The use of subliminals for the normalisation of chemtrails(Pictures)., page 1

I'd just like to present a few picture's people have collected. Are these normal or are they put there on purpose? The more you see something the more you think it's normal no ?

After watching the skies for an amount of time i've come to the conclusion that chemtrail's/geo engineering is hapening.

But some people say that these are normal, i questioned myself as to why. Here is my reason i believe people dont question them.

Source


Source


From an O2 Tv advert


Yoghurt - Miller time


Over the hedge kids film


Used on a yahoo news article


From a paper


Metro Uk paper


Matchbox kids toys


Same


Cartoon from paper




Big bro uk




Nasa


Metro uk paper















Why did i come to that conclusion you may ask, it's after watching some derren brown stuff. Here is a short video to kind of explain my reasoning.

www.youtube.com...

[edit on 28-6-2010 by slylee]

Here's some more:

LINK

reply to post by slylee

---

I'm still up in the air concerning chem/con trails. On Tuesday there will be tons of air traffic and the accompanying chemcon trails. Wed. hardly any traffic and few sporadic chemcon trails. And yes they do seem to have become a meme.

reply to post by Tamale_214

---

Thanks, glad to see more people notice. If you click the source on the second picture, take a read of the article and comments at the bottom. Very interesting IMO.

reply to post by slylee

---

To the OP (and to Tamale):

If you click the source on the second picture, take a read of the article and comments at the bottom. Very interesting IMO.

What do you find so "interesting" in that linked article, near the bottom? The "20,000 square miles" figure?

The article explains quite well HOW and WHY normal contrails will form, and why (under proper atmospheric conditions) they will spread, and become enhanced, by NATURAL processes....just as the atmosphere has been doing for (likely) hundreds of millions of years.

For Tamale, in particular:

You say you see contrails "below 30,000 feet"??

