It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Huge Alien Structure Revealed - Far Side of the Moon 2010 *PHOTOS*

page: 6
87
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 03:50 PM
link   
check this out!!!!

looks man made to me, out of tin foil i suspect, but how did it get on the moon???!!




posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Conal

Does anybody have any actual evidence of alien or man made structures on the moon or mars?
I mean decent evidence.

someone said there is lots of documentation to prove it. I would like to see some. so if anyone can share some "decent" evidence i would be happy to look with an open mind.

Till then please stop wasting our time.
peace


Yes , there are numerous images that have made it to the public that show blatant airbrushing. So yes they were trying to hide something, in my book thats "decent" evidence. I had the pics on my HD but I just reformatted like a week ago, but the pictures I'm talking about should be fairly easy to find. (I really need an external HD :*(

If your really intesrested, maybe just spend some time on you tube abd do a search for "Structures on the Moon" and watch a few videos, and you be the judge.

I'm fairly sure those airbrushed towers and other obelisks ect. taken from around the same time were legit.

I remember the one video where the woman tells the story of the guy showing her the real photo's "pre-airbrushed", and she nearly fell over.

"He said, yea we always have to airbrush these out before we release them to the public."

Anyone remember the video I'm talking about? Or the airbrushed pictures that were from it, and supposedly legit?

Unfortunately now Photoshop programs are so good, "SCARY GOOD" they could hide a 1,000 yard spacecraft parked on the far side of the moon and even the best image analyzer wouldn't see anything fishy.

I remember a post made a couple months ago about the new PS software. It was wild the guy did a simple run through tutorial of some of this programs features (can't remember the name of the software darn). But he made roads disapear , and anything else that he didn't wan't in the [icture, with just a simple click of the mouse. People in the background ruining a great picture, "poof" gone in just a matter of 15 seconds or so as the program crunched away at the image. My jaw dropped wide open.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Nola213
 


trust me i have done countless hours of research on this topic and have come to the conclusion that there is no decent evidence.
evidence of tampering perhaps but only perhaps.

I want to believe but not blindly.
thank you anyway

peace



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:13 PM
link   
reply to post by Nola213
 


hey i do remember that video! actually thata was a good one but unfortunately still leaves us in the same place..unsure and uncertain...darn it!!



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Not Convinced.
These photos are not clear enough to make a judgement, They look photoshopped to me. However it is a step up from John Lear's photos that show absolutely nothing at all.

However I could be wrong and we are looking at an alien base, But I think I will
wait for a clearer shot from this decade to be leaked. Which is not likely but we can always hope.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by DJM8507
I actually know a guy whose brother worked in the Air Force in conjunction with NASA and he claims to have directly seen the photographs that showed an extremely large artificial structure on the far side of the moon. He also stated that astronauts actually explored the structure briefly and it was determined that the artifacts were of human origin.

He said at the time (early 1970s I believe) he figured that the world would hear about it very soon. He is still in disbelief that it has been classified/hidden this entire time.

This is of course pure hearsay with no actual evidence besides his testimony to back it up.


The astronauts could not have landed on the backside of the Moon. None of the missions had that capability. If you or he wants to claim it was a secret mission--well....

[edit on 29-6-2010 by Aliensun]



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by bigyin
I don't even know why this is on the front page of ATS ... embarrassing to say the least.

Can mods send to hoax or better still the trash box.


Oh, no! Let's liven it up. Please! someone suggest that it was real at one time but we bombed it into nothingness! (That worked for a bit with the Mars "Face.") That way, many more pages can be generated by those with nothing else to do (like me now) and before you know it, the whole evening is shot. Beats TV don'it?



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 05:05 PM
link   
regarding the OP's video of the structure. It is just a smeared photo. nothing crazy about it. Anyone who has worked with photoshop or any photo editing program can see that this is nothing but a distorted image. How is this post #1 on ATS....this place is going downhill.

Want proof? sorry, even proof wont change minds, its like trying to argue that coke taste better than pepsi when its all opinion.

All I can say is, that is not a structure. the pixels are malformed and blurred it so blatantly obvious.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 05:08 PM
link   
Looks stretched with photoshop


Second Liney



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 05:11 PM
link   

However, the ignorance of those that treat their desire to believe like a religion will take ridiculous stuff like this and run with it. In the end, we all get lumped into one group and looked down upon as a bunch of ignorant wackos.


