Ideas, thoughts, information, and comments on this post will be greatly appreciated. Some of the material presented comes from an email from Arktwo,
a "source" which is linked, one is directly from the Navy web site, link provided and another from a news paper, link provided. Approximatly 20 to
25 Naval Battle Groups are being deployed from vairous countries. A battle group normally will consist of an Aricraft Carrier and the
San Diego Union-Tribune June 03, 2004
Huge Navy deployment to test emergency plan
By James W. Crawley
Seven aircraft carriers – more than half the nation's flattops – along with several dozen escort ships and about 40,000 sailors will be at sea
starting this week for the first demonstration of the Navy's emergency deployment plan.
"It's pretty significant, but (the Navy) hasn't done a good job of explaining how significant it is," said John Pike, director of
GlobalSecurity.org, an independent think tank in Alexandria. Va.
Information from: The Status of the Navy web page at :
Ships Underway (away from homeport): 164 (56% of total)
On deployment: 108 ships (37% of total)
This is 272 ships which is 93% of our surface ships
(away from homeport):30 submarines (57% of submarine force
On deployment: 8 submarines (15% of submarine force)
This represents 38 Subs which is 72% of our Subs.
This email report from a from a source, always reliable: Arktwo...
US has twelve carriers. The idea is to have six in port and six at sea. Under the most pressing situation the Navy is supposed to be able to get seven
to sea and an eighth two weeks later.
Today - ten have been ordered to sea.
But - ten at sea. Apparantly has NEVER happened before. And it is not just American ships - British, Indian, Russian, New Zealand, and Australia have
put to sea and the relatively few that the Chinese have.
If you see a contradiction on the number of Carriers deployed, keep in mind, some were already out there. Almost all of our Navy has been deployed.
A submarine recently had two missle tubes taken out to make room for 30 Navy Seals...Again from Arktwo...
A state food inspector reported to me her visit to a civilian ship repair yard with contracts for nuclear submarines. These places have cafeterias for
their employees and have to be inspected just like anywhere else. Anyway there was a lot of activity there - and guess what they were doing - tearing
out the nuclear missile launch tubes. Why? To make room for troops that would sneak in close to shore.
Now read these from the Navy sites.
On Feb. 23, USS La Jolla (SSN 701), Los Angeles Class nuclear-powered attack submarine, departed on a Western Pacific deployment from its homeport of
Pearl Harbour. It serves as a platform for Special Operations Forces. More than 30 additional Sailors were brought onboard as part of Seal Delivery
Vehicle Team One.
And all that is just what is being reported on the Naval scene. You have to remember it is all still just psyops. What is not being reported is what
(The US space nuclear test - for instance - earlier announced - but nothing further - and all the HAARP stuff going on, for example.)
Major troop and aircraft movements are also taking place.
The Rothschild's getting out of gold price setting, after centuries of monopoly in the area.
Bilderbergers meeting followed almost immediatly by the G-8 summit.
Now more info from: The Cutting Edge Weekly Update
Why has the U.S. Navy suddenly dispatched 10 of its 12 carrier attack groups to the open sea last week? This sudden flight from port to open sea is
historically unprecedented and caused many people to ask, "Why"? (snip)
How significant is this sudden deployment?
"Central to the new operating plan is the Navy's ability to 'pulse' or 'surge' its aircraft carriers to one or more trouble areas
simultaneously. The plan says the Navy will deploy up to six carrier strike groups within 30 days of receiving orders and, within 90 days, two more
carrier groups. So, in three months, according to the plan, the Navy could have two-thirds of its carriers steaming near a war zone. Not only will the
Navy be coordinating the movement of several dozen ships around the world, but also keeping them supplied simultaneously with everything from aircraft
spare parts to fuel to food."
This is the official Navy response and it does make sense. However, when you consider that the number of American carrier groups deployed has risen to
10, further questions arise.
NEWS BRIEF: "Ten US Navy Carriers Now At Sea - Only Two In Port: USS Carl Vinson Has Gone Out", From Radwick, Rense.com, 6-10-4\
"This brings the number of carriers over the horizon to 10. This would prove to be a most COSTLY exercise if in fact this is ONLY an exercise. OR,
are they all on emergency operational deployment? Of the remaining 2 carriers only USS Nimitz is deployable (snip)
If you have been really checking the news lately, you are aware of meteriors coming down in various places and strange flashes of light and
unexplained "booms" in the atmosphere. Is this from HAARP or some other technology such as lasers being tested on meteriors in preparation for
All in all, this news seems to be quite distressing and makes me wonder what is going on. We are looking at billions to deploy such a naval armada
just for exercises. Knowing the Imperial Federal Government as I do, it is very hard to trust a move like this one. There are too many questions
and no answers!
My big question is, are we on the eve of WWIII?