Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

All aboard with the empty NASA Space Shuttles!

page: 3
1
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 10:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by DerekJR321
reply to post by Erad3
 


YOU have not given one single iota of proof that the crew can't be in the shuttle. You simply say that is what you believe, and anyone who contradicts you is wrong.

This thread is pointless.



Please read the first post in the thread.

This thread is full of deductive arguments that I presented.




posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 10:53 AM
link   
reply to post by Erad3
 


Huh? "Proof"??


Why are you bashing the thread with no claims of proof?


The very "proof" exists right here....you have offered all the "proof" needed that this is a pointless excercise, initiated to waste people's time, by attempting to engage people in an emotional "argument".

A discussion that is inane from the outset, and has no merit.

As pointed out already, you attempted something similar, earlier. An equal failure of logic....BOTH "inductive" and "deductive". Doubt your instructor will grant you a decent grade...(unless your studies are tending toward pop-psychology??? And, not "logic"....)



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 10:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by theability
reply to post by Erad3
 


I didn't take long for me to figure you out and your posting style, nothing you say ever makes sense.

Like this person exactly! savvys84

You were banned once, you'll be banned again!


What a waste of ATS space!



That isn't a waste of ATS space because you payed attention to a create reply.

This is a sad accusation of me being an old poster.

Welcome, these are thoughts of deductive reasoning.



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 10:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Erad3
 


Huh? "Proof"??


Why are you bashing the thread with no claims of proof?


The very "proof" exists right here....you have offered all the "proof" needed that this is a pointless excercise, initiated to waste people's time, by attempting to engage people in an emotional "argument".

A discussion that is inane from the outset, and has no merit.

As pointed out already, you attempted something similar, earlier. An equal failure of logic....BOTH "inductive" and "deductive". Doubt your instructor will grant you a decent grade...(unless your studies are tending toward pop-psychology??? And, not "logic"....)




If I use logic then there will be deductive reasoning towards this thread.

Either post information about the thread or stop the off topics.

Why doesn't NASA know how much space debris is coming into the Earths atmosphere?



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by theability
reply to post by Erad3
 



You have been discovered once again savvys84

The ranting about proof, you inability to make a coherent sentence gives you away red handed.

Like I said it won't be long till you have been banned once again!


This is funny because of the I.p. addresses are not the same.

Please stop with the accusation of being another member.



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 11:07 AM
link   
Yes Bob I'll take door number three!!!!



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 11:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by Erad3

Originally posted by oubliette
It flies, because the script says it can. How else can they have filmed it in orbit


Is the crew inside the space shuttle?


Everyone except the cameraman, someone has to be outside to film



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 11:38 AM
link   
I suggest you read this and then come back, see if that helps a little.

How stuff works: Life on the space shuttle



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 11:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Erad3
 



This is funny because of the I.p. addresses are not the same.

Please stop with the accusation of being another member.


What does an IP address have to do with anything?



Answer is: NOTHING!

About like your threads, merit?

NOPE!



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 01:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Tokala42
 


He or she won't respond to your post, because simply it makes sense.

The OP I now realize is just trying to bait people into getting frustrated.

The OP will not get me frustrated.
The OP can't get me frustrated.
I am not frustrated.

There... your own logic right back at you.



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 02:05 PM
link   
Anyone who likes a good laugh Visit erad3 last profile here savvys84


Look at the way he posts about his scalar weapons theory.

This guy hasn't got a clue.



posted on Jul, 14 2010 @ 03:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by abecedarian
Look through a telescope and see the International Space Station and see it is too big to go up on one rocket.
The ISS is there and built with parts which were taken there by the Space Shuttle and assembled by its crew.
Therefore the Space Shuttle must work.

[edit on 7/13/2010 by abecedarian]

Bingo. I figured there would be more and more people like this who think the shuttle is a hoax as the program comes to an end. ISS will still be up there for some time though, providing lasting proof that the shuttle was real. That's one reason I'm trying to accumulate as many videos and images of ISS and the shuttle in orbit as I can, so that one day ten or twenty years from now when the "shuttle hoax" becomes the new "moon hoax" theory I'll have direct evidence that they're wrong.



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 12:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by DerekJR321
reply to post by Tokala42
 

The OP will not get me frustrated.
The OP can't get me frustrated.
I am not frustrated.



Therefore no one will get frustrated. At times like these though, I often feel the need to bang my head against a wall.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 12:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by Erad3
en.wikipedia.org...

Was one of your favorite toys a plastic NASA Space Shuttle?


If the design of the NASA Space Shuttle keeps the black body temperature of −454 °F from the outside orbit then the NASA Space Shuttle is at a temperature for human life.
The NASA Space Shuttle isn’t at a temperature for human life.
Hence, the design of the NASA Space Shuttle doesn’t keep the black body temperature of −454 °F from the outside orbit.

