posted on Jul, 3 2010 @ 12:57 AM
As was previously stated, this happens every two years or so. Inn fact I do believe that the propoganda has been stating since 2005 that Iran is 2-3
years from building nukes. 5 years laters, and they continue to use the same timeline, 2-3 years.
This is not even the largest buildup we have had in the gulf either. There was once, I believe back in '07 or '08 FOUR carrier groups in the gulf at
once time, but only temporarily.
Iran does not want nukes, and the West knows this. It is the only reason they come so close to open warfare. Nuclear states do not directly attack
other nuclear states. Just look at North Korea, are they surrounded by Carrier groups? Nope, too expensive to replace. NK has detonated nuclear
weapons in tests and big-mouthed generals routinely threatens a nuclear holocaust to Japan, South or invading forces as retaliation for any hostile
I do not see war with Iran anyways. Those of you who only see the technical side also fail to take into account terrain and climate as a factor in any
war. Iraq is relatively flat or very low elevation with not many places to hide geographically speaking. It is why Iraq was easier to conquer than
Afghanistan. More than half of Afghanistan is very rough terrain that is not friendly to even some of the most advanced electronics. Deep valleys
easily interfere with commmunications and high rugged mountains can just as easily interfere with radar in Iran as well.
You guys have any idea how much easier it is to shoot at aircraft utilizing actual people and line of
sight? Thats what brought a F-117 bomber down in 1999
If you read about
the enemies tactics in keeping his missle batteries intact, that could be just as easily achievable in Iran.
Just saying destroying Iran is not as walk in the park as some people believe. American forces do not have invisible magic shields around every air
unit you know.