It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A WOMAN has walked free from court after deliberately infecting her baby with HIV because she thought it was HARMLESS.
The mum believed the dangers of the virus were a myth made up by pharmaceutical firms.
Read more: www.thesun.co.uk...
Originally posted by RogerT
Typical Sun drama headline and misinforming garbage.
This woman did not deliberately infect her baby with HIV. She refused a C-Section and presumably chose a natural childbirth, as is her right IMO.
I have no idea what 'staunched' means in terms of childbirth, but presumably it's something to do with blood flow and the umbilical cord?
Originally posted by darkelf
I'm on the fence as far as my feelings on modern medicine and big pharma. I am alive today due to both. I am also disabled due to both. I believe quality of life outweighs quantity of life. Where does one draw the line?