Obama tries to put Republicans on immigration hot seat, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times
Topic started on 1-7-2010 @ 02:01 PM by guohua
Obama calls AZ immigration law 'unenforceable'...

Seeking to inject urgency into the push for an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, President Obama on Thursday called on Republicans to join the effort, telling them he can't pass a bill without them.

After pushing through an economic stimulus bill and health care with barely any Republican support in the first 16 months of his administration, the president said this issue is too dangerous to tackle — for Democrats and the GOP — without having both parties involved.

"I'm ready to move forward, the majority of Democrats are ready to move forward, and I believe the majority of Americans are ready to move forward. But the fact is without bipartisan support, as we had just a few years ago, we cannot solve this problem," Mr. Obama told about 250 immigration-rights advocates in a speech at American University in Washington.

On the hottest flash point in the debate, Arizona's new law targeting illegal immigrants, Mr. Obama said the rules are "unenforceable" for local police. But he didn't give any indication when the administration will file an expected lawsuit seeking to block the new law, which takes effect at the end of this month.

Mr. Obama has already missed his own self-imposed deadline for getting a broad immigration bill passed. During the 2008 presidential campaign he told Hispanic audiences he wanted a bill in his first year.

And his new push is unlikely to bear fruit this year.

Advocates on both sides of the issue say they don't expect Congress to tackle the issue before the elections, both because of the already-crowded legislative schedule and because there is no clear consensus on how to proceed.

Key Republicans say the borders must be secured first before the government considers legalizing illegal immigrants, and they point to recent violent incidents — including the killing of an Arizona rancher — as evidence the border is still not under control.

But Democrats argue that legalizing illegal immigrants has to be done at the same time, both for practical reasons and because they fear if the borders are secured first, it might sap momentum from the push for legalization.

"Our borders are just too vast for us to be able to solve the problem only with fences and border patrols," Mr. Obama said. "It won't work."
MODS: Please move or delete if need be, Thank You.
Source: The Washington Times.com
Source: The Drudge Report.com

[edit on 1-7-2010 by guohua]


reply posted on 1-7-2010 @ 02:38 PM by whaaa
reply to post by guohua



It's OK to rant. It's also OK to express your opinion on how you would close the borders with Mexico, what to do with all the illegals that are already here.

I to was retired briefly until the stock mkt crashed and took my retirement with it and forced me back to work.

Going back to work was the best thing that could ever happen to me. You can only drink beer and play golf or go fishing for so long until it become boring.

Trashing Obama without creative suggestions on how to change just sounds like parroting back Rush, Sean and Glen; Crybaby whining, Pretty lame imo.


I have no doubt that the GOP will take back both houses. How will they change things? More taxcuts for the rich? Expanded wars? Welfare for the corporations with our tax money?




[edit on 1-7-2010 by whaaa]



reply posted on 1-7-2010 @ 02:47 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by guohua



Oh, no....more GOP "talking points" and phrases???

Dear Leader


This is disgusting, and yet another new low for the 'far-right' wing of the loony republican fringes...

I first encountered this insulting term used in reference to the President of the United States whilst reading a tabloid far-right rag that's distributed (for free) here in the Washington, D.C. area and suburbs... the Washington Examiner. (I look through it for a laugh, and a lark sometimes...and it has good crossword, and other puzzles).

Michelle Malkin is a blathering idiot who is billed as an Examiner "columnist" --- BUT she is syndicated (like many of these vile bastions of banality) by some company called Creators Syndicate.

In her "column" today, 1st July 2010, I first encountered that phrase in reference, and a little bile entered my throat...but, like many, she gets HER marching orders from the top, and just goes along, like an obedient little dog.

The fringe right will stoop at nothing, it seems, in their attmepts to denigrate and sabotage --- at every turn.

"Politics as usual" doesn't apply here....when the GOP had the White House, and most of Congress, their shady dealings and unwarranted arm-twisting were apologized for, by others in their party.

