It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

orange spheres of light photographed near crop circle

page: 3
2
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 07:35 PM
link   

The two did not get to the Guy's Cliffe wheat formation until 3:30 AM on July 12, about two days after it was first reported. “I love the beauty of the dawn,” Andrew told me, “and like to photograph formations at sunrise whenever I can. But unfortunately on the early morning of July 12, the sky was overcast and it started raining while we were trying to photograph. But it was well worth the trip because I saw three, bright, orange-yellow balls of light moving in the air.”


It doesn't say they took the pictures at 3;30 it says they arrived at 3;30..judging by the light i'd guess the pcis were taken around 4 to 4-30 am
people should actually read what it say's not assume.

 
Mod Edit: No Quote/Plagiarism – Please Review This Link.

Mod Edit: New External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 18/8/2010 by ArMaP]




posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 07:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by FireMoon
And you live in Warwickshire do you? I've seen those orange lights on a number of occasions.


I live in Chicago, and I see those exact orange spheres up to twice a day. They even seem to follow me... I see them in the east when I head to work in the morning and in the west when I ride home.

Freaky stuff, huh?



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 07:57 PM
link   
reply to post by FireMoon
 


Like I said in my first post, only the first two look like the sun is shining through the trees, the others... I dunno.

Now moving away from the lights, don't you find it odd that the first two photos have an orange sky and the rest don't.

Can the sky really change colour that quick?

This is what I was trying to point out to you before your rant about pseudo skeptics.

More like pseudo believers, ignoring the biggest hole in the story.



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 08:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 


No what it is... if you are facing say, south east at sunrise... the sky to your left is yellow, move to face south west, to your right and it is slate grey... It does another weird trick as well. The underside of many deciduous tree's leafs look silver in that light when a slight breeze catches them. It tends only to be the flat stratus clouds that give this effect. The guy saying it started to rain would be commensurate with that.

The orange lights, really do look like classic tribouminescence to me.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 03:09 AM
link   
reply to post by DCDAVECLARKE
 

it was in the news, the filmaker of the footage himself, told he wanted to put up the hoax, to see the reactions of the public.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 03:45 AM
link   
I saw two orange glowing balls moving slowly over Klemzig around 2002. They would slowly illuminate, then dim. They were around 1km apart, and around 50m from the ground.

As one would dim, the other would illuminate. They were in synch with each other.

5 minutes after they left, a UH60 from Edinburgh air base came over (with no lights on at all). It suddenly turned on its navigation lights, as well as a ground searchlight and headed off in the direction they left.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 09:48 AM
link   
reply to post by DCDAVECLARKE
 


olivers crop circle



www.youtube.com...

Its a HOAX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 12:21 PM
link   
The hoax you are describing is very old. It is interesting that it is in the exact same area though. I didnt make this connection before. Are you claiming the new photos are hoaxed?



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 02:19 PM
link   
Regarding the idea that the ufo photos posted in the OP is the sun: It seems the best way to determine if this is possible is to simply determine what time and direction the sun was actually rising at at the times claimed. The sun will rise in a set position, at least from the point of view of the casual observer - I think we can agree that it will not bounce around or be in a wide area - especially in a 30 second window as Pyrka claims. It will move but really not in any noticeable or radical degree. Two of the photos of the "orbs" appear to be in roughly the same location, while the third seems to be in a different area (the one with the orangish sky is the odd man out - which is a bit troubling).

Using a wheather report from a nearby area:

Use this link to refer to locations nearby Warwickhire, U.K.

We can see that time of sunrise for Coventry (which is not too far off) on July 12, 2010 is 4:58 A.M - roughly 5:00 AM in the area.

Sunrise/Sunset for Coventry


This is nearly an hour and a half after Andrew Pyrka and his friend say they got onto the field. Of course it doesnt seem like the article lists a time for the photos so we don' know how long they were out there, but it is suggestive. If they were taking pictures of sunrise then it means they waited an hour and a half. If we had the exif data from his camera then we could check this.

We know that Pyrka was standing in the crop circle formation from his interview. - so we have a location for where the photos were taken from.
It turns out that sunrise was in the direction of NE. I am assuming that that means if you look to the NE then that is where the sun will be as it rises- (If I have got this wrong I am sure someone will tell me!) I am no meterological expert (or astronomical for that matter!).

direction of sunrise for 15 July in a nearby area

(I am sure that the direction of the sunrise is not going to change radically in the space of a few days or for a nearby area).

Using google earth I superimpose direction of sunrise and the reputed path of the orbs in relation to north and the position of the circle.



