So...you joined basically to bash Icke?

OK..but you'll find there are plenty of Icke bashing threads already.

What you have to understand about Icke and others who are out of the mainstream, and have an anti-establishment message, is that they are certain to attract disinfo agents, and others who stand to lose by what he has to say.

I would guess that certain forum members (on the Icke forum) have been judged to have an agenda that has disruption and misdirection of forum members as it's goal.

Regardless of validity of this, perception of it is enough to get posts deleted if it is judged to be a deliberate attempt to discredit or divert.

It happens on this forum all the time too.

Lots of people have posts, sometimes whole threads deleted.

So, if you genuinely feel you've been wronged or one of your 'colleagues' has been wronged in some way on the Icke forum, you'll probably feel the same way on here, sooner or later.

I'm curious why you started you post saying 'David Icke', then changed to simply 'Icke' when referring to David?

You're simply another Icke basher aren't you. I'll warn you that the membership here (on the whole) is a little more sophisticated than your average chat forum membership, and can usually spot an alternate agenda at 100 paces!

That's an interesting point in the linked file regarding David's inconsistencies in his own material about St. Germain.

Thanks for pointing it out.

Unfortunately this happens on ALL forums.

Sometimes the mods/owners have a hidden agenda, maybe nothing more suspicious than saving face or ensuring their site has a better reputation than other similar sites.

But others are right, unfortunately you cannot post information here until you have amassed 20 posts. Welcome anyway, enjoy the place.

David is OK, he means well, Ive met him and been to one of his seminars, read a couple of his books and been on his news letter, he knows a lot, but its too much to transfer into books and tell people. Too much information can overload us, and too much negative energy is what David gives too much of his time, books and talks to. I'd had enough of him after receiving his news letters via email, its was all negative stuff doing my head in, but someone has to tell people the truth and that's all hes doing.
His information ruined his career in football commentary, and any chances his son had of following in his dads footsteps as a professional goal keeper, it also ruined his marriage, but he seems happy with his life while showing us all awful stuff. People need to find a balance with the truth, when u get to a point of knowing about it all you don't wanna know anymore, and start blocking the awful out then look to the good of humanity instead of just the bad.
David means well but there's loads of negative energy in his recent words, in a way of creating awful emotions in people when they learn of this stuff. Its not all doom and gloom on this planet but that's what David gives much of his energy to. He is only reporting what he knows, but for me balance needs to be addressed between learning of all the good stuff as well as the bad stuff.