It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Whateva69
I'm going to read more about the first picture, but I'm having trouble reading that print on the link..its killing my eyes. It could be a badly burnt grey
Originally posted by Silver Star
reply to post by tappy
I have to admit that the goon looks inflated, like a balloon or something, but i find Mr Stapletons account to be convincing.
The video is so wrong it's hard to know just where to start. First there is no ridge. to claim there is is absolute bunkem . it was taken on a Marsh land. Marsh lands are , by definition, flat, or they aren't Marsh lands. The horizon is about 100 yards maybe even further than that. Go to 1.34 in this video and that is actually the place the picture was taken. See how far the horizon actually is and how totally and utterly flat the area is.
The figure is apparent on only one frame between other pictures of the young girl in the same pose in the same position. Kodak themselves have pronounced that, as far as they can tell, the picture is genuine., That is, there are no signs of tampering with the photo during the printing process.
Given that, the conclusion is that, either the figure is floating in mid air, or is some ridiculous height around 20 ft tall.
Originally posted by drift393
The first one reminds me of some of the weird roots from the fleece flower plant. link to human looking roots
The second pic has always been of interest and intriguing.
edit for posting image link in wrong spot.
[edit on 6-7-2010 by drift393]