reply to post by Equinox99
I get what you'e saying, Equinox
, very, very clearly.
I simply don't repeat the full extent of my opinions, in every post, regarding the complexities of the intelligence failures and disasters that left
the U.S. vulnerable, in September 2001 (and, BTW, for many months afterwards).
The focus of this thread, I believe, is merely to show that the majority
of the so-called "truther" claims are nonsense. These are merely
the after-the-fact rampant speculations --- I don't think I have to enumerate them all, but a few most outrageous examples are:
- 'DEW' or space-based orbiting weapons platforms
- Controlled demoliton (pre-planted somehow, magically)
- and one of the worst ever, foisted right here on this Board, by
a long-time and very unimpressive
, yet prolilfic ATS poster?
"Did The USAF Help With 9/11?
THAT one, to me, was most egregious, and disgusting.
But, those, and the similar ones, are all a symptom of the problem, as I keep stating.
The "true" 'cover-up', most likely, will be the attempts to hide the Intelligence Agencys' varied failures, in the run-up to September 11th.
THAT, the ineptitude and inability to work together, in an inter-agency manner (ego, career greed, etc) led directly to the holes being there, to be
exploited by the terrorists.
ALL the rest of this? Internet self-licking, and grandiose posturing....spurred partly by the implied anonymity of the Web...
(Of course, thre are a FEW vocal and 'public' sorts, but very few, and very loosely aligned. SOME are downright crazy....Nico Hauptman [sp?], in
AS TO the much vaunted rosters of "Patriots For...", "Pilots For...", "A&E For..." etc? (BTW, there is a lot of cross-pollinization of
membership, in many of those...)
We need to seriously evaluate WHAT any participants with those groups actually signed on for....I'm willing to wager that MOST of them wish to seek
the truth of the Intelligence blunders, and THOSE cover-ups, and hold any responsible accountable to those actions.
NOT (in the majority of cases) is there a strong "belief" in all the other nonsense, and most ridiculous and convoluted "false flag" claims that
infest this subject.
MOST of those seem to have been the result of over-active imaginations, and a culture of decades of Hollywood, and other venues, of the spy-thriller