It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A federal district court judge in Boston today struck down a 1996 federal law that defines marriage as a union exclusively between a man and a woman, according to the office of state Attorney General Martha Coakley.
Judge Joseph L. Tauro, in a 36-page ruling that touched on the history of marriage laws, found that the federal Defense of Marriage Act violates Massachusetts’ right to recognize same-sex unions.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Good, I'm happy the legal system is finally coming around to the idea.
Equal rights for all.
I don't think the government should be in marriage at all though, that needs to change, but so long as being "married" provides more benefits that just being a couple, gay folk should have a right to do so.
~Keeper
Originally posted by Steve8511
Yes! If they are allowing a bedroom fetish to marry and have full benefits I’m going to get 10 wives !!! Yahoo!
If one whacked out fetish get recognized all should-right? They are not special.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
My comment was in regards to the fact that if the system is not willing to change for the better (ie. removing government from marriage) then the system needs to incorporate ALL people under the law to make it equal and fair.
Originally posted by Steve8511
You see they Gov has to open the flood gates now. People don’t think.
All “special”, alternative love/fetish/need/beliefs all carry the same weight now.