Obama Administration Approves First Direct Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Through New High-Risk Insura, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 14-7-2010 @ 07:22 PM by dolphinfan

Obama Administration Approves First Direct Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Through New High-Risk Insurance Pools


www.cnsnews.com
If you want proof that President Obama's Executive Order on taxpayer-funded abortion was a sham, look no further than Pennsylvania, says House Republican Leader John Boehner (Ohio).

Health and Human Services Department is giving Pennsylvania $160 million to set up a new high-risk insurance pool that will cover any abortion that is legal in the state

President Obama pledged that under his health care plan “no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 14-7-2010 @ 07:59 PM by dolphinfan
reply to post by David9176



Insurance policys are a voluntary deal. There are policys that do not cover abortion and should someone feel strongly about it, can use that provider. Different states also have different policys.

I get what you are saying and that insurance is a collective pool and essentially everyone is subsidizing everyone else, but there are choices.

You have a fundamentally different business when mandated federal taxes are used for this purpose


reply posted on 14-7-2010 @ 08:08 PM by David9176
reply to post by dolphinfan





You have a fundamentally different business when mandated federal taxes are used for this purpose


Yes, but do most people have a choice in not having health insurance...really? It's tied to our employers after all. Getting it on your own costs a fortune.

I'll guarantee almost no one thinks about whether their insurance company does or not...and they most likely do have insurance that covers them.

I'll admit, I was upset about federally funded abortions when I first heard about them a year ago or so (whenever it was), without knowing health insurance companies already did it.

In the end it doesn't really matter. EIther way your money goes into a pool that funds abortions.

What is your stance on abortion if I dare ask?

[edit on 14-7-2010 by David9176]


reply posted on 14-7-2010 @ 08:20 PM by ZuluChaka
reply to post by David9176



It does matter. There is a huge difference between being mandated to buy insurance that supports abortion and being able to choose whether or not you want to buy insurance that supports abortion.


reply posted on 14-7-2010 @ 08:24 PM by David9176
reply to post by ZuluChaka





It does matter. There is a huge difference between being mandated to buy insurance that supports abortion and being able to choose whether or not you want to buy insurance that supports abortion.


Yeah, about 5 percent difference....in which most people probably weren't aware of anyway.

LIke i stated in my earlier post....most health insurance is tied up with your employer. The only choice you will have is if your spouse also has another job with different health insurance.

How many people do you know that have health insurance that isn't tied up with their employer?

-----

Again, my point is that we shouldn't fund abortions PERIOD....except for extreme cases.

So are you saying abortions are ok as long as it's done through business channels and not government channels?



[edit on 14-7-2010 by David9176]


reply posted on 14-7-2010 @ 09:28 PM by dolphinfan
reply to post by David9176



I am for reasonably tough restrictions on abortion. I also believe there is no constitutional right to an abortion (funny how the feds consider the only right to privacy we have is when it refers to abortion, isn't it?).

I also think that states should have great freedom in dictating abortion laws, right up to making it illegal.


reply posted on 14-7-2010 @ 10:06 PM by ZuluChaka
reply to post by David9176



The point you miss is that you can choose to opt out of your employers plan, because you are not required by law to buy in.


reply posted on 14-7-2010 @ 10:17 PM by burdman30ott6
reply to post by David9176



Yeah, they do... However, in order to make any comparison you are trying to make, you would have to demonstrate that a higher percentage of insurance customer do not get out of their insurance what they pay in premiums. The majority of tax payers aren't covered under public funded medical services because they have insurance or private means of paying for services. I would find it difficult to imagine that the majority of insurance holders don't eventually draw more out of their insurance than they pay into it (which is why the insurance system was failing in the first place.) Using representative numbers here, let's say I pay $200 a month for insurance coverage for myself, my wife, and my 2 children. That's $2400 a year. I pay (again, representative numbers here, I have no intention of airing my financial means on ATS) roughly 6 times as much in taxes as I pay in insurance premiums. That's all money I will likely never see a return on... I guaran-damn-tee that I see a solid return on the $2400 I spend in insurance premiums, however.

The dollars I pay that insurance company can't be used to kill the unborn, because my family and I use every cent of it by year's end. Sadly, the same cannot be said for those taxes as every time I turn around, Uncle Sam is back with his hand out going "gimme, gimme" like some demonic crackhead who's stolen from enough friends and family members to get kicked out of their lives for good. Never once have I actually seen Uncle Sam draw out his wallet and offer me any jack.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 18 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 3 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags