It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Soviet Question

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 10:39 AM
link   
If America doesn't have or has never had the technology to land on the moon, why should the Soviet union have the technology to put the first Satelite into outer space or put the first people in outer space and achieving the first spacewalk?

After all, if the Van Allen belt makes it impossible for America to go to the moon, why would it allow the Soviet Union to be the first people in outer space?

Or is this "we never landed on the moon" stuff purely an American thing?

To my knowledge, I have never heard of people who believe that the moon landings are a hoax never apply this belief towards the Soviet accomplishments in space travel.




posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 10:43 AM
link   
About the american moon landing being a hoax, i just want to say that indeed it is a hoax. After the alien structures and technology found on the moon ( data which could not be shown to the general public) they had to film a fake landing on the moon so that data might not be available to the general public.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 10:55 AM
link   
reply to post by xspinx
 


What alien structures?



why should the Soviet union have the technology to put the first Satelite into outer space or put the first people in outer space and achieving the first spacewalk?


Russian rocket technology is extremely advanced, maybe even more so than America. And at the time, Russia spent more money on there space programme, America was spending very little.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Johnze
 


www.youtube.com...


And check my profile at ATS video and media for more pictures.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:09 AM
link   
reply to post by xspinx
 


You are, of course, entitled to your opinion, but the idea that the moon landing was a hoax is utterly ridiculous! There are no alien structures on the moon.
Please don't bother posting stupid YouTube videos or any other "evidence".
The idea is the province of the uneducated, and is so totally silly on so many levels that's it's pointless to discuss.
The moon landing hoax is one of the absolute dumbest modern BS myths there is, right up there with Earth being 6,000 years old!



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:11 AM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 

Yes, the moon landing hoax really is on the fringe regarding conspiracy theories, gives us all a bad name when there are legitimate conspiracies to ponder about....i put it in the same category as shape shifting reptilians, NWO and the galactic federation of light in all honesty....

[edit on 2-7-2010 by Solomons]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:12 AM
link   
Going to the moon is different than doing a space walk. You can space walk this side of the Van Allen belt but you have to pass through the belt to go to the moon. You need to ask why hasn't Russia put a man on the moon? I don't think it's as simple as been there done that.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:13 AM
link   
reply to post by xspinx
 


Im sorry but that video doesnt prove anything. Do you have any photo images, such as those taken perhaps by amatuer astronomers?



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by OldDragger
reply to post by xspinx
 


You are, of course, entitled to your opinion, but the idea that the moon landing was a hoax is utterly ridiculous! There are no alien structures on the moon.
Please don't bother posting stupid YouTube videos or any other "evidence".
The idea is the province of the uneducated, and is so totally silly on so many levels that's it's pointless to discuss.
The moon landing hoax is one of the absolute dumbest modern BS myths there is, right up there with Earth being 6,000 years old!



So true the moon landing was not a hoax and the earth is not 6000 years old.
It's 5770 years old... maybe... depending on if you believe in the OLD EARTH THEORY(6 Billion years old) or the YOUNG EARTH THEORY.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:16 AM
link   
I am looking for information here so please excuse my ignorance.

How can the moon landing be a hoax and then in turn proved by showing us a video of armstrong on the moon?



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:22 AM
link   
reply to post by zroth
 


The landing video on the moon that was transmitted "live" in 1969 is fake, made in a studio.

The real video was not shown to the public because of the discoveries made there.

Check my ATS video and media profile for more pictures.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:29 AM
link   
Time for me to be a wet blanket again!
ATS is full of....goofy stuff today!
NOT ALL KNOWLEDGE IS CONTAINED IN THE INTERNET KIDS!
Knowledge did not begin with You tube!
There are things called "books" in places called "Libraries" where we have thousands of years of collected knowledge.
Science is not intuitive! There are disciplines that require a lifetime of study!
SURFING THE INTERNET AND THINKING YOU ARE AN EXPERT, simply means you know jack about "theories" and "research!



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:32 AM
link   
reply to post by zroth
 


Well it's kind of like watching the Armageddon movie and believing it was real. Just because you watched something on film doesn't make it the truth. Try watching the evening news for example.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:34 AM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 


Indeed, go to a library and take a 101 moon landing for dummies.

And those libraries with" thousands of years of collected knowledge" are full with dumb books ( in our days every fool can write a book, porn stars are writing books for kids :| ). So not every book in a library is full of knowledge. And if you talk about ancient texts with real knowledge, they are hidden in museums etc. and once every 50-100 another text pops out at the surface to educate dumb people, and a dumb scientist makes a dumb comment on, lets take for example a greek text of philosophy , and destroys the text's real meaning ,and future generations of dumber people are born.

[edit on 2-7-2010 by xspinx]



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:36 AM
link   
reply to post by xspinx
 


Insults don't change a thing.
Sci/fi is fiction. Your "theory" is fiction.
Believe whatever! I certainly don't care
!
But it's just plain.......wrong.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:39 AM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 


I agree somewhat but the internet is the new library. You just have to know what section is B.S. and which is mandatory reading. There is a 50/50 B.S. to Fact ratio on the web, but that doesn't mean a library book has the whole truth either. They can be just as diluted. The internet has increase the availability of information, hence the name "Information Superhighway".



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:43 AM
link   
Guys guys guys, please let's stick to the fact that the Soviet Union was never in outer space in the first place and that they couldn't have had the technology to put Sputnik in orbit or put the first people in space. These things are simply a hoax, and could not have happened.



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:44 AM
link   
reply to post by OldDragger
 


You answered before i had the chance to edit the post, so please read the post again



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 11:46 AM
link   
reply to post by evilminime
 


Facts?

Have fun kids! The entire premise of this thread is...uh, silly. I'm outta here!



posted on Jul, 2 2010 @ 12:18 PM
link   
reply to post by evilminime
 


I know this might sound incredibly nerdy but hey am a massive nerd so i don’t care. When i was younger i won some physics prize were they sent me to a “space camp” being run in the UK but by people for NASA and the ESA. Anyway at one point i got talking to a ex NASA engineer, who didn’t work on the Apollo missions but was understandably very knowledgeable. Anyway in the conversation I told him about my fascination with conspiracies of various types in the course of this I asked something along the lines of “prove to me man landed on the moon” his response was something along the lines of this.

In 1969 the Americans and Soviets were watching everything America was doing (we had discussed ECHELON as well but that’s for another time). He told me that had the moon landings been a fake the Russians would have came out right away and tell us all that it was a fake, as they were tracing the space craft. I challenged him about other stuff like wind, shadows and lighting. He basically said that anyone could put forward any logical theory pointing to a faked landing however the fact was that they couldn’t do it because the Russians would have called them on it right away. And he did actually explain some of that stuff to me as well like reasons why the flag may have appeared to have shown wind.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join