Can the light saber be made?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times


reply posted on 14-6-2004 @ 06:20 PM by HeirToBokassa
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Then, you could use the anti-grenade shield currently being developed for British tanks along the wire.


Although the anti-grenade shield has been described as a "force field", in reality it is capable of only discharging destructive current in short bursts. Trying to make a "lightsaber" out of this would result in something like a tazer, except that the range would be shorter... Also both the anti-grenade shield and the tazer rely on two separate pieces of metal with different potentials. The lightaber would have to be wide enough to allow for two metal rails separated by an insulator. Anyway, it wouldn't cut stuff, just zap stuff. Which is cool enough... the tazer is better IMO because it has the advantage of firing projectiles.

ADDED: Actually, if the power source for charging up this "lightsaber" were separate, say in a backpack and connected by wires, then I could see it having some staying power. However, it seems that if two of these "lightsabers" touched, it would cause both power packs to explode. A surge protector could possibly prevent that, but it would be destroyed in the process, so the next time there wouldn't be any protection. Actually to disarm such a "lightsaber" just fire some metallic projectiles at it to short-circuit it. Maybe some kind of metallic silly string. This weapon doesn't sound too promising.

[edit on 14-6-2004 by HeirToBokassa]



reply posted on 14-6-2004 @ 09:02 PM by HeirToBokassa
Originally posted by sardion2000
...and he said you would need a 4 inch thick superconducting cable attached to a genorator that can produce over 1 MW/minute to be able to have a workable "lightsaber".
[edit on 14-6-2004 by sardion2000]


Someone else had mentioned the
anti-grenade shield [telegraph.co.uk] as the principle for this "lightsaber." For this reason I expected the cable requirements to be more modest, as stated in the source:

But despite the high charge, the electrical load on the battery is no more than that caused by starting the engine on a cold morning.

But what principle is the working "lightsaber" you mention based on? Does it behave like the fictional one -- does it have an energy blade that can be projected from the handle up to a certain distance, where the entire expanse of the blade can cut through most objects, but ceases to exist at exactly x cm from the grip? Would it be able to come in contact with another such "lightsaber" without ceasing to function?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 7 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 12 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 0 days ago with 5 member flags