posted on Jul, 7 2010 @ 06:43 AM
The question seems to me to be less about who this John Podesta is, and more about who it was who persuaded him that his original standpoint was
somehow invalid .
In my view, the destabilisation of the worlds governance can only result in favourable conditions in the long run, for freedom, and total seperation
of government and population, a goal I think ought to be striven for by everyone.
This is because the current methods, of the few leading the many , are flawed in a most drastic fashion. We live in a world where the people on the
street know more about the problems , and thier solutions , than the suited ignorant savages in parliments around the world. This is unsustainable .
If we learn about UFO and extra terrestrial matters, yes it may destabilise the world, but it will likely as not force factions who oppose one
another, to consolidate and combine in order to preserve thier strength, bringing people, attitudes and cultures together , for the benifit of the
And, to be honest, do we really think that the future of the human race is worth any damn thing at all , if we cannot accept the truth to the point
where hearing it will destroy us ? I believe that if we cannot handle the truth, we should hear it and burn as punishment for our absolutely
disgraceful lack of open mindedness and adaptability !