It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Has 9/11 truth had its day ?

page: 11
5
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 12:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Carseller4
I thought "Popular Mechanics" did a great job shutting this nonsense down.

Every outrageous claim has been thoroughly debunked.

Pretty much a bygone fad nowadays.


The problem is that so many Americans are so stupid that they can't comprehend the fact that they are idiots.

Consider the OBVIOUS absurdities of 9/11.

Notice the elongated holes in WTC1 & 2 caused by the wings of the airliners.

If an airliner hit the Pentagon why wasn't there a similarly shaped hole?

When airliners hit WTC1 & 2 the impacts were detected miles away on a seismograph even though the planes hit hundreds of feet up the buildings.

So how does an airliner hit the Pentagon at nearly ground level and we have never heard about a seismographic detection?

And then there is the phenomenal coincidence of the hijackers taking the planes on the same day that the military just happened to be doing 4 air defense exercises? Or was it six? Have theyever done so many exercises on one day before? How did the hijackers know? Nah, it was just coincidence!

Americans have spent almost NINE YEARS turning 9/11 into the most idiotic event in

PSYCHO-history.

Isaac Asimov must love it. 9/11 was science FICTION.

It is the Piltdown Man incident of the 21st century.

Why should we listen to physicists talk about Black Holes and the Big Bang and String Theory if they can't get this settled to 3 decimal places? And they can't even get started on this if they don't insist on having accurate information on the tons of steel and tons of concrete on every level of the towers.

psik




posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by psikeyhackr
The problem is that so many Americans are so stupid that they can't comprehend the fact that they are idiots.


Assuming you're not American then...




Notice the elongated holes in WTC1 & 2 caused by the wings of the airliners.
If an airliner hit the Pentagon why wasn't there a similarly shaped hole?


LOL!

Are you serious? Surely not!

If so, you are comparing apples to elephants, and have proven that it's not just Americans who:


are so stupid that they can't comprehend the fact that they are idiots.








posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:15 PM
link   
reply to post by psikeyhackr
 



Why should we listen to physicists talk about Black Holes and the Big Bang and String Theory if they can't get this settled to 3 decimal places?


Actually, this is all well settled. Everyone is satisfied as to the nuts and bolts of the events of that day. There really are no open issues except some issues regarding the effectiveness of our intelligence and security communities. That is all, and those issues will be ironed out over time.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 05:50 PM
link   
"Notice the elongated holes in WTC1 & 2 caused by the wings of the airliners.
If an airliner hit the Pentagon why wasn't there a similarly shaped hole?"

Haven't you heard? The wings retracted backwards upon impact like they do in those toy planes.


And depending on which idiot you ask, those two massive engines situated on the wings either vaporized or somehow managed to deflect into the building

Now there are some answers Americans can wrap brains around. See, when you watch too many cartoons, TV shows and movies, you can be made to believe any nonsense.



posted on Jul, 27 2010 @ 09:03 PM
link   
reply to post by SphinxMontreal
 


Sphinx, you see...right there, that attitude in your post?

Sorry, but that perfectly illustrates WHY the OP's question is valid....the "truth movement" is infested with so much misinformation, as evidenced by your comments. So much misinformation, and misunderstandings, that they go nowhere...just spin their wheels, looking foolish.

I think most people (like you) are sincere...but so horribly misguided (and naiively so) by the garbage from the "9/11 conspiracy" sites that they fail to accept, anymore, logic and reason, and factual explanations....they have become so invested in this fantasy, and "evil plot"....it's like a religion to them.

Mentioning "wings folding back" at the Pentagon, for instance. See...THAT particular false meme was started by a "truther"!!! It was written as an attempt to ridicule, and it has been adopted, and by now ---- many "truthers" hear it, and think it's what is being claimed by the facts....it ISN'T! Came from the "truthers", and only they keep repeating it. (The marks the wings left on the facade of the Pentagon are visible, in many photos...these photos are NEVER included in the "9/11 conspiracy" websites and blogs).


Another thing, since you brought up the Pentagon, and AAL 77 (and it falls into the broad category of all 9/11 "truthers" claims...

...the "massive engines". THAT is yet another misconception, and it is promoted by people who simply know NOTHING about aviation, airplanes, jets, and jet turbine engines!!

