It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Post Your Un-debunkable Real UFO Footage

page: 5
5
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 03:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by GeminiSky
reply to post by HandBanana
 


Bad link, cant view video, can you re-post?


Sorry, here you go.




posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 03:35 PM
link   
Doesn't seem to be working for me. Can someone else post this for me.
www.youtube.com...



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 03:55 PM
link   
reply to post by HandBanana
 


Some observations;
One, the "official" footage starts out with what appears to be stock footage of what are Mig -21's taking off. why would any official footage, classified or not have this edited into it?
Second, the cockpit doesn't appear at all to be from a Mig-21. Search Mig-21 cockpit view on Google images, look for airforce walkaround,: there are actually umpteen cockpit images to choos from. None of them look at all like the cockpit in the video to me. If it's official film, why use different types of aircraft. This mistake is seen constantly in film, where differing types are used to represent one aircraft, and it's really distracting to aircraft fans.
I would also ask why the film is so short, why were they filming from the cockpit anyway, and also where is the film from the other aircraft?
The Mig-21 was still equipted with cannon as opposed to only missles, normally any footage would be from gun camera's instead of the cockpit.
Just off the top of my head.
It doesn't look like a Mig-17-19 or 23 either. Doesn't seem to be an f-4, or any Sukhoi aircraft either!
judge for yourself.





[edit on 15-7-2010 by OldDragger]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 


OldDraggler,

Take a look at my analysis of this video, its located in page 5 of this thread www.abovetopsecret.com...

Its definetly an F15 for the cockpit shot and Mig21's for the exterior shots. Also note my comparison of the object in the footage to known target drones. They look nothing alike.

( I have attached a video taken from the backseat of an F15. Note the similarities, it is the same aircraft in the UFO video.)

---GeminiSky

[edit on 15-7-2010 by GeminiSky]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by GeminiSky
Hey everyone!

I started this thread in hopes of finding at least one piece of undeniable, un explainable and un-debunkable UFO footage.

I would love everyone to share the videos they have come across (you-tube embed preferred)


Hi GeminiSky, for as far I know, are these ones not debunked yet although I thought they did try it with the concord video.

This is the footage what triggered my interest in the Ufo phenomenon about 39 years ago.



I can’t find this one on youtube, so I do it this way.

This interesting video is recorded by Mr. Mark A. Olson. Mr. Olson started in 2004 with videotaping a wave of UFO Sightings.
Look how amazingly fast and easy this object moves around the Jet-stream. Just as described by so many first hand witnesses of UFO's for so many decades now.

media.abovetopsecret.com...

This is the famous concorde UFO.

UFO passing by the concord during Transatlantic flight.




posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:08 PM
link   
reply to post by GeminiSky
 


Hey, it'd Dragger Old-Dragger.
You are correct! Great find! Definatly an f-15!



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:09 PM
link   
reply to post by FireMoon
 


Funny thing about that video when he mentions the first black object he claims is trying to push the orb( FOR WANT OF A BETTER WORD) why doesn't he mention the second black object that comes into view behind the first after a couple of seconds.

Also you see the light flicker/flash plane or star in the distance and a couple of birds perhaps.


Then his Moon ufo at 70 miles per second
what does he base that on the approx distance of the field of view of the Moon that would mean the object would be just above the surface at least a couple of miles in dia and it casts no shadow YEAH RIGHT!



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:12 PM
link   
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
 


Are you still replying posts? Are you sure your doctor has given you permission for that?.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:12 PM
link   
reply to post by GeminiSky
 

It's called a sleeve target.
www.airtarget.com...



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


Whats more worrying APPLE made people part with cash for the i-phone and i-pad



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:18 PM
link   
www.youtube.com...

Please Please Please look at this one!!! Its Awsome!!!!!!! it ends abit abruptly tho.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:18 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


With no due respect, that is your opinion and not fact. Correct?

Thanks

[edit on 15-7-2010 by Ohimpissednow]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


Really? A sleeve target? Thats what you feel is being filmed in the mig ufo footage?

A sleeve target is towed behind an airplane by pull ropes. And cannot maneuver on its own; A sleeve target is used for ground to air targetting, not air to air, hence no wings, or fins.

This is why target drones for aircraft have powered flight, wings, fins, and control surfaces.

The object in the MIG UFO video is filmed making a tight right turn with the Jet also turning in to pursue the object.

Impossible to do for the oversized, rope pulled windsock that you call a Sleeve Target





The sleeve target has a slight conical shape.

It is manufactured of a thin, light weight, nylon textile fabric coated with polyurethane. It consists of a circular half spheric end, and six longitudinal gores. The end and every second gore are made of a black fabric with metal foil laminated to the inside.

Remaning gores are non-laminated and glow-orange.

The front part of the sleeve is provided with a wire rope used for attachment of six pull ropes.

Flight stability is achieved by the three air outlet holes at the end of the sleeve.

SHORT radar reflective sleeve for LIGHT TOWING AIRCRAFT AND TARGET DRONES

For speed range 70- 220 knots

Designed for Ground-to-Air gunnery practice




[edit on 15-7-2010 by GeminiSky]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by spacevisitor
 


Great videos!! Thank you very much for sharing!!

--GeminiSky



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by spacevisitor
 


I always thought the first video was neat too, mostly because of the eyewitness talking about the object slowing down and speeding up.

The second video (Concord footage) has been attributed to a reflection off of the stabilization optics in the camera. This is because the motion of the object matches exactly the timing of roll of the aircraft carrying the camera.

Edit to clarify.

[edit on 15-7-2010 by dainoyfb]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:30 PM
link   
Heres another one... I initially thought there were birds or insects buzzing by the camera, however the still shot at the 0:43 mark clearly shows a disc shaped object. What do you guys think? (dont mind the music)




posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:30 PM
link   
reply to post by AlphaANDOmega
 


Already posted in this thread and debunked on ATS some time ago.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by dainoyfb
reply to post by spacevisitor
 


I always thought the first video was neat too, mostly because of the eyewitness talking about the object slowing down and speeding up.

The second video (Concord footage) has been attributed to a reflection off of the stabilization optics in the camera. This is because the motion of the object matches exactly the timing of roll of the aircraft carrying the camera.

Edit to clarify.

[edit on 15-7-2010 by dainoyfb]


The second was not the concorde video, you obviously missed the one of Mr. Mark A. Olson.

You said that the (Concord footage) has been attributed to a reflection off of the stabilization optics in the camera. This is because the motion of the object matches exactly the timing of roll of the aircraft carrying the camera.

I knew that, but I do not believe that as the explanation for it.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:35 PM
link   
reply to post by GeminiSky
 



I'm fairly impressed with the one at 38 seconds in the tanker video.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by spacevisitor
I knew that, but I do not believe that as the explanation for it.


Why come?



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join