It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is my general observation that the majority of personnel on this web site far prefer fantasy issues to those that have and will affect our real daily lives. Can anyone explain to my why this tendency exists?
Originally posted by Truth1000
There is a reason people have so many different kinds of interests, because each person has lived a life that is unique to their own experiences. For that reason, there are many topics and boards available for the different types of issues each person finds interesting.
However, some issues are globally important. If we go to war, why did we go to war? Why are we putting the lives of our young people in the way of danger?
When our government chooses to create financial policy that is contrary to the good of the masses, yet is beneficial to a very small, already rich people, why do we not hold our leaders responsible?
When we use and abuse the people of other nations around the world, and allow our leaders to perform actions that are absolutely against the wishes of the American public, that is highly important to virtually all Americans. The other citizens of the world will hold us accountable, yet we fail to react accordingly. Why shouldn't the people of other nations become upset with our actions?
While all people are able to look for those topics that interest them personally, when the option of having these type of actions explained are ignored, and not supported, why then do these same people claim they are upset that more disclosures are not revealed?
These types of issues truly affect the daily lives of a majority of our citizens, rather than small groups of people with particularly unique experiences.
Therefore the question remains, what types of "truths" actually are acceptable for discussion in this format?
Therefore the question remains, what types of "truths" actually are acceptable for discussion in this format?