When you look at an airplane and see the "engine", what you reall see is the cowling (also called the nacelle). It encases the "guts" of the engine, but it is mostly empty space! The engines are constructed out of thousands of separate components, even most of the most recognizable parts, like compressor and turbine rotors are NOT all one piece. the central hubs are solid, but most of them are built with individual blades that are inserted into that hub....some of these blades the size of your hand, some as small as your thumb...(If you had the chance to walk on the ramp, near a jet engine, and a good wind were blowing, the engines will "windmill", and you can hear the individual turbine blakes "tinkling" in their hubs, because some of them are designed intentionally to be a little loose...they adapt to the airflow, inside the engines....)

Here....I will post a cut-away drawing of a typical Rolls Royce jet turbine engine....PLEASE study it closely. This is not meant to match exactly the same engine type on AAL 77, but it IS very similar and common to all modern jet engine designs:




With the types of impact forces involved in such high-speed crashes as seen on 9/11, the engines shed a lot of their parts, in the failure sequence.

I'd like to point out the BIG fan blades...the first ones there, that is the main power/thrust producer of modern jet engines.

EACH of those blades is removable. AND, they are made of aluminum. (An alloy, of course...but basically aluminium).

How do I know this? From a lifetime of experience, and knowledge.

When you have tthe opportunity to get "up close and personal" to a jet, you can look into the engine cowling intake, and see those blades up close...over the service life of an engine, they will inevitably get damaged, by ingestion of small debris. If they get "nicked" slightly, if it's minor, they can be "dressed" out, with a metal file. ALSO, once an engine has been in service for some time, and through a few maintenance procedures, the mechanics have, at one point in time, WRITTEN on them with magic markers --- numbering them. THIS WAY they can identify each blade, in records, and even REPLACE one blade, if necessary, then return the entire unit to service...and all of this requires meticulous record-keeping.

There is so, so much more involved --- I merely scratched the surface here. BUT, as usual, the lay public are totally ignorant of these sorts of details, (and this is only the aviation aspects...) and have no comprehension. THUS, the incredibly ignorant "9/11 conspiracy theory" wagon train keeps rolling along....sad, really.














edit on 11-18-2014 by Springer because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 28 2010 @ 05:25 AM
link   
Hi weedy

I sense a condescending attitude to your post above...so I find it rather rich that you should be the one pointing fingers at attitudes and tones...

Anyway...

One....Could you show me the photos you mentioned above which clearly show the impact marks left by the engines???

Two...Also, how is that in most plane crash sites the engines remain mainly intact, including the cowling, even though they consist, as you say, mainly of air???

Thanks.



posted on Jul, 28 2010 @ 08:34 PM
link   
It should be clear: 9/11 "Truth" is dead and gone. None of the claims 9/11 "Truthers" have made have stood up to easy scrutiny, the evidence, or logic.

We've said it all along.

Nothing or no one has refuted the massive overwhelming evidence that Arab hijackers were responsible for the attacks on 9/11.

There is no other evidence. 9/11 was not an inside job. Bush and his administration were never involved nor had any forehand knowledge of the specific attacks.

No one is "covering up" the actual attacks. Government officials are covering their asses for being incompetent and not paying attention to their jobs before 9/11. They know had they done so and paid attention to the clues that such attacks were indeed possible that they may have been able to help prevent the attacks of 9/11. They forever have to live with the knowledge that their inaction led to the possibly preventable deaths of thousands of innocent people.

But there was never an "inside job." And 9/11 "Truthers" HAVE to confront the reality that they have been wrong to think so.

There will be no new investigations. "Truthers" have never been able to sell it. When the hammer hits the nail, there is absolutely no evidence that anything "Truthers" have claimed happened for the last 9 years actually happened. No evidence has ever surfaced to support "Truther" claims.

None. Zero, Nada.

Everyone, including "Truthers", know that. The subject matter was over years ago. It's over, done, fini.

It's time for "Truthers" to move on and deal with reality and the real world.



posted on Jul, 28 2010 @ 09:07 PM
link   
Wow...talk about trying to emphasize a point!!

Dead and gone...nothing...no...none...never...wrong...no...never...no...no...none...zero...nada...over...done...fini...


The question was "Has 9/11 truth had its day???

Are you trying to say "yes"..???

If only you were right...not wrong, eh!!??

