As the end to Mayan and Aztec calendars draws closer. The original date of 21 December 2012 is being hotly contested. Dates of 2011 and 2013 are also
being bandied about. Recently there was even a huge debate between Jenkins and Calleman. I would like to hear different opinions from ATS members on
whether Jenkins or Calleman seem to have it most right?
Here is a post debate summary for those who aren't up to date with the discussion.
www.alignment2012.com...
[edit on 15-6-2004 by Mynaeris]
|
Ask me again in 2014 and I'll tell you who's right.
|
refering to our calender, wouldn't that be 2013, since we started calender at 1 not 0?
[edit on 15-6-2004 by Mynaeris] 
[edit on 16-6-2004 by mrmonsoon]
|
Mynaeris, alittle advice/ Live your life and stop dwelling on a bunch of BS!
Get laid and party!!!!!!!!!!! thats life !!! personaly i think the world will end when i say it will/ Afterall Iam the God of War!
|
 Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Ask me again in 2014 and I'll tell you who's right.
What he said.
|
It really is a no brainer.
The most major alignment is set to take place Dec21 2012.
That's the date the calander is ending on.
|
Ahh ignorant people who wont accept the change that is occuring as we speak, any cataclysmic events that occur, is just earth cleansing it self of the
toxins that have been building up for billions of years.
There is about a 100 facts alone for this date, hard facts.
O and jenkins idea is better, But the best is Hwee -yong jang he takes a much more multi dimensional approach.
|
And all you people saying ooo its just another y2k, if you ever bought into y2k your nuts, 2012 actually has some structure behind it, show me the
charts and planetary alignments for 2000 yea, .
|
I havent read anything about either one yet but I can tell you that something will happen in 2012, but alot will happen over the next few years as
well.
Hilda
|