While I completely agree this is probably just a photo anomaly, posting it here isn't going to get anyone labeled a "whacko." Who... other people on this site? Big deal. It's not like Joe Public at large will ever visit ANY conspiracy site.

And I don't understand why in all of your scathing replies, you continue to say "WE will all get labeled.. everyone will look down on US.." and so on. You are not "us." You are one of "them." A biased debunker who uses a method of trying to sound as scornful as possible to make people feel like idiots to prove your point.

While I believe in UFO and visitation by something, I do NOT believe probably 90+ % of the stuff that gets posted here. I disagree... usually in a more civil tone.. but I am still one of "us." I actually believe in UFOs. I have yet to see you support a single UFO case. You only attack the feeble cases, and utterly ignore the cases with some backing and evidence.

[edit on 29-6-2010 by fleabit]



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 05:15 PM
link   
I highly doubt its an alien structure, it just looks like a strange formation to me. and if it is a structure (which a highly doubt) then it is not made by aliens, it would be man made. Go figure if it was a secret man made little outpost or base on the moon of course they would smudge out the picture.

Some people just want some things to stay out of the (public) picture cause little things seems to cause alot of panic, because homo sapiens hate change and new things.

But as a i said its just a strange rock formation



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 05:24 PM
link   
I need an original picture of the structure/stretched crater to determine if it really was a data clone or not.

ZEITGEIST, if you would be so kind and find me a picture in it's original orientation that would be greatly appriciated.

Dataclones generally don't occur if the object was snapped diagonally. if it's straight it may be plausible.

Does anyone know how exactly these pictures were sent to earth?



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 05:33 PM
link   
Anybody knows what is this 'X' in the shadows?



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 05:33 PM
link   
absolute total and utter rubbish! You can quite clearly see the digital stretch marks, lack of details and texture compared to the rest of the area, smoothness from digital blurring/stretching and the lighting around the 'artefact' doesn't follow the correct directions, or depths. Not to mention the lack of jpeg/compression artefacts in that area compared to the rest of the entire frame.

A complete and utter digital altering, I should now... it's what I do for a living. it's either intentionally done, or part of an automated stitch where there wasn't enough info so the software had to 'fill in' the blanks.

And there was me getting all excited! disappointing



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 06:33 PM
link   
reply to post by reject
 


Kaguya's photos are available since November.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by masterp
Anybody knows what is this 'X' in the shadows?


I noticed the white x as well but dont know what it is.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 06:41 PM
link   
I didn't saw it mentioned (although I may have missed it), but does anyone know the ID for the original Lunar Orbiter photo?



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 06:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by [davinci]
reply to post by SKUNK2
 


In order to get any type of resolution on the surface ot the moon you need a telescope with a 18 inch (+) mirror. In most cases this means having it custom ground by an optics manufacturer.

Any idiot can check the brouchers and see how expensive that type of hardware is.


The point that a few here have already stated is that it doesn't matter how big the telescope is. You can't see the back side of the moon with any earth based telescope. we only ever see the one side of the moon.
This very fact is one of the main reasons that the structures are believed to be where they are.
Have a google for "The Disclosure Project" Many very well respected figures from the military and Nasa have been very outspoken on this issue and were prepared to take it to congress and swear on oath.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Aliensun

Originally posted by bigyin
I don't even know why this is on the front page of ATS ... embarrassing to say the least.

Can mods send to hoax or better still the trash box.


Oh, no! Let's liven it up. Please! someone suggest that it was real at one time but we bombed it into nothingness! (That worked for a bit with the Mars "Face.") That way, many more pages can be generated by those with nothing else to do (like me now) and before you know it, the whole evening is shot. Beats TV don'it?

Maybe what you say is in part the answer. All around in the pic are crater impacts, and this is also the problem. Why, in the name of Harry would anyone on the Moon want to set up shop on its surface...not me for sure. Supposing the pic is in fact an artificial structure, it would have to be something that was structured elsewhere and landed or crashlanded on the Moon's surface.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 06:51 PM
link   
Where's this "reveal" of a huge alien structure?

I see nothing but a blurred section of photo.

If you people who believe so blindly that there's alien structures on the moon or Mars, then post a pic like this :



When I see something like that from the Moon or Mars, and I do mean JUST like that - none of this mottled low res stuff or typical photo pixelisation due to zooming - THEN I'll believe you.

Until then, stop wasting peoples' time with this junk


FYI: no, that is not an image of the moon, before people fail to check the link...




top topics



 
87
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join