It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by tauristercus
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Originally posted by tauristercus
Each time that one of these "time travel" threads appears here on ATS, I find myself making the statement that any attempt to time travel, especially in a backwards direction, is absolutely positively PROHIBITED by nature itself.
No if, and or buts ... utterly and completely PROHIBITED.
Yeah, we better tell LANL. They haven't gotten the memo yet.
I'm sure that the paper you referenced makes fascinating reading and is absolutely full of interesting science/physics ... however, a simpler and more intuitive reason for my stating that (backwards) time travel would be vehemently opposed by nature is for the crucial fact that the inherent and unpredictable nature of quantum mechanics/theory and especially the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, would come crashing down in a major fail.
[edit on 29/6/10 by tauristercus]
Wait...before i respond, did you just refute a link i posted without even bothering to click on it? You are so sure of your own reasoning and logic that you have no need to even consider something outside of it?
Wow, i think i have seen it all. I will leave you to your ego.
Originally posted by tauristercus
I'd appreciate that you didn't jump to such an unwarranted conclusion.
I did indeed examine the paper referenced by your link
"Through the Looking Glass with Phase Conjugation"
and unless I completely missed it, there was NO reference whatsoever to time travel in any form. Rather the paper you linked to, interesting as it may be to some, was one concerned entirely with optics, wave propagation, holography, phase-conjugate refelection ... essentially the topic was about light propagation and the modification of said propagation in interesting and novel ways.
So why you even linked such an unrelated paper to this thread is beyond me ... and furthermore explains why I effectively dismissed it as of no consequence to the current discussion of time travel.
[edit on 30/6/10 by tauristercus]
Optical phase conjugation is a technique for reversing both the direction of propagation and the overall phase factor of an incoming wave. More precisely, optical wave conjugation has been described as a non-linear optical process for generating an output polarization that radiates a time-reversal optical field with a spatial phase profile proportional to the complex conjugate of an input optical field.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
In my example, the object that is in motion, if there is no time, would either never be acted upon by an outside force, or it would always be acted upon by the outside force. Time is what differentiates the change in state. It is the measurement from one "frame of refrerence" to the next.
Originally posted by MY2Commoncentsworth
The 1st dimension permits you to travel east or west. The 2nd allows you to travel north and south. The 3rd permits you to travel up, to the tenth floor. And the fourth, Time, allows the meeting to take place on schedule.
[edit on 30-6-2010 by MY2Commoncentsworth]
Originally posted by alexlo
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
In my example, the object that is in motion, if there is no time, would either never be acted upon by an outside force, or it would always be acted upon by the outside force. Time is what differentiates the change in state. It is the measurement from one "frame of refrerence" to the next.
Maybe I didn't understand,but why does the object need time to change state?? It takes time,yes,but time is not needed to change state.I think that the outside force is what differentiates the change of state. We on the other hand find it usefull to determine how long it took to do this. I understand though how time is the measurement from one frame of refrerence to the next and agree
[edit on 1-7-2010 by alexlo]
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
What do you mean "time is not needed to change state"? Time, relative to whatever is changing state, is key. The essence of time is marking these changes in state. If something is, but is not more, then at one TIME it existed. The change in state defines the time scale.
Originally posted by alexlo
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
What do you mean "time is not needed to change state"? Time, relative to whatever is changing state, is key. The essence of time is marking these changes in state. If something is, but is not more, then at one TIME it existed. The change in state defines the time scale.
I'm so sorry if I become annoying it's just my will to understand and know. What I mean is that we only need time as a reference point to something that is,has or will happen. There are other forces that make the change of state happen,not time. Like the movement of the sun,is time responsible for that????? Time is something that exists only in our mind I think.
Thanks again
Originally posted by Archirvion
As a scientist i can inform you that time travel WORKS. Nicola Tesla made a huge breakthrough within it. Since i work with this subject i cannot say anything more though, everything will come in the right time.
If you havent noticed yet, we scientists and governments usually wait 10\30 years AFTER we actually invent something or get a 100% perfect result to inform the public.
One of the reasons is that the mainstream humans are referred as sheep.
The other reason is that we dont see the reason for informing them,if they cant use it,they dont need it.
A very weird choice of words in the article i must say.
Have a nice day.
Minneapolis Science Facility
Originally posted by galadofwarthethird
Time does not exist, however travelling to futures and the pasts is possible though its not called time travel because time does not exist. solve that smart'y pants. And lets not forget relativity and causality, man must get up in the morning so he can go to work, so man invents a device called a clock and an excuse for a clock called time. Man hates his job it sucks so he thinks of a way to make it go faster to make the clock go faster, but since time does not exist he just cant turn the clock hands to desired time so he can get off work "because time does not exist" Man is always trapped in the present so he thinks a way to escape it, hence time travel to the future a better present. Now backwards time travel that is more tricky and crazy because traveling to the past is not a good idea the past sucks thats why the present and the future were invented.
I don't think we interact with 2 dimensions of time. Quite frankly, I don't even think we interact with one.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by 11:11
That is one of my favorite videos. It has been around a long time (before YouTube). But it still is something i watch occasionally so as to not forget it.
Time, in the explanation in that video, can be viewed as a 3 dimensional existence of which we only interact with 2 dimensions (moving in 1 direction on a line). If it were 3-d for us, we could choose to go to a time, just like we go to a place. We would only be confined by distance. a 4-d time would make distance a moot issue.