It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Third US carrier, 4,000 Marines augment US armada opposite Iran

page: 3
43
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 12:51 AM
link   
just when you thought it was safe, now this, that would explain Syria meeting with Chavez and Cuba. Iran meet with them last week.




posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:07 AM
link   
I have prodived a source (business insider) that claims ships are heading towards Iran but as far as I can tell this seems very "clouded"

US NAVAL MAP

Really not sure if I linked the source right, ahh yes thats right I am a noob so sorry its really whatever so teach me then I will know website doesnt have the best GUI/interface.


ConsciousTruth-



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by bekod
just when you thought it was safe, now this, that would explain Syria meeting with Chavez and Cuba. Iran meet with them last week.


Then you add this to the mix:
Scary Letter From Fidel Castro In Regards To Iran War
Sounds like drums of war to me.


[edit on 29/6/2010 by MorfeuZ]



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:20 AM
link   
I think this is just the start of something very big and it will affect all of us.
I can't help but think of MAD MAX 2 and what was said at the start of the movie.

Let's hope it doesn't work out that way._javascript:icon('
')



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:24 AM
link   
It sounds like a power play to me, join the navy, see the world...it is a flexing of muscle...a lot of doublethink going also as the queen is supposed to address the UN with a plea for peace...I say relax a bit...it says that Iran pulled back its escort ships so the effort to impress how eager the US is ready to stand guard appears to be working...let peace reign for a while longer at least...



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:27 AM
link   
The Royal Family will send whatever resources the US requests and they WILL BE UTILISED,the Queens visit to Canada isnt a fluke,and whoever the insolent little prick is who keeps on refering to Her Majesty the Queen in derogetory terms,there is STILL NO PLACE ON EARTH WHERE YOU OUT OF REACH OF THE REALM.Dont let yourself forget that fact.

The Queens power is further reaching than the American sphere of influence.


And as Canadians we support the Queen in every way.

And you dont hear anyone on these forums referring to the President or the Prime Minister in those terms,so this indicates that this individual is also a coward who prefers to insult women of power,sounds like the person had an overbearing parent.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:33 AM
link   
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread.

It's time the U.S. cut its puppet master's control strings and began acting in the interests of its own people.

If you think a military draft to support this misadventure will have a warm reception in the states, you're suffering from severe delusions and terminal stupidity. I suspect the American public will tell them where to shove it.

[edit on 6/29/2010 by dubiousone]



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:36 AM
link   
Forget carrier groups, look for port-a-pots.

That's how friends of mine knew the USSR was going to invade Afghanistan. Satellite photos showed acres of port-a-pots queued up by the Afghan border.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:51 AM
link   
According to "debka files" story in OP:


The USS Nassau (LHA-4) Amphibious Ready Group 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit, tasked with supporting the Bahrain-based 5th Fleet area of operations, is cruising around the Bab al-Mandeb Straits where the Gulf of Aden flows into the Red Sea.


According to the navy:


USS Nassau (LHA 4) - visit Port Victoria

www.navy.mil...



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by one4all
The Royal Family will send whatever resources the US requests and they WILL BE UTILISED,the Queens visit to Canada isnt a fluke,and whoever the insolent little prick is who keeps on refering to Her Majesty the Queen in derogetory terms,there is STILL NO PLACE ON EARTH WHERE YOU OUT OF REACH OF THE REALM.Dont let yourself forget that fact.

The Queens power is further reaching than the American sphere of influence.


And as Canadians we support the Queen in every way.

And you dont hear anyone on these forums referring to the President or the Prime Minister in those terms,so this indicates that this individual is also a coward who prefers to insult women of power,sounds like the person had an overbearing parent.


Made my day reading this . Hilarious patriot.

I imagine you will rush off to defend at the blink and call... In another land. Go I say, front line line for you, dignified Patriot!

Her majesty needs you!



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 01:52 AM
link   
Also funny enough slightly off topic USS George H.W. BUSH also known as CVN-77 is getting closer to wrapping up sea trials and fired first two "evolved NATO sea sparrow missiles" also launching several RAM (rolling airframe missiles) with reported success quoted on two separate new agencies and navy . gov site confirms sea trails to end this summer and maiden deployment between end of CSSQT trials this summer and beginning of 2011.

I am worried:

The US NAVY map I posted earlier and a bunch of news about Iran sending several blockade ships after World Cup to Israel

AND with Turkey now on the gobble gobble makes me think things are coming to a head in the near to semi-near future. All depends on the back room deals "the anointed one" makes. Mr. Kenya I mean. I have to believe Israel is getting sick of U.S. stopping action, I know someone needs to halt Iran because CIA Director Leon Panetta is quoted saying Iran has enough uranium for 2 bombs that should be enriched next year with a weaponization anywhere from 1-2 years.

