Show us ONE, just one UFO pic or ANY evidence that can be proven as evidence of visitation.

I like this thread here on ATS started back in 2008...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Source:140 years of UFO sightings - Part I


There are a few pics there that i have never seen before, and seeing as they are from way before CGi and other forms of image manipulation was possible, i'd be keen on others views here.

The ones that baffle me are pictures 1, 3, 11, 18 and 29.

CX.

reply to post by alienreality


Yea, in all of my searches that is the best picture I have ever come across that doesn't make me question its validity. There are more pictures of this crash too, and from different angles. That in and of itself led me to believe even more in the pics.

With all of the other fakes out there, I have kind of given up on trying to find evidence, and I mean rock solid hard evidence. I believe they do exist and are visiting, if not living on Earth. Just look at how everything was prior to the first UFO crash and then technology has evolved exponentially. So the way I see it is we will eventually have public contact with ETs. I just pray it is in my lifetime. Something tells me it will be, but anything can be held back with how the world governments have managed to keep it secret this long. I for one, am just sick and tired of trying to sift through all the garbage that is out on the net now.

What about Alien Star Charts?

From here: www.abduct.com...

There is a guy, Manuel and a lady Lyn who both claimed they were abducted and were both shown star charts. There are many similarities in both of their star maps.

Granted, there have been stories other than this I have heard about.. people with knowledge they could not have known from ordinary sources.

While not proof exactly, I do think there is enough merit in these stories to cause pause and reflection of the possibility these could really be of extraterrestrial origin.

Also note the term extraterrestrial only means not of this world.. it does not have to mean from another planet. It could mean another dimension.

[edit on 12-7-2010 by JohnPhoenix]

This here is all the proof you need :

www.slate.com...

Reclassified documents that were previously declassified. Right about the time of the Foo Fighter incidents (not only a good alternative band but also the name of the unexplained light vessels believed to be own by each side) . Most of it is mundane, but the boom of technology and the events of 1947 could probably be explained further.

Ohh and don't fourget the battle of los angeles

reply to post by neformore


Hey there mr mod , this is my first time replying to a moderator.
I just wanted to say hello and that im a believer but i refuse to jump on every pic and idea that comes out , ive just looked at the link you posted and have never heard of it before but will defo be looking into it as it looks quite facinating. thanks

reply to post by neformore


If you are talking to me, it goes in the unexplained file.
But I see nothing at all that indicates spaceships or aliens.
Many things are unexplained. That just means we don't know the answer!

reply to post by KpxMarMoTT


I don't see the proof in your post.
I'm at work, so I did skim it.
I allready stated what I thought about the battle of LA.

Same old argument.

There is a lot of evidence. Too much to be ignored.
But there is only speculation as to what it is evidence of.

Some people hope for "aliens," like those from Star Trek or Star Wars.
Others think human time travelers.
Others think demons or fallen angels.
Or whatever.

In any case, without having recognized proof of there even being aliens out there, even alien microbes (and the Drake Equation, and "the universe is too big for their NOT to be aliens," is conjecture, not proof), then connecting the dots between UFOs and aliens can't be done. Because aliens are not a dot. They're still a question mark.

All we have so far is one dot. We can guess, but we have no proof of what it connects to.

Originally posted by neformore
reply to post by OldDragger

 

You never replied to this

Am just curious as to your take on it.

It's a real triangular craft.

But the OP was looking for proof of Alien visitation... this is simply an unidentified aircraft. People make technologically advanced aircraft. No Alien or Alien spacecraft have ever been produced for public scrutiny, so the "Logical" conclusion is that it is an advanced aircraft of terrestrial origin.

[edit on 12-7-2010 by draknoir2]

for the 3rd time on ATS.. not sure that anyone has even looked at this image..

here is a lightship which I have seen myself.. thus I at least know that these are 'about' within the earth reality from time to time..
I am also aware of why many people do not see them..
This was to some extent explored in the sense that I was surrounded by 60,000 people at a concert when I saw it overhead (LOW in altitude) and yet as far as I know the only other person who has acknowledged seeing it was 100 miles away.

