posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 06:40 AM
I still believe 9/11 was an inside job and I think by using the 93 bombing as any kind of evidence that it was not is really very backwards. You seem,
and forgive me if I am wrong in my assumption, to be fairly new to the 1993 bombing. If this is the case, I would suggest you look into a man named
Emad Salem was an FBI informant who supplied the bomb making materials as well as the plan to bomb the WTC to the people who carried it out. Salem
got those materials and the funding from the FBI.
Now I realize extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof and Emad Salem provided that proof in hours upon hours worth of tape recorded
conversations with his FBI Handlers and those tapes tell a story that not only did the FBI know it was being planned, provided the materials for the
bomb, lied to their own informant by supplying real explosives instead of fake as the informant was promised and funded a large part of the
operation.... but they also knew the date and time that the bombing would take place and choose to allow it to happen.
So I am sorry to tell you but the 1993 bombing of the WTC actually helps make the case by showing how 9/11 cold very well indeed be an inside job in
edit on 25-7-2011 by MrWendal because: (no reason given)