It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
for me to believe that you are correct in your analysis, i would literally have to deny the experiences my five senses have provided me with and admit to myself my senses are not reliable.
who is right, your or my sensory perceptions, doc?
when someone is being diagnosed with dellusional misperceptions they are analyzed and patients of a panel of doctors with PhDs.
so if no one person can legally be permitted to diagnosis someone of any unsubstantiated mental dissorders, then how can you?
to make the claim people are too quick to assume anything is only a reflection of what you hold up for comparison when judging others, that is what you know of yourself is what you can accept is the reality as what must be plausible for them.
In other words, people are only capable of recognizing the aspects of other peoples intentions when they can recognize it within themselves, otherwise they are just full of
case & point:
Homosexuality, a choice some say.
me? i'm a well versed hederosexual who can not even begin to imagine that even if i had every gun on this planet pointed at my head ... i still couldn't get sexually aroused by another man.
so those who say it is a choice are only correct and not lying if they themselves once looked at a person of the same sex and thought to themselves: "maybe".
otherwise, they are lying, aren't they? how else would they claim to know why?
i'm not quick to assume, and i'm not eager to believe.
even if we totally dismiss 51% of all photos as junk, the odds are still in favor of us being visited by either our futures, our pasts, and/or being of origins as of yet unknown.
earth is only 1/9000 the age of the universe by most accepted accounts.
"we are attempting to communicate through time"
-Morgan Freeman, Wormhole Series
if we are attempting it, we are doing it....
maybe some people do not need the pictures either way.
perhaps science fictions' wildest imaginations don't even quantify the possibilities. maybe truth is the currency of choice between civilizations far older than us.....
I'M STAR TREK CAPT.
can i have your permission to turn theat "M" upside down? do i need your permission to do so?
can i have your permission to re-arrange those letters a different way? do i need your permission to do so?
PATRICK STEWART
but who am i, and what do i know,
ET
may the forces be with you,
ET
Originally posted by black cat
Originally posted by The_Zomar
Originally posted by -Blackout-
I have seen that 3rd picture somewhere before.......
Without the UFO I'm guessing, because I assure you I created it.
I actually got a kick out of the people that didn't read that they were fake and complimented the photos. I got a kick out of it because it further illustrates my point in creating this thread.
What point? That you like to make fun of people? This board on ATS exists for one purpose - to discuss and debate the issue of Extraterrestrials, so when someone posts a photo for analysis here one shouldn't have to wonder whether the OP is playing some stupid game with everyone else. Yes, there are unscrupulous individuals who will fake evidence, but this thread serves no purpose whatsoever other than to poke fun at people. And poking fun at people isn't what ATS is all about.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
They see an orange orb float across the sky no noise the suddenly it shots of at high speed. NO what it was a chinese lantern and the candle goes out.
....
People see what they want not whats there thats the real problem with ufo pics and videos.
Originally posted by black cat
This object:
Originally posted by The_Zomar
Desert Sphere
Is this image too good to be true? Most of the time that statement is true, but with this image we can see what appears to be a reflection on the surface of the water, and what may possibly be a shadow below (Don't quote me on that, it could be a smudge on the film) Some say it is a weather balloon, but I've never seen a metallic weather balloon before. This image was taken in Nevada.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f877d6edd36d.jpg[/atsimg]
Looks exactly the same as the object in this picture and others in the link below:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3d29d8366994.jpg[/atsimg]
www.ufoevidence.org...
Except the picture you posted was taken in Nevada and the one I posted was supposedly from Zdany, Poland.
Edit: I just read the bottom of your post that you say you created these pictures. Threads like this one don't serve any purpose but to mock believers in UFOs and discredit legitimate sightings, despite what you say about being a believer.
Incidentally, you say you "created" these pics. How did you create that one over the "Nevada" desert? Did you actually create it or did you just copy it from another website and claim it as your own work?
As for the last UFO that object is the same as one of the STS "Tether" UFOs or one of the objects seen in orbit around Earth.
[edit on 6-7-2010 by black cat]
[edit on 6-7-2010 by black cat]
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
for me to believe that you are correct in your analysis, i would literally have to deny the experiences my five senses have provided me with and admit to myself my senses are not reliable.
who is right, your or my sensory perceptions, doc?
Originally posted by notsoperfect
What saddens me with this thread is when you think of what's the point of this nonsense.
Do you want people to believe the UFO phenomenon is all real or all fake?
You don't need a hundered UFO stories or photos to believe in the UFO.
The fundamental point is if there is any outer space beings visiting earth or not at all, which is a very serious existential question.
I think this post is an IDIOTIC distraction.