where are you getting your info? last i heard the Brits were trying to convince the US to extend the "compliance by" date and set up a list of
disarmament task. no hard date had been announced.
and i have no idea of the historical signifcance of going to war on the 23rd of March. so unless you explain your stance, i'm sticking to my
assumption of bombs over Baghdad in early April.
Though I have yet to see why... Funny though, I can think of many instances in my life where it's significant. Personally, I'm banking on the 18th
as go time... It should have been on the 15th of LAST month, but France and Germany kind of gummed up the works...
Mr. Bush did set a proposal that Iraq has until the 18th of March. So I guess on the 19th if Iraq does not comply with the U.N., then Mr. Bush will go
ahead anyays, even if they do.