Galaxies linked by quasar-making nebula

Galaxies linked by quasar-making nebula six times bigger than the Milky Way

Villar-Martin says this provides strong support for the idea that the accretion discs that form quasars are indeed the debris from these galactic interactions, with the nebula a key link in the exchange of cosmic material. Indeed, the nebula is itself most likely composed of the detritus of these interactions.

Source


Here's a visual approximation of the vast nebula of ionized gas connected to galaxy SDSS J0123+00 and its quasar



IIRC, isn't this basically what EU/Plasma Cosmology has been saying this whole time? Quasars have something to do with galaxies and are connected to galaxies by bridges of matter. Yet this whole time mainstream cosmologists just wrote this off as "chance alignments". Pretty cool that they finally came to their senses!


[edit on 4-7-2010 by sirnex]

Yes, but no one will listen unfortunately. PC and EU is considered fringe science in the mainstream world

reply to post by Maddogkull


They kind of have to sorta start listening now that it's been confirmed that quasars are indeed connected to galaxies by bridges of matter.

Yes, but they would find a way to make it work with the modern cosmology model. There are so many problems with the modern cosmological models, there has to be a revision. We need some new kind of physics.

reply to post by Maddogkull


We don't necessarily need new physics. The only problem is that the math in the current model is inaccurate and doesn't describe reality properly. They need to change the calculations in accordance with observations rather than inventing new mathematical entities to make those observations fit the inaccurate math.

reply to post by sirnex


What people don't realise is general relativity is still considered theoretical physics. People accept it as fact. It is not. The reason EU and PC does not fit into this model is because it goes against everything Einstein said. This is sad. I have yet to see anything that truly debunks PC and EU models.

[edit on 4-7-2010 by Maddogkull]

reply to post by Maddogkull


Well, it's pretty much extremely difficult to debunk it as it's based off plasma physics which is well established. With space being 99% plasma, it only makes perfect logical sense that plasma cosmology would be correct. Einsteins model does nothing more than give us a way to invent all sorts of unrealistic things that sound really really cool if they were real.

This should be getting disscussed more. Im surprised no one has responded.

reply to post by Maddogkull


In regards to the topic of Quasars being ejected from Active Galactic Nuclei, through a plasma controlled process, I would think the article in the OP demonstrates further proof that this is the case.

I'm a little burnt out on this stuff...

I just finished reading this article in which mainstream scientists continue to show obvious bias towards what the status-quo believes it 'knows', right down to the design of the instrumentation itself. Plasma is continuously misnamed, it is being called cold or hot gas and dust instead. They fail to also mention the ionized nature of the matter and the electromagnetic fields inherent in these process.

In the image of the cmb is more evidence of electromagnetic phenomena.

reply to post by Ionized


What I find amazing is that we're passing through an ionized plasma that caught mainstream cosmologists by surprise. Voyager showed this nebulous cloud to have a stronger than it should magnetic field, technically without that field this cloud wouldn't exist. They're too quick to dismiss the role plasma physics has in space and so they get taken aback by all these so called "surprises".

reply to post by sirnex


The mainstream seem to reject anything that ties with the Electric Universe.
It plays havoc with their stone-age theories.

“If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6 and 9, then you'd have the key to the universe" -Nikola Tesla


The Americanist

You'll find information inside those blogs (view all).

As additional reference (youtube or google search terms):

Dale Pond - Keely, SVP
Marko Rodin - (look for a 44pt Lecture Series) Vortex Math Model
Nassim Haramein - Vector Based Geometry