It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Huge Alien Structure Revealed - Far Side of the Moon 2010 *PHOTOS*

page: 7
87
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
 


No No No

What you have here is some badly out of focus blown up pics
where each pixel represents a hundred meters.

You could also take a picture of a grain of sand blow it up to look
like an Asteroid, but it's not.

When things are blown up that much they become distorted and
can be made to look anything. I think one of them looks like Elvis.




posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 07:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
I didn't saw it mentioned (although I may have missed it), but does anyone know the ID for the original Lunar Orbiter photo?


Still looking mate...

I'd also like to get my mits on the BLACKED OUT part of google moon
... From what I have looked at re LO images - the LO IVs seem to be the most elusive!

The LOIVs at NASAs site looked .... "Apolloed down" if you get my drift... but the LOVs on the University site look crisp and sharp ...
ser.sese.asu.edu...
I just saw this and thought "wow"! - and I can't seem to see any evidence in the 'strip' taken that suggests anything but what I think it is - Artificial in structure!

If anyone finds the original please post away!



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 07:08 PM
link   
I actually know what it is, and will now share it with you all.

It's actually a hidden lunar base for the Rebel Alliance, who is attacking an evil Empire from a galaxy far, far away.

Soon someone is going to be tracked to that moon base by the Evil Empire, and they're all gonna appear with a huge moonlike structure, which is actually a planet killer, and it will take out both the earth's natural satellite, and then the earth, just for fun.

Sorry to ruin all your guys fun. But this is proof that the end is near.

I heard it from a friend who has a friend who knows someone in the army that said it was true.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 07:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by seanizle
Looks legit to me, you can see detail in the structure, along with shadows. The picture is from the 1960's, and if it is just an "Artifact", why completely smudge it out in the newer photos.....

As of now I think its real. Its been proven time and time again that NASA tamper's with their images, this is just another case of it.

If this is proven to be legit, someone needs to push this as evidence that NASA truly is covering something up.



[edit on 29-6-2010 by seanizle]


Werd. And until Richard C. Hoagland confirms it....it is just

meh

;-)



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 07:15 PM
link   
I've lost all interest in being bothered by this nonsense. Nonsense is not at the OP. Nonsense being the nature of photographs.

We could see Jabba the Hutt, himself, floating over the surface of the moon in a skiff from multiple satellites, and multiple angles and sources.

It will *always* be image artifacting NO MATTER WHAT. Star destroyer? Artifact. Wierd spinning disc? Image stitching. Harry Potter? Yeah, rubber stamp tool because the photo data is being EXTRAPOLATED over empty sectors.

When they say "pics, or it didn't happen" I think, why? What's the point? Everything is a hoax now NO MATTER WHAT, and if it isn't a hoax, it's image artifacting NO MATTER WHAT.

Looking at pictures from space is the biggest waste of time anyone interested in UFO's could do. I'm sorry to say it, but there it is.

All I can recommend is sitting in a lawn chair at night and experience a sighting for yourself. Because a picture of a UFO is far more worthless than ever than eyewitness testimony when it comes to hard evidence.

There is no such thing as a photograph that will prove incontrovertibly intelligent alien life and change the world's mind. So why keep looking for, AND AT photographs, as if they're the panacea, or holy grail of UFO research? NO ONE WILL ACCEPT THEM! EVER!



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 07:24 PM
link   
How did this thread receive 50+ flags? It is clear that the 'building' is a stretched portion of the lunar surface. Come on people, think for yourselves.

Oh well, nothing that isn't said before.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 07:29 PM
link   
while it is true that no one picture will ever prove anything when it comes to these anomolies, however, we must keep searching because one piece to a puzzle is a useless mishapen randomly colored piece of cardboard, but when connected to many other peices it can form a beautiful picture.. If we find these anomolies on a repetitive basis to a point where we begin to see similar structures over and over again, then we have something my friends.
I can understand the people who hesitate and try to debunk these images, they serve a very important purpose to not let us get carried too far away, but some of them are the obnoxious know it alls we all hated in high school. The ones that throw their genius at you in flaming stink balls. They will deny everything you show and try to confuse you with their overpowering egos. We are a wide spectrum of souls, we must learn to use each other to balance ourselves.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:19 PM
link   
Some people will not believe until they walk on the moon themselves and see the proof...even then many would ignore it.

