It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaulGoodman
This reminds me of that guy who thinks Lady Gaga was manufactured by the Illuminati (vigilantcitizen.com...). I don't know if that's the OP's thinking, like, "Hey, look at all these covered eyes, something is up," but the idea seems kind of silly. I think covering one eye will just always be considered cool and because we're in the 21st century, people are eschewing eyepatches. Maybe if Snake Pliskin ever makes an album we'll see some straight forward eye covering, until then these kids will just use hands and hair.
Originally posted by Osiris1953
I don't think that it is even remotely odd that a large number of the saccharine, homogenized, untalented "musicians" in the world have also taken to having similar album covers. I don't look in the toilet and wonder why one turd looks like another. When everything about the music industry lacks individualism and creativity, why should album cover art be any different.