The space shuttle has insulation systems and heating systems to maintain a tempurature capable of sustaining human life.



If the air supply supports the NASA Space Shuttle mission for the time in orbit then the crew is able to breathe with the correct amount of oxygen for the time in orbit.
The crew is not able to breathe with the correct amount of oxygen for the time in orbit.
Consequently, the air supply doesn’t support the NASA Space Shuttle mission for the time in orbit

I dont see your point here, but its called stored compressed air



If the crew of the NASA mission uses a green screen then they are able to fake the mission.
The crew of the NASA mission uses a green screen.
Therefore, they are able to fake the mission.

i have the capabilities of killing large amounts of people. would i? no.



If the 0 gravity affects the human body then the crew is at risk for body failure.
The 0 gravity affects the human body.
Therefore, the crew is at risk for body failure.

the crew exercises everyday to keep their body from failing.



If the NASA Space Shuttle is with a crew in orbit then they're able to perform the mission with the conditions in orbit.
They're not able to perform the mission with the conditions in orbit.
Thus, the NASA Space Shuttle isn’t with a crew in orbit.

given my previous statements, the space shuttle has the capabilities of sustaining human life and can carry live human cargo. ergo, a crew.


If the NASA Space Shuttle is able to reenter from the orbit of the Earth then the NASA Space Shuttle is able to reenter because of the heat of 1,500 °C.
The NASA Space Shuttle isn’t able to reenter because of the heat of 1,500 °C.
Hence, the NASA Space Shuttle isn’t able to reenter the orbit of the Earth.

the space shuttle has high tempurature insulation panels on its belly, capable of keeping those high tempuratures from affecting the occupants.



If the NASA Space Shuttle is able to reenter from the orbit of Earth then the NASA Space Shuttle is in orbit.
The NASA Space Shuttle isn’t in orbit.
Therefore, the NASA Space Shuttle isn’t able to reenter from the orbit of Earth.

If the force of entry into orbit is strong enough to cause death to a human body then there’s death to a human body in entry from earth to orbit.
The force of entry into orbit is strong enough to cause death to a human body.
Hence, there’s death to a human body in entry from earth to orbit.

i dont see where your getting at, but because of the shuttle's protective design, and the technique used for reentry, the shuttle falls slower than maximum velocity.



If the force of reentry into orbit is strong enough to cause death to a human body then there’s death to a human body in reentry from earth to orbit.
The force of reentry into orbit is strong enough to cause death to a human body.
Hence, there’s death to a human body in reentry from earth to orbit.


Are you scared of what happens after ET separation?

you said the same thing twice










[edit on 13-7-2010 by Erad3]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 06:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Erad3
 





posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 01:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Tokala42
I suggest you read this and then come back, see if that helps a little.

How stuff works: Life on the space shuttle


This didn't justify the crew is on the space shuttle.

If the NASA crew walks onto the space shuttle with a camera to record the process
then the NASA crew secretly leaves the space shuttle before the lift off to escape death.
The NASA crew walks onto the space shuttle with a camera to record the process.
Therefore, the NASA crew secretly leaves the space shuttle before the lift off to escape death.


[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]

[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 01:18 PM
link   
reply to post by shiman
 




i have the capabilities of killing large amounts of people. would i? no.


This statement is way off topic.

You neither type complete sentences in this thread nor have relevance to this thread in a post.

I couldn't understand these inductive arguments to believe.

There isn't one poster who could accept that inductive argument.
Another poster that's a miscreant typing misconception.


[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 01:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erad3
reply to post by shiman
 




i have the capabilities of killing large amounts of people. would i? no.


This statement is way off topic.

You neither type complete sentences in this thread nor have relevance to this thread in a post.

I couldn't understand these inductive arguments to believe.

There isn't one poster who could accept that inductive argument.
Another poster that's a miscreant typing misconception.


[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]


HE doesn't type complete sentences?


Look, your not giving any evidence for your beliefs. Your just typing convoluted nonsense.

Space Shuttles have on-board life support systems, pressurized cabins, etc. They carry enough compressed oxygen, water, food, etc into space to sustain life.

It is the same as Submarines. They good very deep underwater. To pressures that no human being would survive in. Yet they live. I guess they are faking too.

The Space Shuttle is real
Erod3 doesn't believe space shuttles are real
Space shuttles are real.

That is your logic. Sigh....



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by DerekJR321
 


Why are they sending the crew with unknown space debris?

I would like to hear the reasons.

What is your next wish for seeing a falling star?

[edit on 15-7-2010 by Erad3]



posted on Jul, 15 2010 @ 03:00 PM
link   
Most space debris falls out of orbit.

Why don't our satellites blow up from all the space debris if you think there is so much? So the hundreds of satellites can survive but a space shuttle can't for a few days? The International Space Station can survive for years, but a shuttle couldn't?





new topics

top topics



 
1
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join