Moon banding is called artifacts of film strips being put together, even though film strip joining cannot cause tectangular structures and regularly spaced constructs...and obvious constructs like this one get called ' stretching' or we get jokes about wristwatches..

Proof of official image tampering is massive and available with a click of the mouse. Vast lunar towers are smudged out, huge blocks of buildings, roads, bridges and more are all made to belnd into terrain, but cannot be done to a degree that hides the truth from those who would seek.

There are two types of people, those who know the truth, and those who think they know the truth...only one group is right.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:19 PM
link   
I can do this is photoshop. Smudge tool at 100%.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by SKUNK2

Originally posted by seanizle
Looks legit to me, you can see detail in the structure, along with shadows. The picture is from the 1960's, and if it is just an "Artifact", why completely smudge it out in the newer photos.....

As of now I think its real. Its been proven time and time again that NASA tamper's with their images, this is just another case of it.

If this is proven to be legit, someone needs to push this as evidence that NASA truly is covering something up.



[edit on 29-6-2010 by seanizle]

If you actually knew what you *snip* were talking about you'd see that "artifact LOL" is 49km across. It doesn't exist on newer photos because they have much more detail that shows that nothing is there. Not forgetting the FACT any idiot would be able to get a telescope and see that 49km across "LOL artifact"


[edit on 29-6-2010 by sanctum]



hahahahaha....except its on the far side of the moon.

Figure out how to get "any idiot with a telescope" to site THAT one in, smart guy.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:33 PM
link   
Google Earth has Moon view. Seems like those videos were from just that. The still images are ok tho, and those are what I'm referring to as being photoshoped.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:37 PM
link   
Its strange how one of the world's most advanced tech organization have such terrible skills in photo shopping. Why are they making it so obvious that photos have been manipulated with air brushing, stretching etc.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by -Thom-
How did this thread receive 50+ flags? It is clear that the 'building' is a stretched portion of the lunar surface. Come on people, think for yourselves.

Oh well, nothing that isn't said before.


So, perhaps you have a theory on who stretched it, and why?

I would love to find a viable rationale for why OUR photo's that NASA has are being altered before we, the taxpayer/boss, gets to see them?



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Sahrhyce
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow
 

It is because someone has got to it and stretched the photo at a later date. Some one should photo shop the newer streched images and decrease them back to the original non-stretched way




I do believe that there is relics on the moon, but this isn't one of them. At first I thought it was on another forum until you pointed out the stretching. After looking at it taking stretching into account, it's actually the crater thats in the 2000 pic stretched out to the side along with the small area. Just take the small dark crater where the anomaly is and stretch it and that small area, you will see exactly the image from "1960". Good job in spotting that, good job.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:48 PM
link   
WHy is this so obviously a "Huge alien structure?" Its unbeleivable to me that people aren't in the least way objective towards this kind of thing. Besides The oblong structure pointing towards an alienmade object, What else could make this shape?? Hmmm, possibly a round crater that has been stretched due to an image error (which would also account for the Blurred nature of that section of the image). No, That's stupid. It's obviously an alien made structure. Not only that but I think it's obvious to everyone else that it is clearly the entrance to the portal that connects the moon and the beings that live in our hollow earth. Also I think Nasa covered it up because it may also be used as a secret facility when they have intergalactic meetings wit h the federation of light. Honestly, What is this? In The Near infinite expanse of the universe it's Naive to think that we are the only possible life out there. However, Not using ones own judgement and jumping to ridiculous conclusions is just as sad. Think before you yell aliens.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:50 PM
link   
I just realized that some people share my opinion and have restored faith in people 's judgement, thanks to the select view who are capable of looking at things critically and not proclaiming them 100% irrefutable evidence



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:54 PM
link   
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
 

It was stretched in order to fit the mosaic to the digital elevation model. Where there are problems with the DEM, there are problems with the mosaic.