I doubt very much that it will take that long and these estimates are exactly that, guess work. Especially since they caught 007's long lost cousin "Mr. CRYSTAL CIA" snorting crystal meth on a 5ft mosaic. Anyway someone has a giant dookie on the move towards Boeing’s giant wind turbine fan = Do you smell something tart?

ConsciousTruth-



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 02:10 AM
link   
weve been at war over in taht dessert for liek 10 years now, this is nothing new.,



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 02:28 AM
link   
Guessing,you guessed it!I also happened to be a relative of Her Majesty the Queen.

You might be surprised how many people will do as I do,at the drop of a hat.

Funny how us Canadians are always jumping the gun and running around causing trouble isnt it?

There are no more real borders on this planet,most of us are recognising this,where in the world CANT you find a McDonalds?

My alliegence is to humanity ,via whichever conduit I deem to be suitable to reaching that end.You dont need to be a patriot to spot an arsehole who disrespects women,and political figureheads in a personal manner.If I had a leather glove I would slap him with it----or is that the French thing to do?Hell I am Canadian so whats the difference.Hold on here was that drop the gauntlet???or drop the glove??Just kidding,but point made.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 02:32 AM
link   
I'm not convinced yet. For one thing, good as they are, it would be a serious mistake sending in Marines, and yet they're supposedly a part of the contingent. What would they do except die? Iran has over half a million troops, and 3 million paramilitary--that's right, 3 MILLION. Meanwhile, the bulk of our troops are bogged down in two other senseless wars. How could this be anything but an air war?

But if we are foolish enough to attack Iran, better hope they don't have those Russian Sunburn missiles that I've heard they have, or there's a good chance we'll have some sunk carriers. I hope Obama is smarter than this.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 03:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Shrukin89
I'm feeling something is gonna start soon. And another feeling that the Queen is the 3rd Anti Christ.


I thought the Third Anti Christ was "Mabus"

This is pretty interesting! Regarding Ray Mabus and the Navy!
www.youtube.com...



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 03:42 AM
link   
i didn't know hilliary was speaking at un



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


I don't think so, as the majority of people have lost all respect for the real axis of evil, Great Britain, America & Israeli governments and will certainly not back any plans for a full scale invasion. Any kind of attack on Iran is unjustified and therefore will not be supported by the masses and if Iran is attacked, then they have every right to defend themselves. I know who I'll be rooting for if war does break out. Down with the real axis of evil.


As for the Queen, someone please do us a favour and throw her overboard.



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:59 AM
link   
reply to post by edgecrusher2199
 


lol.....
so isn't the nassau.....

and the nassau isn't a "baby", it's more like a senior citizen....about to be retired. it's not "new" to the area either, it's been floating around the gulf of aden for close to six months.....

and, it's not the only ship there with marines I think... a few others have marines stationed on them. it's also been out to sea for close to six months without any ports, I imagine the crew would be quite irked if their return was delayed for a war like that.....

conclusion:::

there won't be any war with iran until that ship brings my son home!!!!



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 04:59 AM
link   
reply to post by kindred
 

This is from a well written article about public US/Iran relationship.



Fox News, September 2009: When asked “Do you support or oppose the United States taking military action to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons?” 61 percent of 900 registered voters supported military action and 28 opposed it.

Poll Source



Pew Research Center, October 2009: When asked which is more important, “to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, even if it means taking military action,” or “to avoid a military conflict with Iran, even if it means they may develop nuclear weapons,” 61 percent of 1,500 respondents favored the first reply and 24 percent the second.

Poll Source



Not only does a strong majority — 57, 52, 58, 61, and 61 percent in these five polls — already favor using force, but after a strike Americans will presumably rally around the flag, sending that number much higher.


I don't like statistics but these fit own perception I get from reading forum posts. Not only I think majority fully support the war but most of those that don't are likely to be somewhere on the edge needing more doses of propaganda.

Edit: but these people are for actual war. If Iran attacks US navy these polls would switch to 99% for the war.

That is why, a well executed false flag would do the magic shift of the poll and not because "everything on ATS is false flag"

[edit on 29/6/2010 by SassyCat]



posted on Jun, 29 2010 @ 05:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by SassyCat

Edit: but these people are for actual war. If Iran attacks US navy these polls would switch to 99% for the war.
[edit on 29/6/2010 by SassyCat]


Not me man, I'd still be dead set against it.



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join