reply to post by Blanca Rose
Thanks BR, I understand your point, but that's a default situation.
I'm talking about a proactive approach. If someone appears repeatedly in the hall of shame for example, then I’m going to be less inclined to run
with their musings, maybe pay more attention to claims from hall of Famers.
I would have thought that people who appear in the hall of shame are more likely to be more circumspect in putting forward claims based on tenuous
links.
I suppose you could argue that since predictions and prophecy aren’t exact science - typically trial and error - by condemning someone to the hall
of shame you run the risk of throwing out the baby with the bath water! Maybe.