebates individuals cutting out the "middle
men" so to speak. Can you see how this argues against your intro?
Secondly, whilst there is debate over the issue of global warming, it is a manufactured debate organised by interest groups intent on maintaining the
status quo. But I won't get into that as it would be as long an OP as yours. If you are interested in the above PM me and I will point you to some
great research that supports the above.
Finanlly, onto the terrorism and GFC.
I agree that the war on terrorism has been used to implement many changes in our societies. But the premise you present is "egocentric" in nature. By
that I mean your thread seems to think the USA is the World! It is not.
The US is addicted to oil, it has to defend an insure that this is protected and maintained. It is a no brainer that the US has to maintain military
supremacy in order to protect its own interests. Its budget is a reflection of that, multiple wars, not to mention maintaining and/or establishing new
The GFC too, does not support your premise. If the collapse is as you say:"all the hard numbers point to a total collapse, especially in the USA. The
Federal Reserve and Eurobank are both privately owned institutions, and there's no debating this fact", then they must already have the abilities or
technology you speak of!
If total collapse is the agenda, then they must have a plan for the aftermath, which means they have the technology and the systems to support the
This also argues with the global warming premise you present, there is no need for a new global tax if the system is about to collapse, indeed there
is no need for the issue at all.
On its own, the technology and the advances you detail and share are incredible.
Seeing as this is ATS, I am not going to critisize you for attempting to tie in the agenda that you have. But I do not think it is supported with any
It is unfortunate because I think the technology is exciting and it is a shame that you seem to fear it!
S and F.
edit on 15/4/12 by atlasastro because: (no reason given)