reply to post by jokei
If it is still here, it has not been resolved. Many Blessings
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by Saul of Tarsus
I find your title to be very judgmental, to make your own stance look 'good'.
I dont find God holding it against anyone for needing to only believe what they can see or know. God is understanding...and will offer to all what they are in need of. Being content with your inner self, is a big part of what we all are in need of. Not seeking rewards in the after life, just living the best you know how with honest intentions, being humble enough to not place yourself above others.....these are important attributes that a non believer can have.
I dont think its about banking our soul on a belief, I think its about a weighing of our inner nature, what kind of person we are.
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by Saul of Tarsus
I rest my case
But your case is flawed, and is not sound.
If they reset, then they would see that being an atheist requires a bigger belief system than any other."
Their stance does not stand on a 'belief' at all....they accept things they can observe, study, figure, reason with, understand. There is nothing wrong with that. It doesnt keep anyone from being a good person, which is what matters.
There are those that believe, and are only good people, because they await rewards for being 'good'. This is not honest, this is not true intentions.
[edit on 10-7-2010 by LeoVirgo]
[edit on 10-7-2010 by LeoVirgo]
Originally posted by IamBoon
reply to post by Saul of Tarsus
Non-belief in god is a belief. That is in contrary howver to the assertion that any human can make regarding any "gods" so far revealed in any religion. YOu see , those gods have attributes , histories, philosophies and such as written by their diviners and books. Those gods can without any reasonable doubt have their existence curtailed into the realm of non-existence .
This is really simpleton logic for anyone who knows anything about belief systems. To make my point clear , you cannot prove nor disprove ANYTHING you have no device to measure , feel, or is abstract in interpretation. Is art art?
However once an idea gains attributes and philosophies it IS possible to either find them sound in reasoning and scope ,or in the contrary , send them to the wasting pits of deluded reasoning and non-existence.
We should be talking about WHY Atheist tend to dismiss the beliefs they do instead. Just like Atheists make their points on solid logical ground.
Originally posted by darkbake
reply to post by Saul of Tarsus
Completely amazing! I totally agree with you. Religion is a partial blockage because it keeps you from reaching your full potential by holding you back, and atheism is just total crap because, and I am not joking, the very fact that atheists do not believe in free will and that we can create our own reality and that we have a spirit and that we can bring new ideas into the system stifles their growth completely. A lot of those things can be proven scientifically. What is creativity but reaching into the unknown and bringing into the world what wasn't here before?
Quantum physics and string theory completely explains how what you say is possible, however the atheist scientific community is totally being a pain in the ass about it. They won't be able to stonewall it forever, though.
And yes, there is probably an afterlife, and yes, there is probably a creator, a creating force of some kind.
[edit on 11-7-2010 by darkbake]
[edit on 11-7-2010 by darkbake]
Originally posted by Saul of Tarsus
reply to post by jokei
If I accused you falsely, please accept my apology, your referring me to the rules and yours being the last post on the closed thread was my clue. Assuming that I have only read one book during all my incarnations on this planet is your prerogative. I offer however that wisdom is not found in books but in awareness. Many Blessings
- the comment actually meant
that you were sinking your belief into one book - that let's face it has a questionable history (which edition are you choosing etc) as opposed to
many books (Science, philosophy, sociology etc) that are very well researched and sourced. I was not in any way assuming your whole scope of reading
material and can only assume you've purposely misinterpreted my statement to further your (shoddy) rhetoric.