For someone who thinks it has had its day, you and all your other little friends sure like discussing it!!



posted on Jul, 28 2010 @ 10:16 PM
link   
reply to post by jthomas
 



It should be clear: 9/11 "Truth" is dead and gone. None of the claims 9/11 "Truthers" have made have stood up to easy scrutiny, the evidence, or logic.


Science has stood up against all the scrutiny and the evidence and has proven the OS fairytale a fraud.


We've said it all along.


Who is We've?


Nothing or no one has refuted the massive overwhelming evidence that Arab hijackers were responsible for the attacks on 9/11.


What massive overwhelming evidence? Do you care to show this “massive overwhelming evidence”?



There is no other evidence. 9/11 was not an inside job


That is your opinion and it is not true.


Bush and his administration were never involved nor had any forehand knowledge of the specific attacks.


I disagree with you, and your comment is untrue. Do you care to prove your opinion here?


No one is "covering up" the actual attacks. Government officials are covering their asses for being incompetent and not paying attention to their jobs before 9/11.


No, they are just lying like the 911 commission admitting publicly that they deceived the American people. Like NIST proven a fraud by true science.

The stonewalling of the Bush administration to the 911 commission investigations.


WHITEHOUSE STONEWALLING ON 911


www.rumormillnews.com...


Now the 9/11 Commission has made some real news and it’s not good. In its first Interim Report, Kean and Hamilton warned that the commission is not getting the cooperation it needs from the executive branch (surprise, surprise). The report was especially critical of John Ashcroft’s Justice Department (surprise, surprise) and the Pentagon.

And what do you know, The Foreign Affairs Committee of the House of Commons has already issued a report on “The Decision to go to War in Iraq.” It was that document that led the White House to finally admit that claims the President made in his State of the Union address about Iraq trying to buy uranium from Niger were false.


www.cbsnews.com...


Bush Stonewalled 9/11 Commission from the Beginning

In a devastating New York Times op-ed today, 9/11 Commission leaders Tom Keane and Lee Hamilton accused the CIA of stonewalling their panel. The chairman and co-chairman alleged that those in the Bush administration who knew about videotapes of CIA detainee interrogations but failed to inform the 9/11 panel "obstructed our investigation." But lost in their historical record is one other inconvenient truth: President Bush tried to stonewall the 9/11 Commission from the very beginning.

www.perrspectives.com...


They know had they done so and paid attention to the clues that such attacks were indeed possible that they may have been able to help prevent the attacks of 9/11. They forever have to live with the knowledge that their inaction led to the possibly preventable deaths of thousands of innocent people.


We are not talking about some opinions you have of why they did or did not do. We are talking about a false flag operation with a hand full of insiders in the Bush administration helping to carry it out. Oh and don’t feed us that phony story, it must have took thousands of people in our military and government to pull off 911.
Because according to you and our government in supporting the OS, you all are saying only 19 people pulled off 911. So if that is possible, so is pulling off a false flag using experts in their own field to carry out a false flag operation.
Do you really believe that our government is not capable of doing a false flag operation? Governments around the world do it all the time to wage illegal wars of aggression and profits.

But there was never an "inside job." And 9/11 "Truthers" HAVE to confront the reality that they have been wrong to think so.

Again that is your opinion. “Truthers” have come to the reality that the OS is a proven fraud, unscientific, and impossible.
It is the OS believers and the debunkers who need to confront the reality that they have been proven wrong repeatedly, and in believing in a fairytale.

There will be no new investigations.


You do not know what the future holds, so stop making predictions of the future we have enough Sylvia Browns and Ms Cleo making false predictions in here.


"Truthers" have never been able to sell it.


Truthers are not interested in selling anything, but only in supporting the evidence and the science that proves the OS is a fraud.


"Truthers" have claimed happened for the last 9 years actually happened. No evidence has ever surfaced to support "Truther" claims.

None. Zero, Nada.


Sure, there is no evidence to those that continue to hand wave it, and ignore it, because it does not fit their patriotic beliefs. Some people just do not want to hear, or see the truth as well demonstrated in this thread.


Everyone, including "Truthers", know that. The subject matter was over years ago. It's over, done, fini.


Your statement is false, and it will never be over with, not until we have all of the truth.


It's time for "Truthers" to move on and deal with reality and the real world.


I would not be too quick to be giving advice, since it is “you” that supports the OS fairytale. Most people have moved on from the OS, now they are trying to uncover the truth.