It is an issue of the frequency you are resonating.. essentially an issue of whether or not you are open to the experience and whether or not there is a purpose to the interaction.




you can find a movie made about the guy who took this photo and watch video of the craft too.. search for 'carlos diaz'..

I have now seen 16 such lightships in different places in the UK.

I am not aware of the origin of the vehicle in terms of any particular group of beings.. the plasma type light energy was most certianly present though..
you are welcome to lie detector me! lol

Originally posted by OldDragger

Show us ONE, just one UFO pic or ANY evidence that can be proven as evidence of visitation

First off, I don't want to be snarky since I do appreciate most of your posts, but your Headline is a bit contradictory..

UFO...UNIDENTIFIED Flying Object

So by your asking for proof of UFO's or pics...technically there is a tonnage of pics and evidence for "UNIDENTIFIED" Flying Objects...

But on to your actual meaning...

The Rendlesham Forest / Bentwaters case always stood out to me as it invloved multiple members of the Military trained in arial observation...who got up close to the object when it landed in the forrest, their stories matched and the object resembled no known craft at the time, there was physical evidence in radioactivity and depressions in the earth from the landing sight.

Here is a decent site with associated documentation including documents the British Ministry of Defense released concerning the incident..
www.ufoevidence.org...

reply to post by OldDragger


Guess I skimmed a few pages as well, cause I had not read what you thought about it...

You want proof that they exist?

www.ctv.ca...

The vatican seems to agree:

www.cbsnews.com...

How's about the french governement saying that it believes the phenomenon is about out of this world objects and that their occupants are not of this world and that the us governement has most likelly been into direct contact.

en.wikipedia.org...

and this is available in the commetta report

en.wikipedia.org...

I would say that is proof enough... wouldnt you? (unless you are but skimming the proof)


[edit on 12-7-2010 by KpxMarMoTT]

reply to post by maybereal11


Yes it's interesting, but hardly conclusive and again, not proof of anything.
I myself have seen unexplained things ( though I think I know what they were), but never anything alien.

reply to post by maybereal11


Yes it's interesting, but hardly conclusive and again, not proof of anything.
I myself have seen unexplained things ( though I think I know what they were), but never anything alien.

reply to post by HobsonsChoice


A UFO is not an alien spaceship. It can be but it is not automatically extra-terrestrial.

You didn't mention anything about seeing any other beings, except for your friend , so how do you know this was an alien vessel or ship? You assume it was an alien ship because you couldn't identify it. It was an Unidentified Flying Object. If it is unidentifiable, as you say, then how can you identify it as an alien vessel? It is accounts like this that puzzle me. I am not saying you didn't experience this event. Far from it. All I want to know is how and why people automatically assume a UFO is an alien visitor when the said UFO is "unidentifiable".... know what I mean? If you were to say that this event is what makes you say that aliens visit the Earth for sure, then I would have to ask how you came to this assumption if you didn't see any aliens? It was my Uncle Graeme that was flying your object. Yuri Gagarin and Elvis were part of the crew too. Not aliens. Think about it.....

Keep looking up man...

ok so let me get this straight, you say you want a photo of a UFO that is not "unexplained"? well then it wouldn't be a UFO would it? c'mon

reply to post by aussiebergie


The Roswell video has been debunked I'm afraid and while I suppose it looked real, so did District 9. If we all believed in what we see then we'd truly be screwed. Especially me watching some of the movies that I watch

reply to post by KpxMarMoTT


Did you even read the articles.
The Canadian guy is entitled to his opinion, but that's all it is. The story even says so. Nowhere does he claim any direct knowlegde anyway.

The vatican acknowleges the possability of life elsewhere.
So do I. Nowhere do they claim visitation.

All those things you cite are opinion, not fact or proof!
Jeeez guys!

They are all government projects in my personal opinion not fake just not public knowledge at the present time.

[edit on 12-7-2010 by UnidentifiedObject]

p.s. The recent thread that was started on this forum that claimed that there would be a mass lightbeing sighting around the whole planet last saturday was made from a profile that had only posted 7 posts..

when I attempted to create a new thread I was informed that I need to post 20 posts first..

since there were no lightbeings encompassing the earth in visible light spectrum (in my reality) I am further inspired to enquire as to why the poster of that thread was able to post without having made 20 posts already..?!

anyone?