It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Also i can't help notise the search light on the helicopter is pointing in front not down i have only ever seen this with a commercial airliner never a helicopter and i see them twice a night or more for the past 15yrs ???
Anybody?
Originally posted by DGFenrir
Do we have photos of the real UFO? The object in the article's photo is clrealy not hovering.
Originally posted by AlienCarnage
reply to post by YouCanCallMeKM
I don’t think anyone was ignoring your post, but this has been discussed in full during this entire thread.
Originally posted by BRITWARRIOR
Didn't the original report say the object was on radar and could only be observed in IR and that the public would not have seen this object ???
it appears already there is Disinformation circulating bareing all the haul marks of a cover up, ...
Originally posted by AlienCarnage
Possibly a missile, but others have told us they do not show up on radar, this I do not know as I am not an expert, or is this explanation another misdirection?
Originally posted by Smiler74
from what I can gather the object hovered near the airport for an hour ?
if so, then how can it be a missile ? and surely a missile would be VERY HIGH ??
Originally posted by GW8UK
So ive just sat and read through 16 pages and the only conclusion thats been came up with is.....
What the Air traffic controllers said is a UFO...........
Is not a helicopter!!!!!!
Whoa well done team..
Why dont you all stop arguing and wait for the cover story to come out, then the real debunking can start
Originally posted by GW8UK
So ive just sat and read through 16 pages and the only conclusion thats been came up with is.....
What the Air traffic controllers said is a UFO...........
Is not a helicopter!!!!!!
Whoa well done team..
Why dont you all stop arguing and wait for the cover story to come out, then the real debunking can start
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by YouCanCallMeKM
theres no information in regards to how far away the supposed object was. Reports say it was too far away for eye witnesses at the airport to see it and was only detetected by electronic means. If it was just a blip on a radar screen they wouldnt know what it was.
we havnt been given the location of the object was it in the flight path of incoming planes? thousands of feet above or below? how many miles away was it? what speed was it doing? which direction was it heading?
with such little information nothing, including a helicopter, can be ruled out.
Originally posted by Fryaga
reply to post by YouCanCallMeKM
Hey YouCan, I can understand your frustration on people ignoring your posts, as there have been several posts covering the OP image in detail which you have obviously ignored/bypassed.
Case in point - www.abovetopsecret.com...
Just click the link and observe for yourself, please. There is no bandwagon.
*edit - and again I stress, none of us have said that it was a helicopter that caused the incident at the airport in any way, shape, or form.
What the topic of debunking has been over is the image from the OP.
- Fry
[edit on 9-7-2010 by Fryaga]