It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UFO caught heading into tornado. Amazing footage *Video*

page: 2
52
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by hermantinkly
And the title of this thread is misleading. The "UFO" didn't fly into the tornado and the footage was far from amazing. It isn't even a UFO anymore; it's bird as someone else said. I would delete this thread and ban the OP for being a an ignorant twat if I were a mod.


I agree. While I don't think a banning is in order, this is the 2nd thread this week where the OP has created threads where the thread title is very misleading. And yes, the 'ufo' does not fly into the Tornado, as suggested by Reeveer. To add insult to injury, the person in the video claimed that his video was making front page headlines in every major newspaper around the world. I personally find that hard to believe.


Also, whenever you see the words "Amazing" in a thread title on ATS...be prepared for the opposite.




[edit on 2-7-2010 by NightVision]




posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher


threads like this one remind me of why i joined ATS in the first place, 5 short years ago.
if i was a mod, i would consider providing some applause.



End Transmission,
ET


Im a MOD and I tend to spend a lot of time analysizng photos/videos here. Its a bird. Its 1000% a bird. You can see the wings flapping. The video is nothing but a cool storm video. There is zero UFO activity in it.

I cant even believe this made any media flap over some UFO. Anyone with fingers can hit pause/play and see...........its a bird


ETA:
For clarification: I do not think im better than anyone or an all knowing moderator or right while everyone is wrong.


[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:11 PM
link   
Thats the fastest bird i've ever seen!



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:11 PM
link   
first line

It's just a bird flying by. Noting to see here afterall.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by XxRagingxPandaxX
Thats the fastest bird i've ever seen!


Birds fly fast.

www.stanford.edu...


Generally birds follow the facetious advice often given to pilots -- "fly low and slow." Most cruise speeds are in the 20-to-30-mph range, with an eider duck having the fastest accurately clocked air speed of about 47 mph. During a chase, however, speeds increase; ducks, for example, can fly 60 mph or even faster, and it has been reported that a Peregrine Falcon can stoop at speeds of 200 mph (100 mph may be nearer the norm). Interestingly, there is little relationship between the size of a bird and how fast it flies. Both hummingbirds and geese can reach roughly the same maximum speeds.



[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:15 PM
link   
A rogue mod must've deleted my last post. Sorry about his/her behavior. I meant to say that the thread title was misleading because the "UFO" clearly did not fly into the tornado and the footage was far from amazing. Also, the UFO is no longer "unidentified" because it's a brid, as someone else said. And the footage is almost three years old; I remember hearing about it on the Art Bell show. They didn't think it was anything special -- just another crappy, unconvincing video of a vague blob of light streaking through the shot. Next.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:15 PM
link   
reply to post by noisemedia
 



LOL. How many birds do you know can fly 900 mph and veer to the left?



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


You being a mod does not automatically make you correct, you couldn't even post some screencaps to prove your point... Now, I agree this isn't some kind of flying saucer but just stating that, "It's a bird. I am a mod so I'm right." doesn't make it so and only harms your credibility.

I vote for insect flying fairly close to the lens, with the distortions due to it being out of focus combined a slow shutter speed and low quality youtube encoding. Pretty much like the whole "Rods" thing.

[edit on 2-7-2010 by Goathief]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hedera Helix
reply to post by noisemedia
 



LOL. How many birds do you know can fly 900 mph and veer to the left?



How do you know its flying 900 mph. Id love to know how you came to this conclusion. Birds fly fast. Fact.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Goathief
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


You being a mod does not automatically make you correct, you couldn't even post some screencaps to prove your point... Now, I agree this isn't some kind of flying saucer but just stating that, "It's a bird. I am a mod so I'm right." doesn't make it so and only harms your credibility.

I vote for insect flying fairly close to the lens, with the distortions due to it being out of focus combined a slow shutter speed. Pretty much like the whole "Rods" thing.


Where did I say that? Please copy and paste where I said those words. Thank you. Otherwise, you are completely just making things up.

He wanted a MOD to applaud, I said im a MOD and voiced why I dont think its that big of a deal - because its a bird.

I took screen caps. But I dont have video editing software to slow down and get proper shots. I told you how you can see wings flapping. Are you saying you did this and see no wings flapping?

[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:20 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


You evidently didn't watch the entire video where the expert calculates that the object is 30ft long, 18ft high in the centre and travelling between 9000-16,000mph.

I don't think he is correct, but you should as a all-knowing moderator at least watch the entire video before dismissing people's arguments.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:20 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


But the broadcast quality footage of this video was analyzed by the Marshall Space Flight Center, and what they said was that this object was 30ft long, 18ft thick, flying at an altitude of 500-700ft and travelling at 9-16,000 MPH.

You're basically saying that the experts at Marshall Space Flight Center are wrong on that? Or like the poster above said.. it's the FASTEST and BIGGEST bird I have ever seen. The analysis of the video even shows it goes behind a cloud and comes back out.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Goathief
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


You evidently didn't watch the entire video where the expert calculates that the object is 30ft long, 18ft high in the centre and travelling between 9000-16,000mph.

I don't think he is correct, but you should as a all-knowing moderator at least watch the entire video before dismissing people's arguments.


I watched the objects in the video. I didnt need sound. The sound has nothing to do with what is being seen.

And your rude remarks are completely unnecessary.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:22 PM
link   
Dupe

[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by ReeVeeR
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 



If you pause/play the video you can see wings flapping. I am not the only one seeing this. Its pretty obvious when you pause/play over and over.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 


There are no rude remarks at all, apologies if you have taken offence as none was intended.

Anyway, you asked in a slightly antagonising manner how someone knew it was travelling 900mph - I assume they typo'd the quoted 9000mph from the video, which you would have known if you listened to the expert analysis nearer the end. That is why it is relevant, and why you should have watched the video in it's entirety before calling someone out.



[edit on 2-7-2010 by Goathief]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:30 PM
link   
reply to post by greeneyedleo
 



I guess you never listened to what was said during the video. If I recall correctly... when the tape was analyzed... the guy said the object had been estimated to have been travelling between 900-1600 mph. And why would all these people swarm down on him over something he had no knowledge of if the tape hadn't already been properly analyzed and authenicated? This guy lost his job over the fan-fare caused by this tape. It better not be a flippin' hoax... or he could sue the people behind the hoax.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Hedera Helix
 


The speed was 9000-16,000 MPH. A lot faster. And the Marshall Space Flight Center said that... not some Joe on the street.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by ReeVeeR
reply to post by Hedera Helix
 


The speed was 9000-16,000 MPH. A lot faster. And the Marshall Space Flight Center said that... not some Joe on the street.


I stand corrected on the speed. And so it ain't no flippin' bird.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:38 PM
link   
I wonder why Skeet Vaughan didnt say it was a bird.

Strange !!



new topics

top topics



 
52
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join