[edit on 29-7-2010 by impressme]



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 12:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by impressme
Science has stood up against all the scrutiny and the evidence and has proven the OS fairytale a fraud.


CL, let's apply this statement to truthers shall we?

Science has stood up against all the scrutiny and the evidence and has proven the Truther fairytale of...

Na-nu Thermite
Thermate
Any other Them*te they come up with next
Conventional explosives
Holograms
Pentagon magic trick flyover
Nukes
Space beams
Missiles
TV Fakery (LOL)
Pods
Remote control planes
The Jews did it!
Aliens


...a fraud.





Like NIST proven a fraud by true science.


I think you made a typo there, you meant to say "truther science".

Otherwise, it sure sounds a lot like religious fanaticism. It's like saying the Christian bible is the word of the "true God".




Oh and don’t feed us that phony story, it must have took thousands of people in our military and government to pull off 911.
Because according to you and our government in supporting the OS, you all are saying only 19 people pulled off 911. So if that is possible, so is pulling off a false flag using experts in their own field to carry out a false flag operation.


So how many people did it take? I guess most of that depends on which "truth" you subscribe to, but let's see some truther numbers on the number of people it could have been. I wonder why none of those people have come forward, or let something slip?


Again that is your opinion. “Truthers” have come to the reality that the OS is a proven fraud, unscientific, and impossible.


Ahh, but "truther" reality is so far removed from what is actually scientific and possible.


Truthers are not interested in selling anything


Except for DVD's.. and T-shirts.. and books.. and stickers.. and banners.. and CD's.. and letters.. and cards.. and brochures.. and analyses ...

And you can get all those here - www.ae911truth.net...

Let's see, if you were to buy just one of each of the 23 products they have, you would spend $833! Hmm...seems like they are interested in selling things alright!



it will never be over with, not until we have all of the truth.


It's been over for several years, but hey, I guess you still have the internet to spread the word!



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 01:19 PM
link   
It will never have had its day. We have to keep pushing! It has continued to grow more and more as people research it. This is the key word being RESEARCH. If you don't research you never will know exactly what happened that day. As a person who had no idea what happened that day (until 2009) other than the official story I can say without a doubt that research is the key. All the info is out there if you look.It is not a conspiracy theory.Numerous documentries exist that break it down thouroughly. And when I say break it down I mean over 100 facts that were brodcast at the time on all types of media TV, Newspapers, Internet news articles (from credible sources) not from some blog or opinion article. These documentries compile all this information and when it is laid out in front of you you get the full picture. Who, why, and how. I will list the documetries for you as they are numerous.

Loose Change
Fabled Enemies
Terrorstorm
The 9/11 Chronicles
9/11 The Road to Tyranny
9/11 The great Illusion by George Humphrey 1&2

Also, you may want to check out

Invisivbile Empire
Obama deception
Fall of the Republic
Endgame

All these videos are put out for free on youtube the majority from Alex Jones and Jason Bermas. It is not about profit it is about awareness.



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 01:30 PM
link   
reply to post by bjf1008
 



This is the key word being RESEARCH. If you don't research you never will know exactly what happened that day.


However, you also have to remember that research also has to have a product, at some point you have to say, OK this is done, this is the answer.



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 02:33 PM
link   
reply to post by bjf1008
 


I suggest, in your "research", you take some time to view some valid sources, not stuff like the ones you listed...because most people, even when watching or reading most of that dreck, can apply critical thinking skills, and ask questions (well, not directly of course).

Most of us see the charlatans who make these unsupported claims as the fools they really are...because we can critically evaluate their claims. NOT blindy accept them, nodding like a bobble-head.

Especially, this one:


I will list the documetries for you as they are numerous.

Loose Change



Huh? "Loose Change"? Which version??

The first one, with all the errors?

Or, the second one, where they edited out the obvious errors that were pointed out....but still get it wrong??

Or...(have they made a third or fourth iteration yet???)



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 07:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Soloist
 




I think you made a typo there, you meant to say "truther science".

Otherwise, it sure sounds a lot like religious fanaticism. It's like saying the Christian bible is the word of the "true God".

Science has stood up against all the scrutiny and the evidence and has proven the OS fairytale a fraud.

CL, let's apply this statement to truthers shall we?


Ok then let’s apply your statement to OS believers shall we?

