It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Copernicus
We have 7 billion people on the planet and the problem is not space or food. Its that the rich 20% of the planet use 80% of the resources.
Looking at this objectively, we have 20% of the population who needs to die. Then we have +80% of resources for the others.
So do we start with killing off America or Great Britain or Germany? I cant decide.
Originally posted by g146541
I am not sure if this is the place for this subject so if any mods see fit to move it I understand.
The world is overcrowded and we need to reduce the population any way we can.
You hear of the elite spouting lies that suggest that the world is over crowded and we need to cull the populace, I suggest they may be spot on with their calculations.
Taking say one continent, I’ll use Australia. Probably because I have aussie buds online and if I had to pick a secondary place to live they say it is beautiful country.
Now the world population is 6,800,000,000 people approximately (source is Wikipedia)
If you argue this you are silly and won’t read this seriously anyway.
Now we use Australia there is 2,967,892 square miles (Source Wikipedia also)
Same thing if you argue you are silly.
Now 1 square mile is 640 acres (Same source plus common sense)
I will stop stating sources as all of this information is common knowledge or quite easy to verify, and that is all that is important to me, as I am not the intellectual type.
I use the K.I.S.S. method Keep It Simple Stupid.
Now that we have a bunch of big numbers let’s do the crunch.
Australia is roughly 2,967,892 square miles and 1 square mile has 640 acres so
2,967,892 square miles x 640 = 1,899,450,880 acres in Australia.
Now we take 1,899,450,880 and divide by the population of the earth which is 6,800,000,000.
1,899,450,880 divided by 6,800,000,000. Is 3.57 persons per acre.
Let’s just call it 4 people per acre to make it a round number as I am not a fan of half people, it just seems barbaric.
So the world’s population could fit inside Australia with 4 people per acre.
I think that is a quarter acre per person in the world man woman child elderly Etc.
So is my math correct? Can you see now that the world is overpopulated?
If we put the world population in Australia.
Otherwise I think we are doing just fine.
Originally posted by g146541
The world population must be reduced at all costs
The world is overcrowded and we need to reduce the population any way we can.
Originally posted by g146541
reply to post by Amagnon
You said non sequitur, I don’t care if a person does not sweat.
Remember you got to speak in lay terms as people like me must spend an overwhelming amount of time on the Merriam Webster site to find out what things mean.
Either way you look at it and I think cars are kind of a crazy analogy to use for humans.
We have the resources we need to feed and cloth the world, we could even do it with twice the populace, just some people are better than others and think they deserve more.
And itn is arguably true that without war we would not have famine or disease, due to people doing "good mans work" building, farming, teaching and studying Etc. rather than just killing for an elite dictator.
[edit on 3-7-2010 by g146541]
Originally posted by g146541
reply to post by RestingInPieces
The starving people starve because of logistic problems and bad men with guns and a bit of greedy corporations.