It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
HE doesn't type complete sentences?
Originally posted by Erad3
HE doesn't type complete sentences?
This is sad to bring grammar into the argument.
Why don't you know what a gerund is?
Oh! How sad for this to be brought in.
Get out of my face you miscreant with misconception!
Originally posted by Erad3
Originally posted by Tokala42
I suggest you read this and then come back, see if that helps a little.
How stuff works: Life on the space shuttle
This didn't justify the crew is on the space shuttle.
If the NASA crew walks onto the space shuttle with a camera to record the process
then the NASA crew secretly leaves the space shuttle before the lift off to escape death.
The NASA crew walks onto the space shuttle with a camera to record the process.
Therefore, the NASA crew secretly leaves the space shuttle before the lift off to escape death.
[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]
[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]
Originally posted by Erad3
reply to post by DerekJR321
The satellites are at risk for the collision in orbit because of the space debris.
They wouldn't risk a human life with space debris.
There's not any way the crew is going to be at risk, but they're faking the challenger mission.
I will not accept that there's a crew in the space shuttle.
There is way to much incoming space debris to risk a human life.
How much fear would you have knowing about the collision of space debris?
Temperature
Oxygen/Air supply
Debris
Originally posted by Erad3
Why would they risk a human life with thousands of things that can go wrong with the program?
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by Erad3
Why would they risk a human life with thousands of things that can go wrong with the program?
Just because you can't understand the need to explore does not mean no else can either. Astronauts accept the risks, I would GLADLY accept the risks myself. Just because you can't understand that does not make the shuttle fake. In other news, the temperature of a spacecraft is dictated by its radiative properties; it is designed to hold a safe temperature when placed at the proper attitude, as is the ISS. The structure is built to handle the 1 atm difference in pressure, which isn't even that much in the grand scheme of things compared to submarines. There is not a single reason why the shuttle would have to be fake and indeed there is irrefutable evidence that its crews have built ISS in orbit.
[edit on 15-7-2010 by ngchunter]
Originally posted by Erad3
There's the possibility that a enemy government can send something explosive to collide with the NASA Space Shuttle.
There could be International conflict with space shuttle in the future because of the NASA Space Shuttle in orbit.
NASA could inflict the chance of a International Space Warfare.
Who says you couldn't create a deadly collision with the space shuttle.
Why couldn't a enemy government launch a missile to hit the space shuttle!
Originally posted by Erad3
reply to post by shiman
i have the capabilities of killing large amounts of people. would i? no.
This statement is way off topic.
You neither type complete sentences in this thread nor have relevance to this thread in a post.
I couldn't understand these inductive arguments to believe.
There isn't one poster who could accept that inductive argument.
Another poster that's a miscreant typing misconception.
[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]
Originally posted by Erad3
reply to post by DerekJR321
The satellites are at risk for the collision in orbit because of the space debris.
They wouldn't risk a human life with space debris.
There's not any way the crew is going to be at risk, but they're faking the challenger mission.
I will not accept that there's a crew in the space shuttle.
There is way to much incoming space debris to risk a human life.
How much fear would you have knowing about the collision of space debris?
[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]
Originally posted by Erad3
If there's that much risk for disaster then NASA will never send any human crew in space!
[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]
[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]