It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TextWe cant live pure lives with the knowledge that humanities future is not secure without a global democracy. Every human on earth must be recorded and their names must be heard and written somewhere,just as their voices,EACH SINGLE ONE must be heard as loudly as yours and mine,it is OUR JOB TO ENSURE THIS HAPPENS BEFORE WE DIE OUR NATURAL DEATHS.
And fighting is not the easy way as our governments are well aware,it is the hard way,if the money spent on the current war had been spent on initiating a global democracy using the fiscal impetuous of that much cash we would be half way there already.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by LittleSecret
The two SRR troopers were moved to another location after being handed over to the militants. Do you know what there were doing to people at that station, electric drill torture, not a nice thing. They killed the police officer after being fired on for failing to stop at the VCP. Almost everyone who was working at that police station was corrupt, like most of the Iraqi police at the time.
The Iraqi police were patrolling the area looking for suspected "terrorists" or "insurgents", and they noticed that the men were acting suspiciously. Suddenly, without warning, the suspicious men started shooting at people, but the new Iraqi security forces managed to capture some of them before they could escape. Obviously, if these men had not been caught, the mass media would now be reporting the incident as just another attempt by evil "terrorists" to create civil war in Iraq.
There have been a number of incidents in this area and throughout Iraq in which police and civilians have been targeted and killed by "terrorists" or "insurgents". But this is the first time that any of those responsible have been caught in the act, and it is now clear that at least some of them are working directly for the occupying forces, as many Iraqis have openly suspected all along.
A few days ago, in a statement unreported in the corporate mass media, Iran's most senior military official specifically linked the instability in Iraq with agents of the US and its allies: "we have information that the insecurity has its roots in the activities of American and Israeli spies."
The post-war violence in Iraq is always been blamed on "Islamic extremists" or "rival ethnic factions". Yet in the history of the country, nothing like this has ever happened before. The problems began precisely when the US and UK seized control.
The Iraqi police arrested the men and put them in prison. Unfortunately the police never had a chance to question the men and find out exactly what they were doing, because within minutes the UK sent in six tanks and an elite SAS unit to break their terrorists out of jail.
During the illegal prison break Iraqi officials were held at gunpoint, much of the jail was demolished, and all of the other criminals and insurgents were set free. The US and UK do not hesitate to use violence and terror to achieve their objectives, no matter what the consequences.
The official explanation for the illegal jail break is that somebody thought the British men might be taken away by a gang of Iraqi resistance fighters and never seen again. This is blatantly nonsense, of course, because the entire prison was entirely surrounded by British tanks and troops. With the full force of the British military at hand, the terrorists were rescued quickly and easily.
As further details emerge, the Western media increasingly presents conflicting reports about the nature and sequence of events, and the official British sources cited without question in mainstream news coverage are indicative of a classic disinformation exercise.
When local people saw what was happening the area began to erupt with angry anti-British protests.
Yes, they did, and they damn well OUGHT to be tired of fighting. That's been going on there for decades, with no letup in sight. There are people there now, who are getting up in years, and have NEVER known a time of peace, not in their entire lives. You're one of them, just not there any more. Congrats on that, by the way.
There's ALWAYS a choice. Regardless of what you say about the "resistance", we both know who is at the core of that. No, not all "resistance" fighters are Taliban, and far fewer are al-Qaida, but that's the core, the source of the fighting, the source of the motivating ideology. If the resistance gave up on the Taliban, the "Empire" would have to find another excuse, or get the hell out of dodge. No two ways about it. The "Empire" went in ostensibly after the Taliban, and al-Qaida. Removing them from the picture jerks the rug right out from under us.
If you harbor anything against the CIA, it should be that it pulled out right after the Russians did, and left an abominable power vacuum in which the warlords and the Taliban flourished, and kept the war going on, but against each other, vying for supremacy.
There were those who argued against an abrupt pullout, and FOR assistance in rebuilding, but they got over-ruled by other elements who declared the job done, since the Russians were gone, and insisted on a pullout.
Afghans suffered because of that short-sightedness, and still do.
Yes, the Taliban played that well. You are of course aware that the Taliban at no time ever controlled more than 60% of Afghanistan, and were constantly at war with the warlords and the Northern Alliance. Look at Hekmatyar. How many times has he switched sides now?
There WAS "resistance", but against the Taliban (created by the ISI, by the way, and so 'foreigners'), not "The Empire".
Indeed. Afghanistan has always been "corrupt" by foreign standards, but that really shouldn't apply internally, eh? If you guys are happy with it, then so am I. Drug production HAS increased, I believe, but the whole story isn't told just by that statement alone. The Taliban was against poppy growing, until they turned TOWARDS it to fund their war effort.
Somehow, the US and in particular the CIA gets the blame for that. Go figure.