It appears that sunrise is in the almost exact opposite direction from where the pictures were taken (facing the river from inside the crop circle formation). If this is true and I have not got the direction of the sun totally screwed up (which is altogether possible) then the conclusion must be that it could not have been the sun.

Of course there s not a lot of identifying features in the photos themselves but 2 do show a sharp bend in the path and all are against a forest background. Judging from google earth there is no other dense or continuous forest line available except that which goes along the river. I think the most probable position for the sharp bend in the path is to the east of where the formation was found, where it appears 3 paths converge.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 03:27 PM
link   
reply to post by liquidself
 


That means if you are correct there is actually a road in the direction of the orbs so it could be car tail lights!



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:32 PM
link   
The witness claimed there were no roads nearby - but I have been thinking about that one after having a good look at the google earth pics. It s hard to know the lay of the land when you re not there. There is a highway to the left, but it is in the wrong direction. There seems to be a wide path south of the river, but I cant tell if it would be navigable or not.
There s clearly a road near what looks like a home south of the castle (if it can be called a castle) that curves to the south but its positiong is dicey. If it was car lights it would have to be on that path running along the river.
But then it doesnt go far enough to the trisection for the first 2 photos.



posted on Jul, 16 2010 @ 01:26 AM
link   
reply to post by wmd_2008
 


The full story, as ever in this field (excuse the pun), is not quite as straightforward as HOAX.

The full story is out there on various sites, I don't have time to search at the moment, and the footage in the public domain has been acknowledged by the special effects guy who filmed and altered it, to be a hoax.

The discrepancy is that isn't supposed to be the footage that was first shown to the "researchers" in the pub who watched it straight off the display of the camcorder it was filmed on.



posted on Jul, 16 2010 @ 05:27 AM
link   
reply to post by liquidself
 


Nice work, I was meaning to get around to working out where the sun would be relative to their position.

I wonder if maybe these photos were taken at sunset then?

As you say, EXIF data would help solve these issues quite easily.



[edit on 16/7/10 by Chadwickus]



posted on Jul, 16 2010 @ 08:32 AM
link   
reply to post by liquidself
 


Good work there. That does make the veracity of the pics a little more credible. As i said earlier, the sky to the South east would have a yellowish tinge as they tracked the lights to the west the sky would grow much greyer in colour.



posted on Aug, 18 2010 @ 06:18 PM
link   
Ok from what i see and i guess u guys missed it on the other post that was in the wrong section look @ the pics with the crop circle in the middle with 4 small pics on top and 3 on the bottom... does anyone else see the orange ball to the top left of the crop circle, what is that????



posted on Aug, 19 2010 @ 11:36 AM
link   
See photos in this post

The area was still hot.
Still with all these crop circles venture a sky photo to catch
a still hovering saucer or two.
Catch them admiring their beam work.
Its just training for the crew.
The fastest ship on earth and can't be seen by humans only in photos.
So how do there anti Tesla agents know where the next circle
will be done.
Imagine if the aliens burned a crop circle in the side of the WTC
by mistake before turning on the force beams.

See crop circle gone wild here
Oops.



posted on Aug, 19 2010 @ 12:05 PM
link   
it's strange how there were so many orange lights in July of this year.

everywhere!



posted on Aug, 19 2010 @ 04:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by liquidself
 


That means if you are correct there is actually a road in the direction of the orbs so it could be car tail lights!


Mate, how come it is that anytime "orange lights" are mentioned in a thread title, you rush into it with knee-jerk negativity? You do not even look at these stories with open inquiry and curiosity, you just jump in, pick out any minor, "questionable" detail you can, blow it out of proportion with an extremely negative spin, and then label it a hoax. This is all you do. It would not surprise me if you were some type of paid shill, because, as someone who has personally seen these orange masses of light with my own eyes, I can be a testamant to the fact that they are indeed very real.

These lights are being seen by so many people in England that there's a website specifically devoted to eyewitness reports. You can go to it here: www.uk-ufo.co.uk...

Member ufoorbhunter recorded about 28 minutes of these objects in Derby a few years ago. He could tell you all about his experiences. Here is part of his sighting: www.dailymotion.com...



[edit on 19-8-2010 by hermantinkly]



posted on Aug, 19 2010 @ 04:05 PM
link   
Oh, and my opinion about these ships of light is that they are extraterrestrials from the Pleiades. They are the collection of energy known as the Pleiadians.



posted on Aug, 20 2010 @ 04:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by hermantinkly
Oh, and my opinion about these ships of light is that they are extraterrestrials from the Pleiades. They are the collection of energy known as the Pleiadians.


i agree. but you're saying the UFOs ARE the ET's themselves, not just their craft?



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join