It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by K J Gunderson
I still do not understand why all these different races of beings go by names based on the name of their location that all come from words WE MADE UP on Earth. It was cute at first to think your people just happened to come up with the same name for where you come from as us but now the entire galactic family, all far more advanced than anyone on Earth, all use the words we made up to refer to themselves? How does that happen?
Yet you have a story that tells us you have flown around on your mom's spaceship, yet still did not know for sure if you were an alien. So you got some DNA tests that also DO NOT prove you are an alien and somehow that convinced you EVEN MORE than flying on a spaceship did?
Why don't you just resurrect one of the two threads claiming to prove your alien lineage if that is all you want to do. I was enjoying those.
Originally posted by itchy_tartan_blanket
Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by yeti101
belivers arn't interested in the truth theyre more interested in confirming their belief system. Theyre not objective or able to think critically. The proof is in this thread.
You realize what a convoluted argument this is? It can be turned around.
Naysayers are not interested in the truth they're more interested in confirming their belief system. They are not objective or able to think critically. The proof is in this thread.
...and if either side has a firm predetermined belief system, almost a brainwashing, that is very hard to upend ...it is the naysayers.
The believers have already accepted and digested the new information and are able to run with it.
[edit on 13-7-2010 by rusethorcain]
But where is this truth?
That's all I want to say to this post because it's slightly off the OP topic. What naysayers are we speaking of here? Non-believers in aliens? Or those that don't believe in alien visitation based on the information available to us? We ARE interested in the truth. Surely that is evident?
The truth of the matter is, it appears some on this thread are willing to settle for a half truth. Fine, that is up to you to stop halfway in "The Quest" and hope it works out for you. I fancy your odds if I'm truthful. But right now, I won't stop hoping until I'm sure, way beyond a doubt that we've been visited.
The wild thing is, that if it was proved right now that aliens are here in their ships, all those against the thread would immediately say "Ha! We told you so!" The whole thing is a jigsaw. We can see all the pieces, and have a fair idea what the picture is, but we are just a few pieces short. And it's these pieces that will determine the whole picture. Aliens, in vessels, here on Earth. Then the picture will be complete.
A pile of building materials is not a building.
Originally posted by mikelee
OK....Roswell.
Original BREAKING STORY on that day stated flying saucer found.
What more "proof" than that? Its was obviously a cover up with no doubt. The military changed their story to fit the excuse.
After known problems that the Russians were having with their newly founded UFO, the US did not want to risk anything.
The cluster is dominated by hot blue and extremely luminous stars that have formed within the last 100 million years.
Originally posted by shasta9600
Originally posted by mikelee
OK....Roswell.
Original BREAKING STORY on that day stated flying saucer found.
What more "proof" than that? Its was obviously a cover up with no doubt. The military changed their story to fit the excuse.
After known problems that the Russians were having with their newly founded UFO, the US did not want to risk anything.
Simply put,... recovering a crashed disc is still not proof of any "ET" visitation.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by K J Gunderson
Oh he provided a reason. His race gave us the word Andromeda. Of course they gave it to the Greeks who instead of naming a galaxy after it, they named a goddess. I mean it took centuries before the galaxy was even discovered by the Persians. Then of course there's the fact that it took a while longer before it was even named Andromeda. Yet, despite all this we just so happened to take this word, whose etymology sounds Greek, but actually isn't, and apply it to the exact galaxy his people were from many of centuries later. If you ask me, it makes complete sense.
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
Aliens don't use the Human words when conversing among themselvs. Typically when talking with Humans telepathy is used, and thus communication is more like talking with "pictures". A Pleadean thinks his word, you hear/see The Pleadies. One of the advantages of telepathy; requires no translation.
But, the terrestrial names of star systems visitors come from are purely in the minds of Humans.
Originally posted by rusethorcain
reply to post by K J Gunderson
What a charmer you are.
The stars are perfect white dots. If this were time exposure wouldn't they be extended as well?
For whatever it is worth to you, I NEVER mentioned evidence. Because........
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
reply to post by butcherguy
For what ever its worth, nobody has succeeded in "poking" any holes in my evidence yet. Some have tried, but failed.
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by yseeker32
They look like balloons to me too.
Why on earth are people so into hoaxing UFO's?
but a lot is just stupid and pointless.
Why? I really don't get it.
Who does this stuff?