Leaked!: Complete Assay Of The "Crude oil" & Corexit Warning Label

page: 6
110
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 11 2010 @ 08:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by DClairvoyant

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by brokedown
 






Barium = Radioactive compound. Also remember how the dispersant was used from conventional spraying system's jet-sprayed from the wings of a plane flying at low altitude to spray the Corexit 9500 onto the crude oil.

Barium is also USED in Chemtrails.



Oh-Oh, it's back to high school chemistry.
First. Bairum is not a compound!!! It is an element. Big difference. It is an alkali earth metal, Atomic Number 56.
Secondly, Barium, the natural element, is NOT radioactive. With the right equipment, you can synthesize isotopes of Ba (22 of them) that are mildly radioactive (.5 to 11.7 MeV). These isotopes have short half-lives with the longest, Ba130, having a half-life of about 11 days.
And since you find Ba in oil, it is not at all surprising that you would find traces of the element in the contrails formed by the combustion of gasoline or kerosene (jet-fuel).




posted on Jul, 11 2010 @ 08:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by Astroved
 


To think the unthinkable...no amount of money in the world will wooth those mens souls if it was intentional. Some day the darkeness the engulfs them will be darker and suffocate them just like the oil.

The destruction is set, too much has been lost and will not be recovered anytime in the near future.

I did a thread on Prince William Sound www.abovetopsecret.com...

Recent Photos From Prince William Sound




...The Oil from The Valdez is still there! Check out the video in that thread, the marine biologist says you can still smell the oil now 20 years later


Thank you, BurntheShips, for the links!

Astroved



posted on Jul, 11 2010 @ 09:41 AM
link   
reply to post by burntheships
 


The only Information is it made by Nalco
It doesn't say "made for", They could have a factory in India but
it would still be made by Nalco.



posted on Jul, 11 2010 @ 11:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Astroved
reply to post by BrokenCar
 


Thank you, BurntheShips, for posting this info!

BrokenCar, isn't it obvious that the ONLY reason BP would use something as toxic as Corexit 9500, when other safer & MORE EFFECTIVE oil dispersants exist AND not allow workers to use safety gear is because they WANT people to be poisoned!!!





You may be right, but I think the more likely reason is the have a financial tie to the company they are buying the stuff from.

IT's funny to me how people package their opinions as fact. Is it the CAPS LOCK that makes one think stating an opinion strongly makes it more valid?


have a day!

[edit on 11-7-2010 by justadood]



posted on Jul, 11 2010 @ 12:58 PM
link   

It is not surprising that some in industry would want to use Corexit. According to media reports, Nalco, the producers of Corexit, stand to make $800 thousand to $6.5 million per day from dispersant sales. Nalco's board of directors includes a former BP executive and board member.

What is surprising, however, is that a major federal agency, tasked with protecting the public, would allow industry to call the shots.

It is an outrage that Corexit continues to jeopardize both the health of the public and of the Gulf marine life exposed to the chemical. Both the EPA and BP are to blame, with the former allowing the latter to shoot first, ask questions later (and act surprised when the answer involves documented toxicity). This is why, despite the Administration's claim that they are demanding answers from BP, it is we who must demand that our government stop asking BP what they intend to do and start telling them what they are required to do.

www.huffingtonpost.com...



posted on Jul, 11 2010 @ 01:41 PM
link   









one thing for sure.... the boss is f***ki** with us.... better start to believe with your own mind... see around youuuuuuu then you will understand 2012



posted on Jul, 11 2010 @ 11:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Illuminati_2012
 


Great Videos, thank you!


reply to post by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
 


This one is for you!


Thanks to IgnoranceIsntBliss for bringing more light to the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs!



The burning of the spill on the open water and by the Q4000, the oilfield construction vessel now collecting and burning oil and gas at the Deepwater site around the clock, creates extremely hazardous byproducts. Since the burning is happening so close to the water, the relative coolness of the water keeps the flames from destroying as much of the oil and gas as they would normally, most likely mutating rather than destroying a large amount of chemicals. The resulting chemicals are termed “products of incomplete combustion,” or PICs.

PICs produced would include highly carcinogenic chemicals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, according to Schade, which are known to damage human DNA and contribute to birth defects. “They are much worse than the typical straight-chain hydrocarbons,” Schade said. “You should definitely stay away from that smoke plume. … Anyone who is working out there is at much greater risk.”

That plume is 60 miles southeast of Grand Isle, Louisiana, and frequently blows toward land.
www.sacurrent.com...



[edit on 11-7-2010 by burntheships]



posted on Jul, 12 2010 @ 12:44 PM
link   
Toxicity is rising from the combination of Corexit, and the crude oil!


While most of the attention so far has been on the millions of gallons of oil that have escaped from the damaged BP rig in the Gulf of Mexico, many environmentalists are now wondering if the real danger to humans from this whole crisis may be the massive amounts of benzene and hydrogen sulfide that are escaping into the air. Hydrogen sulfide is a chemical asphyxiant, similar to carbon monoxide and cyanide gases. It causes "biochemical suffocation" by inhibiting cellular respiration and the uptake of oxygen. Benzene is a highly carcinogenic gas that can cause death if inhaled at high enough concentrations. Not only that, benzene has been shown to cause leukemia in all its forms.

High levels of both gases have been detected at testing stations in the Gulf of Mexico. In addition, it is being reported that many fishermen in the Gulf that have been assisting with cleanup efforts have been getting seriously ill from breathing that air. There have been reports of symptoms including headaches, nausea, dizziness, burning eyes, coughing, sore throats, and stuffy sinuses. So as this oil spill continues and even more of these gases are released, are people across the southeast United States about to start breathing air that is filled with highly toxic gases?
endoftheamericandream.com...


On May 14 WWLTV in New Orleans ran a report on the levels of Hydrogen Sulfide and Benzene in the air at that time. 5-10 parts per billion is the established allowable amount for Hydrogen Sulfide. WWLTV reported that on May 3 the level was recorded at 1,192 ppb. Pastor Williams said his sources report the level detected in the Gulf at 1,200 ppb and the amount poses a serious and even fatal health risk
www.prisonplanet.com...

www.wwltv.com...



posted on Jul, 12 2010 @ 12:51 PM
link   
07/11/2010 Evidence of hidden oil on the Gulf of Mexico sea floor.



posted on Jul, 23 2010 @ 09:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by BlubberyConspiracy
Be careful.

TPTB want us to notice that the EPA 'kindly' asked BP not to use corexit and then get angry at how the EPA has no power to enforce BP to not use the corexit.

Then the Cap and Trade comes in.

Obama wants the EPA to have policing powers, nothing other than this could have us all blindly screaming create an environmental police force.


This is how ruthless the elite are.



Algore failed.

Climate Summit failed.

And this is the third attempt.


yet another failed partisan disinfo campaign from the republicans in hiding...

"Democrats Call Off Climate Bill Effort"



Bowing to political reality, Senator Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat and majority leader, said the Senate would not take up legislation intended to reduce carbon emissions blamed as a cause of climate change, but would instead pursue a more limited measure focused on responding to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and tightening energy efficiency standards.


www.nytimes.com...





new topics
top topics
 
110
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join