It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Logarock
What I am trying to say is that your are pulling it down to a low point. Common denominators like... we are capable of procreating without it... While a fact this even has issues of its oun it really doesnt confront the issue. Nor does all sex is an indulgence.
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by Logarock
So you have no answer for it then. Gotcha.
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by Logarock
I dont subscribe to the modern school of debate. And you know what I am talking about.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I guess you mean that NEW style of facts and locic. i guess you can rely on the OLD debate where you simply ignore things that don't support your position.
Why doesn't the anti gay crowd just admit that gays just bug and disgust on a gut level them and therefore should have no rights?! THAT, at least would be honest.
Is it because that would lay on the line how morally vapid and sick their position is? Just wondering!
Originally posted by 23refugee
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by Logarock
I dont subscribe to the modern school of debate. And you know what I am talking about.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I guess you mean that NEW style of facts and locic. i guess you can rely on the OLD debate where you simply ignore things that don't support your position.
I mean the new style of win at all costs even if the truth is sloppy as long as it sounds good and the opponet cant answer. I mean really fellas...the black civil rights struggle, mixed marriage, using the half of the bible you didnt tear out.
Whatever... good show...a respectfully depart...good row.
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by mryanbrown
Well ok ...yes...tomcat wont get a pass....but it looks like gay sex is always going to be on the list. In the case of hetro marriage a vail is over what goes on in the bed room....even if its rank. The word also says the bed is sanctified in marriage and there is no way the gay bed is going to sanctify gay marriage.
Originally posted by Logarock
What I am trying to say is that your are pulling it down to a low point. Common denominators like... we are capable of procreating without it... While a fact this even has issues of its oun it really doesnt confront the issue. Nor does all sex is an indulgence.
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by Logarock
I see you skipped over my posts again? Don't you like me?
Originally posted by mryanbrown
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by mryanbrown
Well ok ...yes...tomcat wont get a pass....but it looks like gay sex is always going to be on the list. In the case of hetro marriage a vail is over what goes on in the bed room....even if its rank. The word also says the bed is sanctified in marriage and there is no way the gay bed is going to sanctify gay marriage.
There is NO definitive world view on marriage or the sanctity of the bedroom.
And what the hell does...
"the bed is sanctified in marriage and theres no way a gay bed is going to sanctify gay marriage"
Do you know what the hell sanctified means? In most cases of heterosexual marriage, the marriage IS NOT sanctified PERIOD. Meaning the bed can not be.
But stop trying to pretend YOU are the one doing it right.
[edit on 10-7-2010 by mryanbrown]
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by mryanbrown
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by mryanbrown
Well ok ...yes...tomcat wont get a pass....but it looks like gay sex is always going to be on the list. In the case of hetro marriage a vail is over what goes on in the bed room....even if its rank. The word also says the bed is sanctified in marriage and there is no way the gay bed is going to sanctify gay marriage.
There is NO definitive world view on marriage or the sanctity of the bedroom.
And what the hell does...
"the bed is sanctified in marriage and theres no way a gay bed is going to sanctify gay marriage"
Do you know what the hell sanctified means? In most cases of heterosexual marriage, the marriage IS NOT sanctified PERIOD. Meaning the bed can not be.
But stop trying to pretend YOU are the one doing it right.
[edit on 10-7-2010 by mryanbrown]
That bed sanctified in marriage comment comes from Paul. Its simply a poetic way of saying that marriage takes the question or qestions out of the issue of sex....say like questions about sex before marriage.
On that last line there.....sorry cant do that
He went to the front and gave himself to God... He is now a big time preacher who ministers to th LGBT community.. He is married with kids.. All because we just loved on him and let God do the work... And He did indeed...
Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by Logarock
Got to hand it to you!
you will be a God lovin' queer, uh, disliking, homphobic, hide prejudice behind religion neanderthal thinkin boy till the end! Reminds me of the good ol boys that swore they would never accept no 'n-word's! Good company! You are amazing.
Originally posted by mryanbrown
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by mryanbrown
Originally posted by Logarock
reply to post by mryanbrown
But stop trying to pretend YOU are the one doing it right.
[edit on 10-7-2010 by mryanbrown]
That bed sanctified in marriage comment comes from Paul. Its simply a poetic way of saying that marriage takes the question or qestions out of the issue of sex....say like questions about sex before marriage.
On that last line there.....sorry cant do that
If the marriage is not sanctified, then the bed isn't sanctified. Because everything that takes place in the bed is unsanctioned. Get it?
I must understand what you mean by an unsanctified marriage. Are you catholic?
But yea I said as much about gay marriage.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Logarock
I decided to read the history of marriage,
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Logarock
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Logarock
I decided to read the history of marriage,
en.wikipedia.org...
What a nightmare. God if I thought is was just a contract I would have stayed single and paid for whores on the weekend.