i wonder the same thing myself, every time the subject comes up.
i just can't believe anyone would take a farce, or charade, or downright deception, so far in order to do what? transference? diversionary tactics to
keep us from realizing who the real terrorists are?
and at the expense of looking the fool to all the world? yet rightly so.
or maybe it has to do with war crimes and the previous executive staff under George W.?
there are many who still want to charge him and Rumsfield and Cheney with war crimes - if they can still claim something to do with 9/11 perhaps is
their trump card?
it stumps me!
i can't kid myself to believe that they don't know this yet, and that they didn't know it a long time ago, even when it happened.
hell, i knew somehow, even, just based on gut instinct and what i knew of his condition at the time and what i know of kidney failure from being an
i waited for years and one day i found some support of what i had suspected all along.
i was glad to know my gut was still dead-on with the info but at the same time i wanted to laugh and cry and rage all at once, because i felt so
BETRAYED somehow - suspecting it and then knowing it are two different things when it is a trust issue.
not that i have ever implicitly trusted any authorities in any level government, but this, this was way over the line!
i'm over it.
got other things to grudge about.
here is a page of evidential information, just in case you need it.
bin Laden is dead
suspecting something's rotten in denmark, er, rather afghanistan
[edit on 7/11/2010 by queenannie38]