Please explain exactly how you determined their altitude.
~~~~~~~~
Oh, and to add: NO, they are not some form of "subliminals". That IS a new twist, though....haven't heard it yet, except here.

Contrails are such a ubiquitous occurence, they are used in all sorts of ways, especially if advertising/promoting or whatever (even the cartoon) has something to do with flying or aviation.

AT MY airline we had a monthly packet of refresher training materials that we had to complete (read, take the tests, etc) in order to remain qualified (that was only PART of remaining qualified, every six months)...for decades the test/refresher/newsletter was titled "Contrails". This harkened back to one of the Airline's old iconic logo and paint scheme design...a stylized CONTRAIL image. This dated back to the 1960s!

I have over three decades' flying experience, and I know that they are contrails...and there are NO "chemtrails", not in the sense that this hysteria that has grown up makes them to be....

Hint: The "20,000 square miles" from the article should give you a bit of a clue...as to the impossiblity, and unfeasiblity of such a "project".

Been trying to find a video I saw of Great Britain and Europe air traffic...there is a LOT, and England (for those who complain about England getting so much cloud cover) is overflown a LOT too...

Here's one of the Lower 48 States, to get an idea:



Found a (not very good) one for Europe and England and Ireland:







[edit on 28 June 2010 by weedwhacker]

reply to post by slylee

---

What about these ones?

contrailscience.com...

1967

1944

They've been doing it since the 40's!!!!



[edit on 29/6/10 by Chadwickus]

reply to post by Tamale_214

---

You didn't really answer...you dodged:

First of all, I didn't determine their altitude, I determined what was NOT their altitude and, I did it with my eyes weedwhacker, I can tell the difference with my eyes.

WHAT altitude were they at? (Not, what altitude they "weren't" at! See the difference?)

Now, you claim you could easily discern what you were seeing, so to you that "proves" they weren't "6 miles away".

OK...then describe what you saw, what type of airplanes, their altitude, and IF there were trails behind them.

(Note that contrails CAN form as low as ~25,000 feet too).

reply to post by Yellow Teapot

---

Yellow Teapot

To me, the chemtrail/geo-engineering (look it up) project is one of the greatest crimes ever committed upon this planet.
After almost 7 years of watching, reading, listening and testing counter measures, I have no doubt whatsoever that these lunatics are spraying us all closer to death.

Seven years! This entire "chemtrail" nonsense has been going on for a long time, hasn't it? Funny how people still fall for it...

You are so convinced of this "spraying" campaign...BUT, have you ever stopped to think, sat down and down some calculations??

In one article referenced in the OP, the figure "20,000 square miles" is mentioned to describe the extent to which cirriform type clouds will spread out over the sky. Not surprising, when you consider HOW FAR YOU CAN SEE, when you look up, and then calculate the total area, in square unites (miles or kms, your choice) overhead.

THEN...well, we'll just use the "20,000" square miles. Stop, think and do the maths....HOW MUCH material would be needed? To spread out to that size??

HOW is that much material to be carried? What type, and how many airplanes? What other methods of lofting can be used? Do you SEE any other methods being employed??

Face it --- you see CONTRAILS, which consist mostly of ice crystals, derived from the existing water vapor that is present in our atmosphere.

The airplanes that make the contrails are normal, regular passenger and cargo (FedEx, UPS, DHL, etc) flights.

THAT is it. Period. Sorry, this seems like an all-encompassing hobby for you, but it's a fool's errand......

OWL CITY....isn't that cute?

Chemtrails in the Disney/Pixar movie 'Cars' 2006



Microsoft Windows 98 Logo




other Microsoft Chemtrails
WINDOWS CHEMTRAILS SUBLIMINALS



[edit on 29-6-2010 by superluminal11]

[edit on 29-6-2010 by superluminal11]

[edit on 29-6-2010 by superluminal11]

reply to post by superluminal11

---

I am not getting the point of that post?

You guys might want to look up the actual definiton of "subliminal", perhaps....because a BIG, very OBVIOUS photo of something, or included in the background of something else (things like contrails, which are ubiquitous) is not meeting the standards of being "subliminal".

Subliminal stimuli, (literally "below threshold"), contrary to supraliminal stimuli or "above threshold", are any sensory stimuli below an individual's absolute threshold for conscious perception. Visual stimuli may be quickly flashed before an individual may process them, or flashed and then masked, thereby interrupting the processing.

en.wikipedia.org...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

OK...I see you've added to, and enhanced youroriginal post. Very well....

YOU do know the difference, between 'supraluminal' and 'sub-' (it's even in your screename!)

HOWEVER...the height of paranoid is very prominently displayed in that YouTube video selection...it is beyond silly. Sorry. Not buying it.

People, advertisers, artists, urban planners...they put clouds into images because they are more interesting than a blank, plain blue sky!!!

It is really that simple.





[edit on 29 June 2010 by weedwhacker]

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by slylee

---

What about these ones?

contrailscience.com...

1967

1944

They've been doing it since the 40's!!!!



[edit on 29/6/10 by Chadwickus]

Well those trails dont look like the ones I see, those look like contrails, the ones I see are more like the second picture of the OPs post...

reply to post by CREAM

---

...the ones I see are more like the second picture of the OPs post...

??

The second picture in the OP's post are ALSO contrails. They happen to be taken from a point on the ground where air traffic is passing overhead on many different headings, as the air traffic travels between various widely separated departure and destination points!

Look at a map of the United States, or Europe....look at airline schedules, and the city pairs that are served. You will see AMPLE spots where paths cross, and airplanes flying those routes, when they make contrails, will leave them in a criss-cross looking manner.

Chad's image from 1967 happens to show an area where most flights were roughly parallel...that is the only difference. Could be anywhere, but mostly on one of the Coasts (East Coast US especially, NorthEast sector) where there is so much traffic over the North Atlantic routes...primarily west-to-east, and vice versa, of course. Even in 1967, VERY busy over those routes....today, more so....
~~~~~~~~~~~~

Edit: Here's a link to an example North Atlantic Plotting Chart (most airlines use Jeppesen products, and they are seriously copyrighted...you have to pay for the right to post them!)



Charts like this are used for navigation reference, and some simplified versions (the ones for actual "plotting") are used in flight, and written on, as we track the over-water and out of radar portions of the flight, to verify navigational systems performance and accuracy. (These finished materials are KEPT by the airline for a minimum of six months, in case any question arises later...like, they sit as "smoking gun" evidence if a crew screws something up!).

Anyway, you may need help interpreting...but you can see all the points on the coast, both in North America, and in England/Europe where flights' routings are "anchored", for the crossing over the Atlantic. Similar routes head down to South America, too...all over the World, there are established waypoints like this, in the air, to navigate by.

The black triangles, those are the "intersections"/waypoints. "Intersections" are denoted by the five-letter 'names'. Other waypoints, sometimes, by their Latitude/Longitude
(such as, "N49 W30" for cardinal coordinates in degrees...occasionally minutes will be used, if not on a whole degree point).







[edit on 29 June 2010 by weedwhacker]

Next week all military bases go on 3-week alert
  Posted 2 days ago with 10 member flags

Remote Viewing (ESP) Used By The Military In Both America & Russia
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags

The US Military Can Clearly Afford A Major Budget Cut
  Posted 19 days ago with 5 member flags

DARPA Cheetah runs faster than Usain
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags

Lets build a town (complete with subways, highway etc) for field exercise..
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags

Darpa Robotic Dog : Okay it works - Scale it up = Imperial Walker : Hoth System
  Posted 0 days ago with 3 member flags

Air Force Seeking Cyber-Weapons
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags

Space Enabled Effects for Military Engagements (Seeme)
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: