It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Cigar Shaped Metallic UFO Spotted Over UK June 2010

page: 4
21
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 05:09 PM
link   
Interesting, it looks a hell of a lot like something i saw over melbourne.
It looked like a rocket launch the one i saw, but as far as i know there are no rocket bases around here....it had a glowing "head" on it and a trail behind it like this one does....the trail stopped and the head went up into space.

i took a crappy picture of it, but i only had my iphone with me...you can just make it out....but it was very similar to this...it looked like a meteor, but it was headed up. It took about 10 minutes from when i saw it to when it looked like it exited the atmosphere.
The people in the balloon must have surely seen it also, i was going to call the balloon company, but then i thought others may not exactly share my enthusiasm and decided not to.

Apologies for terrible photo, but it did look pretty much the same as the one in that video.


how odd.




posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 05:10 PM
link   
First I must state that despite looking I have not yet seen anything even resembling a UFO. However, I have seen plenty of evidences presented by others. Now also the video presented in this thread. I will simply state my opinion in a few straight to the point words and then leave you to scratch your heads.

My opinion is that the UFO phenomenon where ever it is manifesting it self is 100% paranormal in origin. It is in the same category as ghosts. Indeed a UFO is a ghost. Ghosts are not always human or animal in form. They also are UFO in form. My own ghosts were human in form. But mostly my ghosts are just audio traffic. In fact a "UFO type ghost" is similar in structure to a plant or a single cell organism or like a jelly fish.

I recommend that everyone get to see the movie THE FOURTH KIND. After you see that you will start to realise that UFO are certainly not nuts and bolts "aircraft" of the regular military. Which is what I used to think them to be. Although the regular military might eventually acquire such advanced trans-dimensionality technology ? The ultimate in stealth being not just camoflage, but actually ghost like invisibility, and also being able to pass through brick walls like ghosts do. UFO, being ghosts, do actually pass through solid objects and matter. UFO frighten me just like ghosts do too.

[edit on 7/7/2010 by CAELENIUM]



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 05:17 PM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


Yes it does go into or over the cloud LMAO and clearly, the cloud is not thick enough to make it disappear completely its just abit of mist like vapor not a super cell, it just goes grey in color passing through (the object does), im not going to comment you further your obviously having a joke with me or your watching the wrong video,

0:18s - 0:24s One more time

[edit on 7-7-2010 by BRITWARRIOR]



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 05:33 PM
link   
"People wont get it, even when UFO's are flying over their head"


Humans,



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 05:39 PM
link   
reply to post by whatwesaygoes
 


Thank you! Once you orient yourself, it is obvious that it is something rising as the camera zooms out. This video is a member of that burgeoning new genre: "normal things that look weird and mysterious when taped in IR and called a UFO."



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 05:41 PM
link   
I thought it was a video in daylight, maybe I'm wrong about that? but there is almost constant shadow to one side which is very black at the opposing end to where the light is. So, if it is daytime what..... is the point of launching a Chinese lantern. Yes, I see them every fart's end, but only ever at night, but then, and also if you are a hoaxer, launch one in daylight and film the effect, and play around with it like Torsion has said. At least the filmer got a few fairly distinctive shots. enough for people to theorise about very quickly. Sometimes the posts here at ATS are like the two critics on the Muppet show, first of all it's great, then it's just okay, then it's rubbish and then it's great again!!!



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by whatwesaygoes
 


Thank you! Once you orient yourself, it is obvious that it is something rising as the camera zooms out. This video is a member of that burgeoning new genre: "normal things that look weird and mysterious when taped in IR and called a UFO."


You can absolutely tell the reversed video is in reverse, wot is that telling you?

Also when its at its peak (just before the footage cuts out, it looks like we are looking at the earth from a NASA space mission LOL, again wot does that tell you.


Also its not actually flying straight up its flying sideways up in that scandalous reversed footage, again wot does this tell you...?

To make this Reversed footage work and fit into your ideology you need to tilt your head 45 degrees to the left, otherwise this things is moving sideways up and then you will have all the above problems to debunk,

If this was the original footage it would not sit very well with many but nice idea & effort but its not reversed! everybody told you that from the very begin of the thread,

I think maybe this thread is going in the same direction.



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:19 PM
link   
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR
 



Also its not actually flying straight up its flying sideways up in that scandalous reversed footage, again wot does this tell you...?


It tells you it was being blown by the wind... which is what you'd expect from a balloon, but not a weird metal craft travelling hundreds of miles per hour at 20,000 feet.



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by torsion

Originally posted by YouCanCallMeKM
reply to post by torsion
 


You must be a troll and just a pure r-t-rd with a couple loose screws in your head. How are you saying it is moving in that direction??? You need some new glasses buddy. The object is moving to the side of where the shiny part is, not the opposite way. People like you make my guts hurt.

