It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by Acecool79
Why do you need infastructure? I don't think the nazis cared that much, and as far as Abu graib goes, it doesn't seem as if the US cares that much either.
Abu graib had toilets, it had lights and running water. There were medical facilities available if needed.
Even the Germans had structures for the disposal of the bodies (ovens).
Without basic sanitation, shelter and health care, you risk starting a disease epidemic that would easily and quickly spread to the general population.
Originally posted by claritynow
Very interesting thread.
For those who landed on this forum looking for information on FEMA camps, please check out the article link provided below.
The majority of the information on the subject floating around is produced by fear mongers and tin foil mad hatters. Take a moment to read a more measured and researched approach to this subject. This article argues that there is little substance to claims of FEMA concentration camps:
(just providing another perspective, k?)
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
Originally posted by cleaner_hw
The new world order will be one money(currency),one religion,one government ,and one military (the United Nations).
Perhaps someone can tell me what is wrong with this picture, where there is NO United States Constitution or Bill Of Rights.
I don't really see the problem.
If there is no Bill of Rights and no Constitution then they cannot be abrogated. You can't break what doesn't exist.
Anyway, we have no Bill of Rights and I would suggest our government is less opressive of us than the US is of its people.
And how often has the US government broken Constitutional law anyway? Look at the secret bombing campaign of Cambodia. The wiretapping of White House employees. The decision to categorise prisoners as "illegal enemy combatants" and thus make it legal not to observe the Geneva convention.
Who needs such "quaint" and "outdated" documents?