19 invisible hijackers using stolen identities hijacked four invisible commercial aircraft from two major airports without a hitch. (Planes were never identified according to FBI.)

Hijackers who could not be properly identified and to what country they came from because they left no paper trails this statement comes from the head of the FBI, Robert Muller.


[F.B.I. Counsel: No Attempt Made By F.B.I. To Formally Identify 9/11 Plane Wreckage


pilotsfor911truth.org...


Shanksville crash:


United 93 Still Airborne After Alleged Crash - According To ATC/Radar


pilotsfor911truth.org...

Yet, you OS believers continue to believe in your government fairytales that a plane crashed in Shanksville. LOL besides some “bone yard scraps,” Where is your evidence that proves you ridiculous fairytales.

Some of you OS believers want everyone to believer your phony government reports that jet fuel and office fires brought down Three WTC but only two planes stuck only two towers. LOL
I guess just office fires melted the steel in WTC and caused it to fall faster than free fall. Even NIST was forced by A&E to admit free fall on WTC 7.
But you all want us to believe the impossible.

I could go on but I don’t need to.

As far as Truthers believing in:


Holograms
Pentagon magic trick flyover
Nukes
Space beams
Missiles
TV Fakery (LOL)
Pods
The Jews did it!
Aliens


...a fraud


Most people who are researching the Truth do not support your ridiculous claims, perhaps a tiny minority, if any at all. Most of these ridiculous beliefs you posted were debunked years ago.


Like NIST proven a fraud by true science.

I think you made a typo there, you meant to say "truther science".


No typo. However you have just demonstrated how disinformationists like to take the truth and spin & twist it in a negative narrative to insult the messenger.

The Art of Disinformation
DIS-INFO AGENTS and CO-IN-TEL-PRO

educate-yourself.org...


Truthers are not interested in selling anything

Except for DVD's.. and T-shirts.. and books.. and stickers.. and banners.. and CD's.. and letters.. and cards.. and brochures.. and analyses ...

Again you twisted my words or completely misunderstood the comment to me and have taken it out of quote. However since you want to compare notes of who is making money let’s look at the government that you completely support, shell we?


USA.gov
Souvenirs from Government Institutions

More Shopping
•Government Sales and AuctionsDrug Enforcement Administration Gift Shop Kennedy Space Center Shop
•Library of Congress Souvenirs
•Mount Rushmore National Museum Store
•NASA Space Store
•National Agricultural Library Online Gift Shop
•National Archives E-Store
•National Park Passes, Maps, Books...
•National Zoo Shop
•Smithsonian Institution Shops
•Stamps and Other Collectibles
•Supreme Court Gifts
•Treasury Commemorative Products
•Treasury Recreation Association Gift Shop
•U.S. Capitol Gifts
•Vietnam Women's Memorial Foundation Store
•White House Gifts
•World War II Memorial Store

More Shopping
•Government Sales and Auctions


www.usa.gov...

what do you know! Looks to me everyone is making money.
Shell we discuss how the government and the military are profiting in the millions in contracting firms for their two illegal wars? Looks to me they are the one’s profiting the most. These little Truthers websites cannot hold a candle to the millions $ your government is raking in.
Who care who is making money, you obviously forgotten that we live in a capitalist society.

[edit on 29-7-2010 by impressme]



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 09:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by impressme
19 invisible hijackers ... four invisible commercial aircraft ...



LOL! That's a new one to add to the list, invisible hijackers and invisible planes!!!! Bwahahaha




pilotsfor911truth.org...


More bunk junk. Someday I suppose you'll realize how hard Pft has failed at making a point, ANY point, and that people do not take them serious. Unless it's inside truther circles I guess.


... jet fuel and office fires brought down Three WTC but only two planes stuck only two towers.


Yawn, same truther nonsense. I like how you leave out the undeniable FACT that a 110 story skyscraper struck WTC7. It speaks volumes on your lack of a realistic argument.



I guess just office fires melted the steel in WTC and caused it to fall faster than free fall. Even NIST was forced by A&E to admit free fall on WTC 7.


Wow, more truther myths.

Fire melted the steel.
Faster than free-fall, hmm... can you show us where A&E forced NIST to admit the building fell faster than free fall as you claim?



Most people who are researching the Truth do not support your ridiculous claims, perhaps a tiny majority, if any at all. All of these ridiculous beliefs you posted were debunked years ago.