DEM Artifacts: There are a few areas in the global mosaic where spikes or artifacts in the ULCN 2005 topographic or digital elevation model (DEM) caused artifacts or errors in the LO mosaic. For each pixel in a LO frame, radius values from the same site in the DEM file are used to project the pixel onto the surface. Pronounced artifacts in the DEM were propagated to the projected LO image data.

www.mapaplanet.org...

The original Lunar Orbiter images are readily available (I think you know that).



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by chrisskates
WHy is this so obviously a "Huge alien structure?" Its unbeleivable to me that people aren't in the least way objective towards this kind of thing. Besides The oblong structure pointing towards an alienmade object, What else could make this shape?? Hmmm, possibly a round crater that has been stretched due to an image error (which would also account for the Blurred nature of that section of the image). No, That's stupid. It's obviously an alien made structure. Not only that but I think it's obvious to everyone else that it is clearly the entrance to the portal that connects the moon and the beings that live in our hollow earth. Also I think Nasa covered it up because it may also be used as a secret facility when they have intergalactic meetings wit h the federation of light. Honestly, What is this? In The Near infinite expanse of the universe it's Naive to think that we are the only possible life out there. However, Not using ones own judgement and jumping to ridiculous conclusions is just as sad. Think before you yell aliens.


Well....a paragraph full of making fun of people and sarcasm is surely not an argument. At least, not one i am open to consider.

For me it goes like this: I have been told by "people" that we are mining the moon and have been for 50 years or so. I have seen some pictorial evidence of robotic drones doing the labor. It is all located in the link in my signature.

But make no mistake. I am not out to prove anything to anyone. I KNOW. If the rest of you do not, that is not my problem. I cannot convince people, and have no desire to. Knowing is enough for me.

I can tell you that there are people on this forum that would surprise you. Movie stars (past and present), musicians, and government employees. There are whistleblowers among us. All they want is someone who will not tell their secrets, and will not laugh at them when they reach out.

Try being a little more open minded. Or at least, not so condescending. You would be surprised what that, plus a little good reputation, can get you.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 08:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
 

It was stretched in order to fit the mosaic to the digital elevation model. Where there are problems with the DEM, there are problems with the mosaic.

DEM Artifacts: There are a few areas in the global mosaic where spikes or artifacts in the ULCN 2005 topographic or digital elevation model (DEM) caused artifacts or errors in the LO mosaic. For each pixel in a LO frame, radius values from the same site in the DEM file are used to project the pixel onto the surface. Pronounced artifacts in the DEM were propagated to the projected LO image data.

www.mapaplanet.org...

The original Lunar Orbiter images are readily available (I think you know that).




Yeah, i do. I am more trying to challenge peoples mindset. Being a skeptic that actually will find his own answers (like yourself) is far preferrable over the sarcastic, childish skeptic who can only seem to find ridicule in place of a well reasoned response.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 09:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by balon0
Its strange how one of the world's most advanced tech organization have such terrible skills in photo shopping. Why are they making it so obvious that photos have been manipulated with air brushing, stretching etc.


People seem to be misunderstanding the OP...

Neither "side" here is claiming that the image in question was photoshopped -- not in the OP, and not the skeptics.

The OP isn't claiming that the part that looks "stretched" is a photoshopped smudge covering up something else. The OP is claiming that the part that we are saying looks stretched is NOT stretched or blurred or photoshopped, but rather is a clear picture of a structure that some say looks like a 1980s digital watch.

The people (such as myself) who are saying it's just a stretched image are also not claiming photoshop. We are saying that it simply is a digital image artifact. We are saying that the full image is a mosaic made up of a bunch of smaller images, and one of those smaller images is stretched.

[edit on 6/29/2010 by Soylent Green Is People]



new topics

top topics



 
87
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join