It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.
[Snip because that's very long]
I knew you were going to claim that.. you're a real funny guy. I only posted those because you insisted on verses from your holy book. I never claimed my beliefs were from your holy book.
And you cannot say this is taken out of context:
"
From Islamic Law:
Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 - 8.2) - "Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory... it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My beliefs are largely because of what I see goes on in the news concerning Muslim communities. Like the guy who killed his daughter because she was becoming too Americanized.. and the claim that under Islamic law this is acceptable. The actions of that Islamic community spoke volumes. No one turned this guy in to the cops or said a negative thing about him.. many who were interviewed agreed that this mans faith says these things are o.k.
I agree not all Muslims are in on the take over the world thing.. but there is a large Islamic faction I call Radical Islam that does believe this was Mohamed's mandate and they actively do pursue it.
More about that here.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
My point is if deception is legal and there is this radical faction then they can claim they lawfully use deception to achieve their murderous goals. With this deception in place.. who am I to trust.. You ? who claim you are a loving caring spiritual guy? I cannot because who knows.. you may be deceiving me....
[edit on 14-7-2010 by JohnPhoenix]
[edit on 14-7-2010 by JohnPhoenix]
16:106 (Asad) As for anyone who denies God after having once attained to faith-and this, to be sure, does not apply to [133] one who does it under duress, the while his heart remains true to his faith, [134] but [only, to] him who willingly opens up his heart to a denial of the truth-: upon all such [falls] God's condemnation, and tremendous suffering awaits them: -
Originally posted by jerico65
I agree it's a perfect plan.
You can see how well the Middle East has become since Mo-Mo put them on Full Retard.
Originally posted by oozyism
Originally posted by jerico65
I agree it's a perfect plan.
You can see how well the Middle East has become since Mo-Mo put them on Full Retard.
You mean how well the middle east became due to Western miss management of the area.
Politics mate..
So China treating Chinese citizens different than non-Chinese citizen is Apartheid rule lol, nice try.
Those who are non-Muslims should live amongst their own
Nope, you make agreements with the host country's laws, you must abide by your agreements.
If you reject Islam, you will be given Islamic citizenship, that is rejecting the American constitution, and going against it.
Under Islamic rule, if you are a non-Muslim, doesn't make you second class citizen, you are not a citizen at all lol.
You choose to become a Muslim, if you decide you don't want to be Muslim, that is your decision. Individual decision, best Democracy around, not majority.
Why should minority live under the rule of majority? When everyone can choose?
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by Blaine91555
yes I accept that Islam treats women different than men, but I also know that women and men are different, but equal.
[edit on 14-7-2010 by oozyism]
Originally posted by mordant1
The rab tribes were at each others throats til the westerners gave the an oil franchise and more cash than they knew what to do with. Nothing of value to mankind from them for 700 years, so no wonder thay hate the jews so much, hebrews in medicine and science have saved more rabs than any rab including mudhummud
These were your exact words and it is blatant aparthied.
These lines contradict , in the first if I reject islam I'm in if I reject my country's laws which contradics your statements of agreeing with your host country's laws. In the second I'm completely out and the words bolded are very revealing.
Wrong again , my you are conceited , the majority would be the Umma , the muslim community. And they would say-
"Convert , pay jizyah or die" this is a very democratic choice , isn't it?
There will always be a minority who do not agree with the majority , everyone can choose , but they will not make the same choices. How is your vitriol any better than what is practiced in the west.You deny me citizenship because I did not convert to your religion , isn't that worst , at least in the west , no religion is prerequisit to my citizenship and I am not persecuted for it. While under your system I'm disenfranchised or deported.
I ask again , do you prescribe to shariah law.
What started me here is your belief it is OK for a Theocracy to throw a citizen out if they do not believe in their particular Religion or Theology.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
16:106 (Asad) As for anyone who denies God after having once attained to faith-and this, to be sure, does not apply to [133] one who does it under duress, the while his heart remains true to his faith, [134] but [only, to] him who willingly opens up his heart to a denial of the truth-: upon all such [falls] God's condemnation, and tremendous suffering awaits them: -
????
And don't bring me Hadith etc I'm not concerned with those, I'm concerned with Quran, the source of Islam.
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to post by sdcigarpig
The problem that I see with any religious system being claimed as a good idea of a government system is that it is not a democracy, rather it is an olgarchy, a system of government that is run by the religious part of society, and not that by the people
Many assumptions are made in this thread, and this is an example of it:
I clearly stated that the Quran is the constitution, Islam is the nation, Muslim is the citizen.
You choose to become a Muslim, it is your option.
And no, the government isn't ruled by the religious part of the society, that is cultural.
The government is supposed to be ruled by any one Islam sees capable of ruling.
Not religious, it can be from any back ground, from any professions, the only condition is, for you to be a citizen of Islam.