It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
A very good point. I can't really help to do anything about the bias associated with my own foe list, but still the aggression and anger associated with being a foe indicates that it in fact means *something* to them, and is likely associated with a reward and punishment system. They feel punished because they were foe'd and see's I have foed "everybody" and gets angry due to the unwarranted punishment in the users eyes. It does slightly affect the experiment but not in any way that is severely detrimental (they would be already exhibiting an angered response.) In future experiments I should be more careful.
Reward — but don't over-reward — participants. Rewarding people for contributing will help motivate users who have lives outside the Internet, and thus will broaden your participant base. Although money is always good, you can also give contributors preferential treatment (such as discounts or advance notice of new stuff), or even just put gold stars on their profiles. But don't give too much to the most active participants, or you'll simply encourage them to dominate the system even more. www.useit.com...
Originally posted by WolfofWar
reply to post by blupblup
Yup. I've been logging the various reactions I've been getting. It's a social experiment to see how important web 2.0 based social networking functions are to people on ATS. I had a hypothesis three years back that the new implementation of these systems were going to make people needy and wanting of acceptance, and as a result suffer a drop in quality and a drastic change in board behavior. Three years later, we have packs of roaming cults of personality, following specific people around, not contributing to a thread besides "I can't wait til gets here" and mass starring and flagging to get acceptance. The experiment relied on logging the emotional responses I received: anybody showing angry, resent, or any negative emotion pointing to an impact upon their psyche was considered a "hit." I initially thought that the older members would be more resilient to this, and the newer members would be more susceptible, do to their initial exposure to the social networking algorithms produced on the site. I was in fact quite wrong, and as my data set grew it was pretty much even between old guard and new.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
However, first I must know this: What is the criteria?
What is your criteria, sir?
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by EnlightenUp
Well then, I seem to have been disrepectful of his assertions and posts.
Originally posted by EnlightenUp
I never heard of you-- most likely because we have no common interests-- until someone pointed me to this thread. You were always insignificant to me and will likely continue to be until the sun takes its last gulp of hydrogen.
PS. I just posted here because I wanted to get some BTS points.
[edit on 7/14/2010 by EnlightenUp]
Originally posted by WolfofWar
I believe that's a "hit." I'll have to change your poll data.
Originally posted by WolfofWar
reply to post by EnlightenUp
Still was a hit.
data has been recorded, thank you for your participation.
Originally posted by yuefo
I'm still wondering why you're advertising Japanese condoms.
Originally posted by yuefo
I'm still wondering why you're advertising Japanese condoms.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/09404c880138.jpg[/atsimg]
Originally posted by Stop-loss!
How can you tell if its even related to condoms? You got any proof?
Originally posted by WolfofWar
I think the relation between me and condoms should be self evident.
Oh, the winner has been chosen, congratulations Enlighten.
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by WolfofWar
I don't believe you.
You joined ATS in 2003, and began the journey of your greatest ATS *accomplishment* to date, as a serial foe-er. (Yes, you are the Ted Bundy of foeing, you can have that award, congrats, what-ev)
According to your birthday, in 2003 you were 15, amost 16 years old the day you signed up here.
You will now have us believe you were engaging in a study of this nature for seven years, since you were 15 years old? Pfft.