posted on Jul, 13 2010 @ 01:27 PM
There are a few things that have always bothered me about this story.
1. If he was fleeing Iran, shouldn't there be some record of him flying to the U.s?
2. If he was "fleeing" from Iran, why was he picked up in Saudia Arabia? At that point you are out of Iran, you are gone. If you were "fleeing"
and you are in another country, you were successful if "fleeing". So how the hell did you get in the US?
3. The videos he made. One says he left Iran of his own free will. The second says he was kidnapped and being held against his will. Both are damning
evidence no matter what you believe to be the truth.
4. The way this story is ending is very confusing. In one of his videos he claimed he was studying in Arizona. He was here of his own free will. So
how did he pop up in Washington D.C.?
#4 is what really has my thinking. I know for a fact, that you give your name when you travel in the U.S. If you fly, you give your name. If you take
a bus, or you take a train, you give your name. No one can deny this is a fact if you live in the U.S. and have used any of those methods to travel.
Now we also know that all these names are entered into a Database and checked for ties to Terrorism. We have been doing that since shortly after 9/11
as part of the ever expanding War On Terror. That is how we have a No Fly List that we all know to exist. Again this is fact, we all know it, it is
openly admitted and accepted.
So how does this Iranian Scientist, that the Government KNOWS is in the Country, suddenly show up in Washington D.C. and no one has any idea how he
Even if this man drove from Arizona to Washington D.C. our Government would know it. We would have video from a surveillance camera at any gas station
that he stopped at to refuel. We would have gas receipts. I know this for a fact because it happens every day when local police are making a case
against someone. Look at the D.C. Sniper case. Once he was identified, they were able to use gas receipts to show that he was in the areas of the
shootings on the days they happened. So we know it is possible, yet we have nothing. Without that, it tells me that this man was not free to travel
as he wished. It adds to the evidence that he was kidnapped by the U.S. and brought here. If we can produce that, it adds evidence to the case that
this man did in fact leave Iran of his own free will.
Yet we have nothing. Nothing at all, from either side. Knowing that the powerful sit safe and give the orders for war. Knowing that it is the common
man who fights another country's common man, following orders from the powerful and safe. I can't help but wonder if it is all bullsnip. All the
Iranian chest thumping, all the talk of Nuclear War and tactical strikes, and the US and Israel saber rattling. What if it is all just B.S. to allow
the rich to get richer and rest of us to remain in servitude through war?
No matter which side of this issue you are on. No one can deny that this story leaves a very strong aroma of bullsnip from both sides.