When the GOP was in power, opposition leaders usually had too much class to lower themselves to these tactics...and that's a shame. It's time to fight back, and keep the heat on these hypocrites....


reply posted on 1-7-2010 @ 03:52 PM by prionace glauca
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to
post by guohua



Oh, no....more GOP "talking points" and phrases???



Can you see that the OP is from Arizona? Talking points are from those who follow the crowd into believing things without having witnessed the reality themselves.

OP I am in concurrence with what you have stated. You can't have comprehensive reform without taking care of the problem first. The problem is the porous borders and those individuals bent on keeping it that way.


reply posted on 1-7-2010 @ 05:19 PM by centurion1211
Originally posted by whaaa
reply to
post by guohua



It's OK to rant. It's also OK to express your opinion on how you would close the borders with Mexico, what to do with all the illegals that are already here.

[edit on 1-7-2010 by whaaa]


Yes. what to do with all the illegals already here until you can give them the right to vote - for democrats?

Of course, some are already doing that.



Logically, that can be the ONLY reason democrats are opposing enforcing the AZ law, which is almost a copy of the federal law. The dems know they'll need the votes in 2012. The way you can know this is that no dem will ever give you a straight answer on why illegals shouldn't be deported when they are found.



[edit on 7/1/2010 by centurion1211]


reply posted on 1-7-2010 @ 10:12 PM by guohua
OK I'm Back

I want to say thanks to my friends for saying what needed to be said in this thread.
THANK YOU

Now about Bashing Obama, Come On, That's so easy. He's a Dunce or a complete idiot. I guess he's both.
He has only one idea between his big ears, get more welfare voters for the Democrats. Get these people Amnesty and on Welfare, Don't worry, the middle class is still taxable. We haven't taken grandmas or grandpas teeth yet.

Obama is suppose to be smart but he's going to give Amnesty to people that don't want to pay taxes, don't want to stay in America, don't want to assimilate and or learn our language.

The peoples from south of the boarder, send most of their monies to their home Country and leave to live off the exchange rate.

We know why he's doing it, Voters, Acorn is getting worn out, used all the dead people grave stones this last time around. He needs new blood.

I almost forgot: (must be age) Creative Suggestions, I know Obama has none. Except AMNESTY.
My creative suggestions are as follows, When an illegal is discovered, that illegal and family is sent back to the Country they came in from, Anchor Babies, They go to, I know, I know It's not their fault. Your right, it's the parents fault and the child can reapply at 18 to reenter if they have kept a clean record. With a clean back ground they go to the top of the list, first inline.

Another creative suggestion, how about Obama letting the states manage the boarders with the help of their Nation Guards Women and Men and the Boarder Patrol. I believe that deadly force should be used when drug cartels are encountered.

Obama ( Dear Leader ) could not think of this things, why, we'd lose his voting base.

[edit on 1-7-2010 by guohua]

[edit on 1-7-2010 by guohua]


reply posted on 1-7-2010 @ 10:35 PM by bagari
reply to post by Wolf321



Someone in Washington really should be talking about the number of jobs that could be created (at least temporarily) in the construction of a 1969 mile border fence. Perhaps that alone could swing some public pressure into making it happen.



reply posted on 2-7-2010 @ 01:41 AM by guohua
reply to post by Erica1631



I'm pretty sure the Democrats just want to keep the Brown Man Down.


Depending on them for all their needs. That's what Democrat do.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



While we were Distracted with Gay Marriage news This happend today
  Posted 18 days ago with 81 member flags
People are marching in the streets all over Quebec
  Posted 3 days ago with 72 member flags
Breaking: Ron Paul to end active campaigning - cnn
  Posted 14 days ago with 26 member flags
President Obama Affirms His Support for Same Sex Marriage
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
Anon has released 1.7 GB of files....
  Posted 6 days ago with 24 member flags
Police Tasings Might Finally Be Ruled Brutality
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags