It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Astyanax
It is a fine thing for intellectuals, but it provides few of the consolations simple folk look to religion to provide. Indeed, it denigrates the social emotions as mere manifestations of attachment.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by filosophia
As a force for social cohesion, promoting cooperation, reciprocity, mutual respect and cutural achievement, Christianity is infinitely superior to Buddhism.
The historical record shows this plainly.
I am the product of a society in which Theravada Buddhism is given pride of place and protected by the State. The history of my country since its independence from Britain is a sorry record indeed.
I am not generalizing from a single example; consider the state of any Theravada-dominant country - Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, Cambodia and Laos - the picture is always much the same.
The Mahayana countries have done slightly better, on the whole, though the societies this faith has built cannot, in my opinion, be compared - in quality of life, in potential for individual self-realization, in simple functionality, or in the achievements of high culture - with those built on a Christian ethos. Indeed, the two high cultures where Buddhism took root - China and Japan - were on their way to greatness long before it arrived on their shores.
This, to my mind, shows the fatal flaw of Buddhism.
It is a fine thing for intellectuals, but it provides few of the consolations simple folk look to religion to provide. Indeed, it denigrates the social emotions as mere manifestations of attachment.
Originally posted by inforeal
And what Buddhism, Islam, Christianity, Judaism, and all of them teach . . . that is compassion . . . for each other is the most important thing that can be utilized to arrive at that elusive attribute of God that we all need —Love!
Originally posted by inforeal
reply to post by ApacheChief
Faith is important becasue one has to have faith that the religious path one is on will bring change.
A genuine esoteric path has balance—esoteric and exoteric.
To lean too much either way causes imbalance.
Jesus himself, for example, was very mystical yet followed the Hebrew law
Esoteric is just more of the inner meaning of religion.
[edit on 6-7-2010 by inforeal]
[edit on 6-7-2010 by inforeal]
Buddhism is a superior philosophy to Christianity.
Buddhism holds that one gains enlightenment through their own means, not through another's means or through a God's will or forgiveness.
Christianity holds that through acceptance of Jesus Christ as the Lord and savior, one is forgiven of their sins.
Buddhism holds that through gnosis of the cause of suffering, and the relinquishing of suffering, one gains unsurpassed nirvana, which is freedom from suffering (sin).
Buddhism is based on the experience of enlightenment attained by the Buddha, which can be verified by everyone.
Christianity holds that the cause of suffering is Adam and Eve's sin of eating a forbidden fruit.
Buddhism holds that the cause of suffering is desire.
Christianity holds that God created all things, good and evil.
Buddhism states that all things are impermanent and subject to change.
Christianity believes that good people go to heaven, bad people go to hell.
Buddhism believes transcendence is more important than finding the origin of life (long since gone as it happened in the past).
Christianity believes the individual is born a sinner.
Buddhism believes the individual is a series of connected moments, called in temporary terms a 'self' but is in fact a series of dependent and therefore impermanent material states of consciousness.
Christianity believes that Jesus is the way, the truth, the life
Buddhism believes the Buddha-nature, found within all things, is the way, the truth, the life.
Originally posted by Erad3
If Christianity and Buddhism philosophy is non-fiction writing then there's a author for the literature
There's no author for the literature.
Therefore, Christianity and Buddhism philosophy is not non-fiction writing.
Ah! You'll tell every poster that you forgot your sixteenth birthday?
This is a question I am often asked, "If Buddhism is so good, than why are so many still in poverty and famine?" But I think you answered yourself, by stating, Buddhist nations such as: India, Nepal, Tibet, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam... have been victims of having their land conquered, people slaughtered (genocide) and had trade embargo's placed against them by non-buddhist people/countries. So to place any blame or guilt upon Buddhism is irrelevant and ignorant.
Anyways on another note, today is the Dalai Lama's B-day!