I will, and I'll sleep well, too. Alexander and Genghis keep the notion at bay. Afghans are tough, but NO ONE is invincible.
Originally posted by LittleSecret
The conflict started due to American proxy games in the region, two oppressive empires fighting each other using countries such as Afghanistan to play their little game.
Do you know why the UN was established? It was established to set the rule of their game played, and to avoid any accountability in regards to these oppressive empires. Heck why do you suppose they hold VETO powers?
The source of fighting is not Taliban, nor Al-Qaeda, nor are they the motivating ideology.
Some Afghans are resisting because they have the belief in self defense. Some Afghans are resisting due to complete lack of law and order in the country, and the F'd up policies implemented and the double standard, and the lies.
You invade NZ, I'll say again, I'll resist with my last breath, and I will say if my fellow fighters die they will go to heaven, do you know why? Because of moral up boost, when you are fighting the world's most powerful killing machine who bomb villages and wedding parties, you need loads of moral support.
No not the CIA, the whole government of the empire, they show double standard attitude, use terrorism, invade without any justification etc etc.
Even after USSR was defeated Russia was still in the game, they just changed names and logged back in.
The Taliban came to power because there was no law and order, little girls and boys were being raped by war lords all around and that is sickening the least.
Read wikipedia on how the Taliban came to power.
No Afghans suffered because the world empires just won't leave it alone, always meddling in their internal policy.
The Taliban brought law and order which the Afghans needed after decades of war, and lawlessness. The US brought Afghanistan back to what it was, a lawless, corrupt, drug lab.
Once again, there was no resistance in Afghanistan within 4-5 year of invasion, why is that? The Afghans gave the empire a chance, because they were sick of fighting, but they saw that this empire was no better than the last, actually USSR was much better than this one, although their terrorism was not any better.
There WAS "resistance", but against the Taliban (created by the ISI, by the way, and so 'foreigners'), not "The Empire".
You mean there was invasion, not resistance?
Indeed. Afghanistan has always been "corrupt" by foreign standards, but that really shouldn't apply internally, eh? If you guys are happy with it, then so am I. Drug production HAS increased, I believe, but the whole story isn't told just by that statement alone. The Taliban was against poppy growing, until they turned TOWARDS it to fund their war effort.
Somehow, the US and in particular the CIA gets the blame for that. Go figure.
Under the Taliban there was no corruption, this is even compared to foreign standards.
When the Taliban was in control, drug production was mute, and now that the US is in control Afghanistan became the drug lab of the world, the biggest producer.
For you to twist it and blame Taliban for drug production is absurd.
Yes arrogance usually blinds people. You see, Afghans are not invincible, but they have two things.
#1. GOD
#2. Unbreakable spirit
America has already tried every trick in the book to win the war in Afghanistan, and it seems it has met with the same answer, FAIL.
THE NATO recently tried the same tactic, it failed, that is why Gen. Stanley Mc... was fired.
...The resistance denied any accountability.
..., and ofcurse it never worked in Afghanistan because of their experience in WAR.
USSR used very similar tactics throughout the war, failed miserably.
Originally posted by dizzylizzy
reply to post by Thepreye
Can you tell me which country treats women worse than the Taliban, or other Muslim states, allied or not to the USA or my country UK. Where else is stonning carried out.....for adultery.... or women forced to cover up from head to toe??
Yes women are treated badly throughout the world, but in most countries they have the law on their side.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by LittleSecret
Well unless you have proof your talking BS.
[edit on 3-7-2010 by kevinunknown]
First of all your source it totally bias but that aside why would Task Force Black even have to bother carrying out false flag opps in Iraq when in 2005 Iraq was full of militants who were blowing themselves up every day. That point right there should be the end of it, however you are so blinded you can never accept the truth.
Five US soldiers have been killed after a convoy carrying supplies for the US-led troops was attacked by the Taliban militants in Afghanistan's Zabul province.
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by Thepreye
I like how you talking about them, like you know what you’re talking about but you don’t even know their name “force reconnaissance unit” is actually called the Special Reconnaissance Regiment or SRR.
Originally posted by LittleSecret
reply to post by nenothtu
Here news update:
Five US soldiers have been killed after a convoy carrying supplies for the US-led troops was attacked by the Taliban militants in Afghanistan's Zabul province.
Remember how the Afghan resistance started attacking USSR supply convoys?
Ohh, the war experience helps, and the will power, and the moral.
The only has one, the war experience, none of the rest.
Ed€it to Add:
US moral:
More US soldiers commit suicide than killed in action
Originally posted by kevinunknown
reply to post by Thepreye
I like how you talking about them, like you know what you’re talking about but you don’t even know their name “force reconnaissance unit” is actually called the Special Reconnaissance Regiment or SRR.