Those aren't my claims, they're truthers claims. It's funny how some truthers want to distance themselves from those claims while believing their own equally ridiculous ones.

As far as them all being debunked, you're actually right. ALL truther claims are completely junk, and have never been proven.



Again you twisted my words...


You make the hilarious comparison of the Government gift shops for various landmarks, etc. somehow as being the same as AE911LOL selling junk to poor people who want to believe in conspiracy.

$833 worth. Anyone who bought into that should ask for a refund.

Wow CL, you failed pretty hard on this post.



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 10:16 PM
link   
reply to post by Soloist
 


Originally posted by jthomas
There will be no new investigations. "Truthers" have never been able to sell it. When the hammer hits the nail, there is absolutely no evidence that anything "Truthers" have claimed happened for the last 9 years actually happened. No evidence has ever surfaced to support "Truther" claims.


This is the quote I was answering to, that you took out of context


"Truthers" have never been able to sell it.

Truthers are not interested in selling anything, but only in supporting the evidence and the science that proves the OS is a fraud.


Let’s straighten this out right now. Again, you took my response to the above remarks completely out of context. A perfect example of a disinformationist at work. You need to stop using twisting what people say to benefit you.



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 11:05 PM
link   
reply to post by Soloist
 



As far as them all being debunked, you're actually right. ALL truther claims are completely junk, and have never been proven.


Well you have proved yourself as an “Anti- conspiratorial” and one has to wonder what you’re real agenda is. It appears your only goal in this thread is to goad and insult anyone who does not support the OS, and giving your opinions, which are based on nothing but insults with no real substance towards the OP.

If you think, your personal attacks have accomplished anything it has, you have just demonstrated how emotionally and ignorant some OS believers really are. You have a nice day.





[edit on 29-7-2010 by impressme]



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 11:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by impressme

... and giving your opinions, which are based on nothing but insults with no real substance...


But wait you said :


I guess just office fires melted the steel in WTC and caused it to fall faster than free fall. Even NIST was forced by A&E to admit free fall on WTC 7.


To which I said :

Wow, more truther myths.

Fire melted the steel.
Faster than free-fall, hmm... can you show us where A&E forced NIST to admit the building fell faster than free fall as you claim?


These appear to be your opinions obviously, since you have refused to show us all "big bad evil disinformationists on the govt. payroll" your proof of such claims.

Given that, it's rather easy and obvious to conclude that you just repeat some internet sleuth mantras and moan about "insults and personal opinions" before running off.



posted on Jul, 29 2010 @ 11:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Soloist
 


You are dishonest and disreputable. If not for the ATS T&C, I would use language better suited to describe what a cheating little person you are.

I have to laugh at how well impressme kicked your creepy butt! That’s what you get for screwing with his statements! You have a habit of using people’s quotes out of context though don’t you? You are a disturbed, sinister loser incapable of playing nicely with others. This is a good example of how people with little or no self-esteem behave.

I love this latest childlike attack on impressme! Were you bullied in school? Your comments have nothing to do with anything other than a poor attempt to confuse and mislead readers just passing through. You work afully hard at trying to make "Truthers" look bad but it seems to keep backfiring on you. You are so shallow!

I’m sure the mods will nab you eventually but that may not be soon enough. You are a real piece of bad work!



posted on Jul, 30 2010 @ 12:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by truthcounts
You are dishonest and disreputable.


Because I can see through the mad ramblings of a sock puppet? I'm very honest, I tell it like it is, and some people here cannot handle it.

Well to bad for them, they lie and distort in the name of the "truth". and I'm sure I'm not the only one that finds it pathetic.



I have to laugh at how well impressme kicked your creepy butt! That’s what you get for screwing with his statements!


LOL.

Here's his statement:


I guess just office fires melted the steel in WTC and caused it to fall faster than free fall. Even NIST was forced by A&E to admit free fall on WTC 7.


Now, look above in his reply and notice how he refuses to answer to this.

Who's dishonest and disreputable now?





You are a disturbed, sinister loser incapable of playing nicely with others. This is a good example of how people with little or no self-esteem behave.


LOL. More name calling.

When you cannot answer the questions honestly, this is what it turns to, eh?


... childlike attack ... Were you bullied in school ... You are so shallow!


LOL. Do you have anything to offer other than misguided, and quite laughable insults?



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 8  9  10    12 >>

log in

join