If you were to be zoomed out the whole video. You would clearly be able to see the object moving horizontally not vertically.

Also if you were to pause the video right at the start when he is zoomed out, Tilt your head and look at it like you are saying. and just think logically for 1 minute. The light part would be at the TOP, with the object going DOWN.

Inverted or not, flipped or not. whatever way you look at it, the object is moving to the direction of where the shiny party is...so no way in hell would that be a Chinese lantern.... Apparently everything now is getting called a Chinese lantern.

[edit on 7-7-2010 by YouCanCallMeKM]


You're supposed to deny ignorance here on ATS, not show it, Youcan!

Do you not comprehend the concept of the video being played in reverse as well as being flipped?

Try a bit harder to take things in and understand what you are reading before you make insulting and incompetent replies!

And no, everything isn't being called a Chinese lantern. Only Chinese lanterns are.


Well it seems that way. Even the most credible, debunkers try to manage to get their grubby little paws on the issue and mold it into something else because its a phenomenon that isn't supposed to happen in their tiny little world. Debunkers can try to play it down and get technical with it with their limited logic, but it will never beat massive witness groups, evidence, and whistle blowers within government agencies.

Everything up to Flying lighthouses, Flying Oil Rigs in the fog. I see a growing number of the early J. Allen Hynek where he went around telling people, UFO's are meteorites, but they also use optical illusions to make it look like they are going right and left. Good thing hes on our side now and not with the bunch of junko's out there today that just can't see that extra terrestrials just might be visiting us.

As for any massive witness sightings. Such as the UFO that flew over Stevenville, TX. If this were to go to a court with all the witnesses, it would have been over before it started. Thats a fact.

[edit on 7-7-2010 by QuantumDeath]



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by PsychoX42
 




The quality of the video is SO BAD that you cannot prove at any point this object passes above or through those clouds. So you cannot say what height it is so you cannot rule out LATERNS or even the SOLAR BALLOON mentioned in another post here.



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR
 



Also its not actually flying straight up its flying sideways up in that scandalous reversed footage, again wot does this tell you...?


It tells you it was being blown by the wind... which is what you'd expect from a balloon, but not a weird metal craft travelling hundreds of miles per hour at 20,000 feet.


IN THE FALSE REVERSED VIDEO

Its going directly up at a 30-45 degree angle is that normal, ?

OR was the camera man standing at a 30-45 degree angle ?

Can you explain why the cloud now look like they would from the international space station?, oh wait i know because you have tampered with the Original footage...


We have also established that a Lantern would not be at that altitude & certainly would not be accelerating at speeds still like this thing at that altitude, it clearly passes through the cloud, are you reading anything in this thread? and simply ignoring facts & logic on purpose to fit your single mindedness?



[edit on 7-7-2010 by BRITWARRIOR]



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by PsychoX42
See BritWarriors post of the types of clouds that are witnessed in the video. Then compare the object which is right next to these clouds. These clouds only exist at certain altitudes which is rather apparent from the video.

That's the problem, why do you say that the object is next to the clouds?


Nonetheless, if you're dead set on disbelieving that this object is nothing different from a plastic bag, as you stated, then no amount of logic will change your mind.

I'm not dead set on anything, I just don't interpret things in the same way as you do.



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by PsychoX42
 




The quality of the video is SO BAD that you cannot prove at any point this object passes above or through those clouds. So you cannot say what height it is so you cannot rule out LATERNS or even the SOLAR BALLOON mentioned in another post here.


Whatever helps you sleep at night. However, I always hear that same excuse. "The video quality is so bad that..." For me, that excuse doesn't wash anymore.

I've seen the scientific community, UFO Hunters, National Geographic, and the History Channel extrapolate pertinent information such as altitude and speed from video that was much worse in quality than this one, and they had known and highly revered professionals in their field doing it.

So, you are welcome to think what you choose, as you were going to do that anyway. But, some of us can see past the veil that consistently keeps so many of you blinded from seeing a much larger and clearer picture than your limited consciousness will allow you to see. The first process in this is accepting that there is phenomena that exists outside of your normal perception. If it weren't for technology, we would never know that the ultra-violet spectrum even exists. Had we never discovered this fact from technological advancements, I'm sure someone would eventually postulate its existence, while all of those around this person would outright call this person a liar and insist that their version of reality was skewed...In fact, you would hear such responses as..."Well, that's preposterous, can you believe that Joseph over here is saying that an ultraviolet light dimension exists outside of human perception? He's obviously been tilting back quite a few and probably needs his head examined. I think Joseph has heard too many ghost stories and the "swamp gas" is getting to his brain. Or maybe, he saw too many Chinese Lanterns and is taking his own theories too seriously."

