It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Unconscious UFO remarks from both President Obama and BP CEO Tony Hayward portray the largest oil spill in the history of the United States as an environmental battleground in a global state-sponsored “Operation Northwoods” – type terror war. According to a recent study released on YouTube by a private Vancouver-based audio lab, secret mirror-encrypted messages suggest that Hayward is aware of plans to use the Gulf oil spill disaster in a bid to access US-held UFO clean energy technology secrets. Messages from President Obama also described a “saucer” and provide “black wars” details.
Viewed through the lens of a mirror filter, the audio signal from Tony Hayward’s spoken comments revealed the words, “Give us a saucer in the, in the black wars.”
Mirror processing of the President’s audio signal revealed an encrypted message describing “A saucer”
Successfully identified the BTK Killer on Wichita morning radio 15 minutes before he confessed.
Reliably disclosed Oprah's true feelings about James Frey on Atlanta morning radio 2 weeks before she called him out as a liar on daytime television.
Accurately reported the "Shock and Awe" strikes that opened the Iraq War 2 years in advance.
All those in charge of the cover up would have to do is tarnish ever so lightly someone's verifiable credentials and their testimony is discarded. If that kind of vetting is what you want, then you'll be focused on lights in the skies since that is an empirical phenomenon which is objectively verifiable, as opposed to the testimonies of whistleblowers that is subjective. Your logic would eliminate the richest data set in terms of telling us about extraterrestrial life and technologies, and all we'd have is lights in skies confirmed by multiple independent witnesses, with supporting radar tracking, confirmed photos/videos, etc., as the scientific ufologists want. If so, then play safe and go for a more restrictive UFOlogical approach, but I find that rather boring and prefer the risks and opportunies of whistleblower testimonies. Sure, one's reputation can get tarnished in the process, but I'm here to find the truth about a phenomenon that is multilayered, not prove things to skeptics.
Originally posted by True-seer
reply to post by XxRagingxPandaxX
I stated it would be my last prediction thread and can we keep this thread on-topic please.
Farewell ATS you have been like a family to me over these few short weeks.