Well, the NWO is surely a debated topic. I think there are a NWO. But I don't think there are one. Confused, well...
I usually rule out the concept that people are controlled by only one group. This group could be a form of the Illuminati, which, in essence, controls
the world not to "take it over", but to improve it, making it better.
But why all the conflicts? Why all these troops and the war on terror?
Some say it's all in one. I say that there are people who disagree with each other. Even in Nazi Germany, where the Germans believed that only Hitler
had full control, didn't have full control. As some of you may recall, Heinrich Himmler started to make his own agendas and had his fingers in pies
Hitler would never consider, like for example, the "peace offer" with the allies (trading a group of Jews for his escape or something like that).
So, if this little superpower couldn't get it right, how could the supposed cruel rulers of the world get everything right, supposedly agree on
everything, and at the same time, ensuring not a bit of information or any kind of material suggesting "its" existance, to be released?
And not only Nazi Germany. The Soviet Union too. And probably many other fascist nations, past and present.
On the other hand, what does exist is the fact that people in groups, or induviduals by themselves, do strive for power. Money are being traded behind
the back of the general public. People do these kind of stuff. We have always done it, in one way or another.
And even if the NWO would mean a small group with very powerful men and women, how would they control us? With troops? Troops that are human? Soldiers
can think too. Just because you're a soldier doesn't mean that you follow orders blindly, killing family, friends, and even your own nation and
The virus option? Releasing a virus, and only giving people who follow you the cure? It's the only possibility I see as "reasonable", but as I have
said before, that kind of technology is far away. I'd say: "try again in 2050".
No NWO then? Globalisation, killing of animal species. Fear and all kinds of trash they show us on TV. Same old movies, music and harch laws. Racism
and white power. Disinformation. Pollution. "Black Budgets/Black Money". That is what I call the NWO.
But on whose behalf? Many. Some people want power through money, others want it through "identity" structures, like racist groups. Others prefer war
or extremism. It's like an invisible war, but at the same time, visible. It's a mixture of everything. But I don't believe that on the top there's
a one mighty organization that controls them all.
And if there would be a "small group NWO wanabe", then why is Microsoft billionaire Mr. Gates giving away millions of money to welfare and the poor?
Why is the UN helping countries through smaller organizations such as the UNICEF - while they have almost never been fighting any wars with UN troops
(and in a fearful way)? Some militia-US groups complain that the UN is going to take it all over. What they don't seem to realize is that the UN
isn't composed of it's own people, it's composed of US marines, Chinese marines, Swedish troops and so on.
Where is the UN central government? Many people say that the UN is too much liberal to function properly, and some even argue that it would be far
more efficent to make it a kind of global government.
As you see, I could go on and on. But I have decided that people can debate against me, and, I will try to do my best.... duh...
world wildlife fund
What's so evil about them? Control the animals, control the world?
It's strange that many people critisize FEMA, yet, they don't seem to know what purpose this organization serve, or how they possibly would control
the world. I've read articles of volunteers who worked with FEMA, and they say that it is almost a big joke FEMA being an "evil conspiracy to
enslave everyone". Do they even know what a firearm is?
the federal reserve
Yes, this is the only "group" I agree are not so "good". But it seems to be more about money that controlling people.