Well, that seems to be the mentality of those who constantly grip onto old and conventional knowledge as if this "knowledge itself" has the ability to explain every mystery on planet earth and beyond. Like I stated before, since we don't even know what resides on our ocean floor, I think its safe to say that no one has the inside scoop on what is occurring in the cosmos. And quite frankly, the "Chinese Lantern" explanation has run its course. Its about time for a more evolutionized chapter in human history to begin.

Namaste and Love

[edit on 7-7-2010 by PsychoX42]



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by BRITWARRIOR
0:15s tell me wot you see, you see that fading... thats because its either above or going in the cloud, clouds we have established to be Altocumulus

I don't think so, I think it's because of the zooming in, higher zooming levels reduce the amount of light entering the camera, as you can see on the edges of the frame.



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 07:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by PsychoX42
See BritWarriors post of the types of clouds that are witnessed in the video. Then compare the object which is right next to these clouds. These clouds only exist at certain altitudes which is rather apparent from the video.

That's the problem, why do you say that the object is next to the clouds?


Nonetheless, if you're dead set on disbelieving that this object is nothing different from a plastic bag, as you stated, then no amount of logic will change your mind.

I'm not dead set on anything, I just don't interpret things in the same way as you do.


Are you watching the same video that I am? I just have to ask this because you pretend like there are no clouds in the video when that is literally the first thing that you see before they zoom in on the object. Is that what I am led to believe by your answer or response to me? If not, then I apologize, however, it is plain as day in the video itself. Maybe you're intentionally trying to be difficult, however, the clouds are there. And since the clouds are clearly visible, you can ascertain a rough estimate of the size of the object. Anyway, I will await your next response.

Namaste and Love

[edit on 7-7-2010 by PsychoX42]



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 07:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR
 



Also its not actually flying straight up its flying sideways up in that scandalous reversed footage, again wot does this tell you...?


It tells you it was being blown by the wind... which is what you'd expect from a balloon, but not a weird metal craft travelling hundreds of miles per hour at 20,000 feet.


And how did you arrive at this conclusion? Where do you see wind blowing the object? How did you come up with the idea that wind was the propulsion used to make this object move? And since the object is at roughly the same altitude as the clouds, wouldn't the clouds also be moving in that general direction?

There are inherent flaws with your theory, you might want to take a much better look.



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by BRITWARRIOR
 



Also its not actually flying straight up its flying sideways up in that scandalous reversed footage, again wot does this tell you...?


It tells you it was being blown by the wind... which is what you'd expect from a balloon, but not a weird metal craft travelling hundreds of miles per hour at 20,000 feet.


It tells you nothing, as another poster has said already there are no ground based reference points to reference speed at any height. Add to that There is no mention of wind direction, and no mention of direction of travel compared to wind both of which are essential items but ommitted. Without that info you cannot begin to even speculate as to Balloon, Lantern or aircraft. Something upside down in the first few posts is right out there, that doesn't mean it's wrong, but it doesn't make it right either without more information.

[edit on 7-7-2010 by smurfy]



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 07:11 PM
link   
reply to post by PsychoX42
 


I've been on the Earth for a good bit now, and up until I started coming to this website my experience with these lanterns was exactly squat.

It's actually kind of enlightening, being on the opposite side of the fence for once. No wonder some people get so frustrated when they see people calling UFO, I get just as frustrated when I see somebody calling lantern.

In reference to this video though, I really don't care if it's a balloon, a trashcan or a flying object of unexplainable origin - I feel the integrity of debunking it should have some logic behind it, and the stretch of reason behind the whole "flipping & reversing" from out of left field is just too much of a stretch for my imagination. /rant

- Fry



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by SwissPort905v2
"People wont get it, even when UFO's are flying over their head"


Humans,


You are definitely right about that. It will take nothing short of a healthy anal probing while the person is fully conscious to entertain the idea that it wasn't another human that was doing it. This is the reason for our de-evolution and over grown population problem which has dumbed down the general public while empowering those who consistently seek to control us through information, economic means, and political control.

If they can't figure out that the government regularly screws over the American people right in front of our faces without hiding it, then they won't be able to tell a UFO from a Chinese Lantern even if it did backflips in the air, landed in their front yard while abducting their labrador while singing "ET phone home" in their native language.

The movie "Idiocracy" should have been a documentary instead of a work of fiction.

Namaste and Love

[edit on 7-7-2010 by PsychoX42]



posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 07:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by BRITWARRIOR
0:15s tell me wot you see, you see that fading... thats because its either above or going in the cloud, clouds we have established to be Altocumulus

I don't think so, I think it's because of the zooming in, higher zooming levels reduce the amount of light entering the camera, as you can see on the edges of the frame.


You cannot be serious,

Its not Zooming, its already Zoomed in,

Please someone LOOP it


@DJ, This is your LANTERNS from poland
media.abovetopsecret.com...


[edit on 7-7-2010 by BRITWARRIOR]



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join