It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by minute2midnight
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
Yes it is a reflection. Here is a pic of the dash of Jeep Patriot.
Notice the speaker. Notice the windshield. Now, replace that with a led lit speaker, which I've already posted. Go do some more research.
Originally posted by FireMoon
It's not a reflection or the raindrops would not be in front of it. If you actually bother to take it into a viewer and blow it up, that much is patently obvious. That doesn't mean it isn't a fake. Just remind me never to ride in one of your rockets..
Originally posted by Phage
I was just getting ready to leave in my car but I wanted to take a picture of a palm tree. Then I saw the UFO. It had to be in the clouds because the raindrops are in front of it.
[edit on 7/4/2010 by Phage]
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
reply to post by bluemooone2
Ok, the image online - thanks for the link - is not the original since it's at 72 ppi but it will still work to explain my reasoning.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/561d7d03e6ab.jpg[/atsimg]
Everything outside of the car has motion blur. The object has no motion blur. It wasn't moving relative to the car. It was stationary within the car. The rain drop visible on the object is not as defined as the raindrops without a reflection affecting them.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/cd76b2da052a.jpg[/atsimg]
The reflection and the scenery outside the car are blended, not one or the other as some suppose but a combination of both views.
Edit: fixed the links.
[edit on 4/7/2010 by SeenMyShare]
Originally posted by Phage
I was just getting ready to leave in my car but I wanted to take a picture of a palm tree. Then I saw the UFO. It had to be in the clouds because the raindrops are in front of it.
[edit on 7/4/2010 by Phage]
Originally posted by FireMoon:
It's not a reflection or the raindrops would not be in front of it.
Originally posted by SeenMyShare
reply to post by bluemooone2
Ok, the image online - thanks for the link - is not the original since it's at 72 ppi but it will still work to explain my reasoning.
Everything outside of the car has motion blur. The object has no motion blur. It wasn't moving relative to the car. It was stationary within the car. The rain drop visible on the object is not as defined as the raindrops without a reflection affecting them.
The reflection and the scenery outside the car are blended, not one or the other as some suppose but a combination of both views.
Edit: fixed the links.
[edit on 4/7/2010 by SeenMyShare]